mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcos Del Sol Vives <marcos@orca.pet>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] gpio: vortex: add new GPIO device driver
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 19:05:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87f12a9e-df99-4308-9d4b-6dd28911bd00@orca.pet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250821101902.626329-3-marcos@orca.pet>

El 21/08/2025 a las 12:18, Marcos Del Sol Vives escribió:
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/ioport.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/ioport.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>

I realized now that, despite checking over and over the patches before
sending to the mailing list, I forgot to clean up leftover includes from
previous versions of the driver.

I am fairly new to this procedure of merging patches. Should I later, after
a send a sensible amount of time has passed to let everyone voice their
opinion, send a new v4 version of the patch to fix these (and also clarify
the commit message on the regmap-gpio, as requested in another email),
or if accepted would maybe the person merging it sort this out?

Sorry for the mess,
Marcos

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-21 17:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-21 10:18 [PATCH v3 0/3] Introduce support for Vortex GPIO pins Marcos Del Sol Vives
2025-08-21 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] gpio: gpio-regmap: add flags to control some behaviour Marcos Del Sol Vives
2025-08-21 14:32   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-21 17:14     ` Marcos Del Sol Vives
2025-08-21 16:40   ` Linus Walleij
2025-08-22  7:07     ` Michael Walle
2025-08-22 11:04       ` Marcos Del Sol Vives
2025-08-22  3:27   ` kernel test robot
2025-08-22 11:11     ` Marcos Del Sol Vives
2025-08-21 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] gpio: vortex: add new GPIO device driver Marcos Del Sol Vives
2025-08-21 16:48   ` Linus Walleij
2025-08-21 17:05   ` Marcos Del Sol Vives [this message]
2025-08-22 15:47     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-22 15:49       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-08-22 16:08         ` Marcos Del Sol Vives
2025-08-21 10:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mfd: vortex: implement new driver for Vortex southbridges Marcos Del Sol Vives

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87f12a9e-df99-4308-9d4b-6dd28911bd00@orca.pet \
    --to=marcos@orca.pet \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®