From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Use per-file CFLAGS in Makefile
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 18:15:09 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878uynrjaa.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130920230132.GK9574@pd.tnic> (Borislav Petkov's message of "Sat, 21 Sep 2013 01:01:32 +0200")
Hi Borislav,
On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 01:01:32 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:11:16AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> -$(OUTPUT)util/scripting-engines/trace-event-perl.o: util/scripting-engines/trace-event-perl.c $(OUTPUT)PERF-CFLAGS
>> - $(QUIET_CC)$(CC) -o $@ -c $(CFLAGS) $(PERL_EMBED_CCOPTS) -Wno-redundant-decls -Wno-strict-prototypes -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-shadow -Wno-undef -Wno-switch-default $<
>> -
>> -$(OUTPUT)scripts/perl/Perf-Trace-Util/Context.o: scripts/perl/Perf-Trace-Util/Context.c $(OUTPUT)PERF-CFLAGS
>> - $(QUIET_CC)$(CC) -o $@ -c $(CFLAGS) $(PERL_EMBED_CCOPTS) -Wno-redundant-decls -Wno-strict-prototypes -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-nested-externs -Wno-undef -Wno-switch-default $<
>> -
>> -$(OUTPUT)util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.o: util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c $(OUTPUT)PERF-CFLAGS
>> - $(QUIET_CC)$(CC) -o $@ -c $(CFLAGS) $(PYTHON_EMBED_CCOPTS) -Wno-redundant-decls -Wno-strict-prototypes -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-shadow $<
>> -
>> -$(OUTPUT)scripts/python/Perf-Trace-Util/Context.o: scripts/python/Perf-Trace-Util/Context.c $(OUTPUT)PERF-CFLAGS
>> - $(QUIET_CC)$(CC) -o $@ -c $(CFLAGS) $(PYTHON_EMBED_CCOPTS) -Wno-redundant-decls -Wno-strict-prototypes -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-nested-externs $<
>
> What happened with the trailing -W options in each target above?
> Looks like they've been dropped because I can't find them in the new
> definitions...
I replaced them to a single -w option since all we want to do is
suppress any warning, right?
Thanks,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-23 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-16 2:11 Namhyung Kim
2013-09-20 23:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-23 9:15 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2013-09-23 9:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-09-24 8:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-09-24 17:08 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-09-27 0:38 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-09-21 12:47 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-09-23 9:17 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878uynrjaa.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®