From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "Julia Lawall" <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Thomas Meyer" <thomas@m3y3r.de>,
grant.likely@linaro.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] PTR_ERR: return 0 if ptr isn't an error value.
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:14:11 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ehc2rczo.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1306130955380.2260@hadrien>
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> writes:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2013, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 02:07:40PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> > I think using PTR_ERR() is a less bad solution than promoting PTR_RET,
>> > which has a non-obvious name.
>>
>> Will a longer name make the function more obvious?
>> PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() ?
>> PTR_ERR0() ?
>> PTR_ERR() can then stay simple for cases where we know we
>> are on the error path.
>
> I was thinking of something along those lines. And in that case, PTR_ERR
> could stay without the additional test.
> julia
OK, sold :)
Will send out a series now with PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO.
Thanks,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-16 3:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-01 9:56 [PATCH] virtio-mmio: Cocci spatch "ptr_ret.spatch" Thomas Meyer
2013-06-03 2:29 ` [RFC] PTR_ERR: return 0 if ptr isn't an error value Rusty Russell
2013-06-03 7:15 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-06-08 21:07 ` Julia Lawall
2013-06-13 4:37 ` Rusty Russell
2013-06-13 7:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-06-13 7:56 ` Julia Lawall
2013-06-16 2:44 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2013-06-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 1/9] PTR_RET is now PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO Rusty Russell
2013-06-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 2/9] PTR_RET is now PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(): Replace most Rusty Russell
2013-06-20 6:05 ` David Miller
2013-06-25 7:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-06-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 3/9] s390: Replace weird use of PTR_RET Rusty Russell
2013-06-17 5:03 ` Heiko Carstens
2013-06-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 4/9] acpi: " Rusty Russell
2013-06-16 11:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 5/9] pinctrl: don't use PTR_RET() Rusty Russell
2013-06-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 6/9] remoteproc: " Rusty Russell
2013-06-17 3:15 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2013-06-17 3:49 ` Rusty Russell
2013-06-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 7/9] staging/zcache: " Rusty Russell
2013-06-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86: remove weird PTR_ERR() in do_debug Rusty Russell
2013-06-19 18:43 ` [tip:x86/debug] x86: Remove " tip-bot for Rusty Russell
2013-06-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm/oom_kill: remove weird use of ERR_PTR()/PTR_ERR() Rusty Russell
2013-06-16 18:11 ` David Rientjes
2013-06-17 3:50 ` Rusty Russell
2013-06-09 5:55 ` [RFC] PTR_ERR: return 0 if ptr isn't an error value Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ehc2rczo.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=thomas@m3y3r.de \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome