mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@ozlabs.org>
To: Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Comrade DOS <suloevdmitry@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH: 1/1] ACPI: make evaluation of thermal trip points before temperature or vice versa dependant on new "temp_b4_trip" module parameter to support older AMD x86_64s
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:36:48 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hatgqy1z.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALyZvKxP793Qq5-SHt1ExfivHWhNeMOgVWD6qDsQ0kjEBOA96w@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 19:16:24 +0100, Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Rusty - sorry I didn't see your email until now - revised patch
> addressing your comments attached -
> BTW,  sorry about the word wrap on the initial posting - should I
> attach a '.patch' file or inline ?  Trying both .

The inline one was wrapped.

> +static int thermal_temp_b4_trip(const struct dmi_system_id *d) {
> +
> +       printk(KERN_NOTICE "ACPI: %s detected: : "
> +                           "getting temperature before trip point
> initialisation\n", d->ident);
> +       temp_b4_trip = TRUE;
> +       return 0;
> +}

TRUE?  true is standard with stdbool.h.

The patch itself looks reasonable, but it's not my area: I just spotted
the module_param() abuse :)

Cheers,
Rusty.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-10  0:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-08 18:50 Jason Vas Dias
2012-07-09  0:30 ` Rusty Russell
2012-07-09 18:16   ` Jason Vas Dias
2012-07-10  0:06     ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2012-07-14 11:45 Jason Vas Dias

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87hatgqy1z.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com \
    --cc=jason.vas.dias@gmail.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg@redhat.com \
    --cc=suloevdmitry@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome