From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Itai Handler <itai.handler@gmail.com>
Cc: mwalle@kernel.org, pratyush@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
vigneshr@ti.com, richard@nod.at, takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mtd: spi-nor: take the flash lock in spi_nor_shutdown()
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 14:15:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fqzcowp9.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914081149.1916589-3-itai.handler@gmail.com> (Itai Handler's message of "Mon, 14 Sep 2026 11:11:48 +0300")
On 14/09/2026 at 11:11:48 +03, Itai Handler <itai.handler@gmail.com> wrote:
> spi_nor_shutdown() calls spi_nor_restore() to put the flash back into
> 3-byte addressing before the system reboots or kexecs. It does so
> without taking nor->lock, which every other path that talks to the chip
> acquires through spi_nor_prep_and_lock().
>
> device_shutdown() does not freeze userspace and does not stop kernel
> threads; it walks the device list calling ->shutdown with all CPUs
> online. Another thread can therefore be in the middle of an operation,
> with the restore running concurrently with it. A write and a read are
> both damaged, in different ways.
>
> A program or erase leaves the flash busy, and a busy flash accepts only
> status register reads and ignores everything else, including the EX4B
> that spi_nor_restore() sends. Neither spi_nor_write_enable() nor
> spi_nor_set_4byte_addr_mode() reads anything back, so the restore
> reports success while the flash is left in 4-byte addressing. The next
> boot stage then addresses it with 3 bytes and reads the wrong data,
> which is the failure commit 59b356ffd0b0 ("mtd: m25p80: restore the
> status of SPI flash when exiting") introduced this restore to prevent.
>
> A read, by contrast, does not ignore the restore - it is corrupted by
> it. spi_nor_read() holds the lock across a loop that issues one
> spi_nor_read_data() per chunk, each using nor->addr_nbytes.
> spi_nor_set_4byte_addr_mode() updates nor->params->addr_nbytes and not
> nor->addr_nbytes, so a restore landing between two chunks switches the
> chip to 3-byte addressing while the driver carries on sending 4 address
> bytes. The rest of the transfer is addressed wrongly and returns wrong
> data, and nothing reports an error. A restore may also soft reset the
> chip in the middle of that same read.
>
> Take nor->lock for the restore, so it runs between operations instead of
> during one: a program or erase has finished waiting on the chip, and a
> read has issued its last chunk. This is a locking fix rather than a
> missing wait - each operation already waits for completion at the site
> that started it.
>
> This narrows the race without closing it. The restore still runs while
> MTD users are attached, so an operation that starts after it has
> completed will address a chip that is now in 3-byte mode while
> nor->addr_nbytes is still 4. Closing that as well would mean having MTD
> stop accepting operations before ->shutdown runs, which is a larger
> change; serialising against the operations already in flight is what
> keeps the restore itself from being issued into a busy chip.
6 paragraphs to tell "Accesses to the flash should be
serialized". Please reduce it.
> Fixes: 59b356ffd0b0 ("mtd: m25p80: restore the status of SPI flash when exiting")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Itai Handler <itai.handler@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> index 8bc117b46e02..647bf8dce719 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> @@ -3862,8 +3862,21 @@ static int spi_nor_remove(struct spi_mem *spimem)
> static void spi_nor_shutdown(struct spi_mem *spimem)
> {
> struct spi_nor *nor = spi_mem_get_drvdata(spimem);
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * Wait for an operation started by another thread to finish.
> + * device_shutdown() runs with MTD users still active: a busy flash
> + * ignores the commands spi_nor_restore() issues, leaving it in
> + * 4-byte address mode, and a restore landing mid-read changes the
> + * chip's address width under the transfer.
> + */
I'm fine with the diff, but please drop this comment.
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 8:11 [PATCH v2 0/3] mtd: spi-nor: fix the unlocked restore on shutdown and remove Itai Handler
2026-09-14 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: spi-nor: fix the lock left held by spi_nor_rww_start_exclusive() Itai Handler
2026-09-14 8:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 12:09 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-09-14 12:20 ` Michael Walle
2026-09-14 12:34 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-09-14 12:41 ` Michael Walle
2026-09-14 13:11 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-09-14 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mtd: spi-nor: take the flash lock in spi_nor_shutdown() Itai Handler
2026-09-14 8:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 12:15 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2026-09-14 8:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mtd: spi-nor: take the flash lock in spi_nor_remove() Itai Handler
2026-09-14 8:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 12:19 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fqzcowp9.fsf@bootlin.com \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=itai.handler@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®