From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: mkoutny@suse.com, axboe@kernel.dk, ming.lei@redhat.com,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] blk-throttle: fix that io throttle can only work for single bio
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 15:44:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8792d3f5-c07f-e080-ae29-b13d0f583f82@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YwMvgN0YxNvkC1gm@slm.duckdns.org>
Hi, Tejun
在 2022/08/22 15:25, Tejun Heo 写道:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:06:44AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> While implementing the new method, I found that there seems to be a
>> misunderstanding here, the code seems to try to add flag to split bio
>> so that it won't be throttled again for bps limit, however:
>>
>> 1) for blk throttle, split bio is issued directly and will never be
>> throttled again, while orignal bio will go through throttle path again.
>> 2) if cloned bio is directed to a new disk, the flag is cleared anyway.
>
> Doesn't that make the current code correct then? But you were seeing
> incorrect behaviors, right?
According to the commit message in commit 111be8839817 ("block-throttle:
avoid double charge"):
If the bio is cloned/split, we copy the flag to new bio too to avoid a
double charge.
Which make me think the split bio will be resubmitted, and after
implementing the new solution, I found that test result is not as
expected. After spending sometime figuring out what is wrong, I found
that split bio will be dispatched directly from caller, while orignal
bio will be resubmitted.
I guess commit 111be8839817 made a mistake, however, there should be
no problem because orignal bio is flagged already, and it's handled
correctly.
Anyway, I removed the code in __bio_clone() and check flag in
__bio_split_to_limits in my patch:
--- a/block/bio.c
+++ b/block/bio.c
@@ -760,8 +760,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_put);
static int __bio_clone(struct bio *bio, struct bio *bio_src, gfp_t gfp)
{
bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_CLONED);
- if (bio_flagged(bio_src, BIO_THROTTLED))
- bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_THROTTLED);
bio->bi_ioprio = bio_src->bi_ioprio;
bio->bi_iter = bio_src->bi_iter;
diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index ff04e9290715..10330bb038ca 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -358,6 +358,13 @@ struct bio *__bio_split_to_limits(struct bio *bio,
struct queue_limits *lim,
blkcg_bio_issue_init(split);
bio_chain(split, bio);
trace_block_split(split, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
+
+ /*
+ * original bio will be resubmited and throttled again,
clear
+ * the iops flag so that it can be count again for iops
limit.
+ */
+ if (bio_flagged(bio, BIO_IOPS_THROTTLED))
+ bio_clear_flag(bio, BIO_IOPS_THROTTLED);
submit_bio_noacct(bio);
return split;
}
>
> Thanks.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-22 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-02 14:04 [PATCH v7 0/9] bugfix and cleanup for blk-throttle Yu Kuai
2022-08-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] blk-throttle: fix that io throttle can only work for single bio Yu Kuai
2022-08-16 19:37 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-17 1:13 ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-17 17:50 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-18 1:23 ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-22 3:06 ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-22 7:25 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-22 7:44 ` Yu Kuai [this message]
2022-08-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] blk-throttle: prevent overflow while calculating wait time Yu Kuai
2022-08-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] blk-throttle: factor out code to calculate ios/bytes_allowed Yu Kuai
2022-08-16 19:47 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-17 1:32 ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] blk-throttle: fix io hung due to configuration updates Yu Kuai
2022-08-16 20:01 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-17 1:30 ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-17 17:52 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-18 1:16 ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-19 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] blk-throttle: improve handling of re-entered bio for bps limit Yu Kuai
2022-08-16 20:02 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] blk-throttle: use 'READ/WRITE' instead of '0/1' Yu Kuai
2022-08-16 20:03 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-17 1:33 ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] blk-throttle: calling throtl_dequeue/enqueue_tg in pairs Yu Kuai
2022-08-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] blk-throttle: cleanup tg_update_disptime() Yu Kuai
2022-08-16 20:09 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-17 1:38 ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] blk-throttle: clean up flag 'THROTL_TG_PENDING' Yu Kuai
2022-08-16 20:14 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-17 1:45 ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-17 17:54 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-18 9:29 ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-19 17:35 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-13 5:59 ` [PATCH v7 0/9] bugfix and cleanup for blk-throttle Yu Kuai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8792d3f5-c07f-e080-ae29-b13d0f583f82@huaweicloud.com \
--to=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®