mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@quicinc.com>,
	Abel Vesa <abelvesa@kernel.org>,
	Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Jagadeesh Kona <jagadeesh.kona@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Taniya Das <taniya.das@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: hamoa: Fix OPP tables for all DisplayPort controllers
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 16:15:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a103cf-d066-4319-ab68-bea3463c0fa2@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6qhpiiroqnpzg44i2j5rgmlw7uaffw4t5z6gv2kgubfoqpktpd@r7h75knlv5a2>

On 3/16/26 3:27 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 10:27:11AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 3/13/26 6:39 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 11:36:26AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> On 3/9/26 3:44 PM, Abel Vesa wrote:
>>>>> According to internal documentation, the corners specific for each rate
>>>>> from the DP link clock are:
>>>>>  - LOWSVS_D1 -> 19.2 MHz
>>>>>  - LOWSVS    -> 270 MHz
>>>>>  - SVS       -> 540 MHz (594 MHz in case of DP3)
>>>>
>>>> This discrepancy sounds a little odd.. can we get some confirmation
>>>> that it's intended and not an internal copypasta? (+Jagadeesh, Taniya)
>>>> FWIW DP3 is not USB4- or MST-capable so it may as well be
>>>
>>> DP3 link_clock is sourced from the eDP PHY. I assume there might some 
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>  - SVS_L1    -> 594 MHz
>>>>>  - NOM       -> 810 MHz
>>>>>  - NOM_L1    -> 810 MHz
>>>>>  - TURBO     -> 810 MHz
>>>>>
>>>>> So fix all tables for each of the four controllers according to the
>>>>> documentation.
>>>>
>>>> It sounds like a good move to instead keep only a single table for
>>>> DP012 and a separate one for DP3 if it's really different
>>>>
>>>>> The 19.2 @ LOWSVS_D1 isn't needed as the controller will select 162 MHz
>>>>> for RBR, which falls under the 270 MHz and it will vote for that LOWSVS
>>>>> in that case.
>>>>
>>>> Even though the Linux OPP framework agrees with that sentiment today (it
>>>> will set the correct rate via clk APIs and the correct rpmh vote for a rate
>>>> that's >= 162), I have mixed feelings about relying on that
>>>
>>> Why? 19.2 isn't an actual working frequency, as far as I can understand
>>> anything. Or is it a working OPP for running "shared" clocks?
>>
>> No, I meant removing the 162 case and relying on OPP to pick up the
>> required-opps value from the next entry
> 
> Isn't it a documented way how the OPP tables work?

yes/no, there's a mention in dev_pm_opp_set_rate():

"""
An OPP entry specifies the highest frequency at which other
of the OPP entry apply. [...]
"""

if you insist, we can rely on it..

Konrad

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-16 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-09 14:44 Abel Vesa
2026-03-09 19:52 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-18 14:22   ` Abel Vesa
2026-03-18 15:09     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-10 10:36 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-03-13 17:39   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-16  9:27     ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-03-16 14:27       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-16 15:15         ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2026-03-16 19:38           ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-17 10:09             ` Viresh Kumar
2026-03-17 15:05               ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-03-17 15:06     ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-03-17 19:14       ` Abel Vesa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a103cf-d066-4319-ab68-bea3463c0fa2@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=abelvesa@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=jagadeesh.kona@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_rjendra@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=taniya.das@oss.qualcomm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®