From: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Martin <pm@debian.org>,
Daniel Silverstone <dsilvers@debian.org>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [3.16.1 BISECTED REGRESSION]: Simtec Entropy Key (cdc-acm) broken in 3.16
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 17:14:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bnok8d5o.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141106170456.GC26196@localhost> (Johan Hovold's message of "Thu, 6 Nov 2014 18:04:56 +0100")
On 6 Nov 2014, Johan Hovold said:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 01:49:13PM +0000, Nix wrote:
>> On 5 Nov 2014, Johan Hovold told this:
>> > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 03:14:49PM +0000, Nix wrote:
>
>> > Could you try two more things (too make sure line control is really the
>> > culprit):
>> >
>> > 1. If you clear HUPCL in ekeyd so that the lines are never lowered, does
>> > that fix the stability issue?
>>
>> Definitely not. I got a hang after the first reboot out of an afflicted
>> kernel, when using a HUPCLless ekeyd. Weird. (I guess they're lowered on
>> reboot anyway?)
>
> It's actually only the timings related to the control-lines being raised
> on open that has changed, so this would seem consistent with that.
Urgh. No wonder it was intermittent.
> Thanks for tracking this down. That bisect cannot have been fun given
> the low failure rate (sometimes only one in ten reboots?).
It often failed quite fast, but yes, the negative case was hard to
prove: I had to rewind twice. I counted reboots because I'm a flaming
aspie pedant. 173 reboots that took... thank goodness it replicated on
the machine of mine that's fastest to reboot!
--
NULL && (void)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-06 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-31 23:07 [3.16.1 " Nix
2014-09-01 11:09 ` Oliver Neukum
2014-09-04 23:40 ` Nix
2014-09-05 7:59 ` Oliver Neukum
2014-09-05 15:17 ` Nix
2014-09-08 7:21 ` Oliver Neukum
2014-09-08 7:58 ` Nix
2014-10-11 19:05 ` [3.16.1 BISECTED " Nix
2014-10-11 19:51 ` Paul Martin
2014-10-11 22:24 ` Nix
2014-10-12 11:14 ` Paul Martin
2014-10-12 18:58 ` Johan Hovold
2014-10-12 21:36 ` Nix
2014-10-14 8:34 ` Johan Hovold
2014-10-14 14:44 ` Nix
2014-10-17 13:21 ` Nix
2014-10-19 13:45 ` Johan Hovold
2014-10-22 9:31 ` Nix
2014-10-22 10:14 ` Johan Hovold
2014-10-22 14:00 ` Nix
2014-10-22 15:36 ` Nix
2014-10-24 11:14 ` Johan Hovold
2014-10-24 15:08 ` Nix
2014-10-31 16:44 ` Nix
2014-11-05 11:56 ` Johan Hovold
2014-11-05 15:14 ` Nix
2014-11-05 15:46 ` Daniel Silverstone
2014-11-05 18:14 ` Johan Hovold
2014-11-06 13:49 ` Nix
2014-11-06 17:04 ` Johan Hovold
2014-11-06 17:08 ` [PATCH] USB: cdc-acm: add quirk for control-line state requests Johan Hovold
2014-11-07 9:05 ` Oliver Neukum
2014-11-07 9:16 ` Johan Hovold
2014-11-07 10:23 ` Oliver Neukum
2014-11-06 17:14 ` Nix [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bnok8d5o.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix \
--to=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=dsilvers@debian.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=pm@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome