* lguest: bug in lg_irq_enable?
@ 2015-02-26 15:39 Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-02 0:14 ` Rusty Russell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Denys Vlasenko @ 2015-02-26 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rusty Russell, Linux Kernel Mailing List
ENTRY(lg_irq_enable)
/*
* The reverse of irq_disable, this sets lguest_data.irq_enabled to
* X86_EFLAGS_IF (ie. "Interrupts enabled").
*/
movl $X86_EFLAGS_IF, lguest_data+LGUEST_DATA_irq_enabled
/*
* But now we need to check if the Host wants to know: there might have
* been interrupts waiting to be delivered, in which case it will have
* set lguest_data.irq_pending to X86_EFLAGS_IF. If it's not zero, we
* jump to send_interrupts, otherwise we're done.
*/
testl $0, lguest_data+LGUEST_DATA_irq_pending
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^??????????
jnz send_interrupts
/*
* One cool thing about x86 is that you can do many things without using
* a register. In this case, the normal path hasn't needed to save or
* restore any registers at all!
*/
ret
send_interrupts:
TEST with zero will always set ZF. Thus, "jnz send_interrupts" never jumps.
--
vda
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: lguest: bug in lg_irq_enable?
2015-02-26 15:39 lguest: bug in lg_irq_enable? Denys Vlasenko
@ 2015-03-02 0:14 ` Rusty Russell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2015-03-02 0:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denys Vlasenko, Linux Kernel Mailing List
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com> writes:
> ENTRY(lg_irq_enable)
> /*
> * The reverse of irq_disable, this sets lguest_data.irq_enabled to
> * X86_EFLAGS_IF (ie. "Interrupts enabled").
> */
> movl $X86_EFLAGS_IF, lguest_data+LGUEST_DATA_irq_enabled
> /*
> * But now we need to check if the Host wants to know: there might have
> * been interrupts waiting to be delivered, in which case it will have
> * set lguest_data.irq_pending to X86_EFLAGS_IF. If it's not zero, we
> * jump to send_interrupts, otherwise we're done.
> */
> testl $0, lguest_data+LGUEST_DATA_irq_pending
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^??????????
Heh, that should be cmpl! Nice catch!
Cheers,
Rusty.
Subject: lguest: fix pending interrupt test.
Denys says:
TEST with zero will always set ZF. Thus, "jnz send_interrupts" never jumps.
We get interrupts regularly enough that this didn't cause immediate problems.
Reported-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
diff --git a/arch/x86/lguest/head_32.S b/arch/x86/lguest/head_32.S
index 6ddfe4fc23c3..05b0a85507ce 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lguest/head_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lguest/head_32.S
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ ENTRY(lg_irq_enable)
* set lguest_data.irq_pending to X86_EFLAGS_IF. If it's not zero, we
* jump to send_interrupts, otherwise we're done.
*/
- testl $0, lguest_data+LGUEST_DATA_irq_pending
+ cmpl $0, lguest_data+LGUEST_DATA_irq_pending
jnz send_interrupts
/*
* One cool thing about x86 is that you can do many things without using
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-02 10:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-26 15:39 lguest: bug in lg_irq_enable? Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-02 0:14 ` Rusty Russell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome