From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org,
Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl: Resolve missing-field-initializers warnings
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 17:39:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a94szydt.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413286868-21870-1-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> (Jeff Kirsher's message of "Tue, 14 Oct 2014 04:41:08 -0700")
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> writes:
> From: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@intel.com>
>
> Resolve missing-field-initializers warnings in W=2 builds by
> using designated initialization.
ick. No.
That gcc warning makes no sense. In this case heeding it makes the code
significantly uglier and significantly more confusing.
Eric
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
> ---
> kernel/sysctl.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
> index 4aada6d..5623845 100644
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static struct ctl_table sysctl_base_table[] = {
> .mode = 0555,
> .child = dev_table,
> },
> - { }
> + { .procname = NULL }
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
> @@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
> .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
> },
> #endif
> - { }
> + { .procname = NULL }
> };
>
> static struct ctl_table vm_table[] = {
> @@ -1485,12 +1485,12 @@ static struct ctl_table vm_table[] = {
> .mode = 0644,
> .proc_handler = proc_doulongvec_minmax,
> },
> - { }
> + { .procname = NULL }
> };
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC) || defined(CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC_MODULE)
> static struct ctl_table binfmt_misc_table[] = {
> - { }
> + { .procname = NULL }
> };
> #endif
>
> @@ -1658,7 +1658,7 @@ static struct ctl_table fs_table[] = {
> .proc_handler = &pipe_proc_fn,
> .extra1 = &pipe_min_size,
> },
> - { }
> + { .procname = NULL }
> };
>
> static struct ctl_table debug_table[] = {
> @@ -1682,11 +1682,11 @@ static struct ctl_table debug_table[] = {
> .extra2 = &one,
> },
> #endif
> - { }
> + { .procname = NULL }
> };
>
> static struct ctl_table dev_table[] = {
> - { }
> + { .procname = NULL }
> };
>
> int __init sysctl_init(void)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-19 0:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-14 11:41 Jeff Kirsher
2014-10-19 0:39 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2014-10-21 19:07 ` Andrew Morton
2014-10-21 20:34 ` Rustad, Mark D
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a94szydt.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.d.rustad@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®