* Oopses
@ 2002-08-05 23:00 Gregory Stark
2002-08-06 0:23 ` Oopses Alan Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gregory Stark @ 2002-08-05 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I received these two oopses recently running 2.4.17. Is this a known bug?
Is it fixed in 2.4.18?
Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address e0f390e8
Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: printing eip:
Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: c0140cfc
Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: *pde = 00000000
Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: Oops: 0002
Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: CPU: 0
Aug 5 17:43:08 stark kernel: EIP: 0010:[get_empty_inode+44/160] Tainted: PF
Aug 5 17:43:08 stark kernel: EFLAGS: 00210206
Aug 5 17:43:08 stark kernel: eax: e0f390e8 ebx: e0f390e0 ecx: c2f390a0 edx: c2f39e08
Aug 5 17:43:08 stark kernel: esi: c3c11b00 edi: bf7ffa2c ebp: bf7ffa2c esp: ce463eec
Aug 5 17:43:08 stark kernel: ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
Aug 5 17:43:08 stark kernel: Process xmms (pid: 15864, stackpage=ce463000)
Aug 5 17:43:08 stark kernel: Stack: 00000004 c0195e76 00000004 c0196a8d 00000004 bf7ff9e8 bf7ffa2c bf7ff674
Aug 5 17:43:08 stark kernel: ce463f70 ffffffe8 c1040000 00200202 ffffffff 00000829 c012a6ab c012a6ca
Aug 5 17:43:08 stark kernel: c013ba2a 00000000 cbc204a0 00000001 c013bd38 ce463f68 00000001 00000004
Aug 5 17:43:08 stark kernel: Call Trace: [sock_alloc+6/192] [sys_accept+61/256] [__free_pages+27/32] [free_pages+26/32] [poll_freewait+58/80]
Aug 5 17:43:08 stark kernel: [do_select+440/464] [select_bits_free+10/16] [sys_select+1151/1168] [sys_socketcall+188/528] [system_call+51/64]
Aug 5 17:43:08 stark kernel:
Aug 5 17:43:08 stark kernel: Code: 89 53 08 c7 40 04 dc c5 20 c0 a3 dc c5 20 c0 c7 83 98 00 00
Aug 5 17:43:14 stark kernel: <1>Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 1f052a68
Aug 5 17:43:14 stark kernel: printing eip:
Aug 5 17:43:14 stark kernel: c0140cfc
Aug 5 17:43:14 stark kernel: *pde = 00000000
Aug 5 17:43:14 stark kernel: Oops: 0002
Aug 5 17:43:14 stark kernel: CPU: 0
Aug 5 17:43:14 stark kernel: EIP: 0010:[get_empty_inode+44/160] Tainted: PF
Aug 5 17:43:14 stark kernel: EFLAGS: 00210202
Aug 5 17:43:14 stark kernel: eax: 1f052a68 ebx: 1f052a60 ecx: c2f390a0 edx: cf794878
Aug 5 17:43:14 stark kernel: esi: 00000008 edi: c027eda0 ebp: 00000002 esp: c88bbf38
Aug 5 17:43:14 stark kernel: ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
Aug 5 17:43:14 stark kernel: Process zwgc (pid: 910, stackpage=c88bb000)
Aug 5 17:43:14 stark kernel: Stack: 00000002 c0195e76 00000002 c019677d 00000002 3d4ef172 0805ee00 bffff95c
Aug 5 17:43:14 stark kernel: c88ba000 00200286 00000000 cff715b4 bffffa40 00000000 c013bd7a cff715a0
Aug 5 17:43:14 stark kernel: c01967ed 00000002 00000002 00000000 c88bbf90 00000000 0805ee00 c01974ec
Aug 5 17:43:14 stark kernel: Call Trace: [sock_alloc+6/192] [sock_create+173/256] [select_bits_free+10/16] [sys_socket+29/96] [sys_socketcall+108/528]
Aug 5 17:43:14 stark kernel: [system_call+51/64]
Aug 5 17:43:14 stark kernel:
Aug 5 17:43:14 stark kernel: Code: 89 53 08 c7 40 04 dc c5 20 c0 a3 dc c5 20 c0 c7 83 98 00 00
--
greg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Oopses
2002-08-05 23:00 Oopses Gregory Stark
@ 2002-08-06 0:23 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-05 23:24 ` Oopses Greg Stark
2002-08-06 0:06 ` Oopses Greg Stark
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2002-08-06 0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gregory Stark; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Tue, 2002-08-06 at 00:00, Gregory Stark wrote:
>
> I received these two oopses recently running 2.4.17. Is this a known bug?
> Is it fixed in 2.4.18?
>
> Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address e0f390e8
> Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: printing eip:
> Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: c0140cfc
> Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: *pde = 00000000
> Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: Oops: 0002
> Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: CPU: 0
> Aug 5 17:43:08 stark kernel: EIP: 0010:[get_empty_inode+44/160] Tainted: PF
What binary modules are you running, and what did you use insmod -f on ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Oopses
2002-08-06 0:23 ` Oopses Alan Cox
@ 2002-08-05 23:24 ` Greg Stark
2002-08-06 0:06 ` Oopses Greg Stark
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg Stark @ 2002-08-05 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: Gregory Stark, linux-kernel
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:
> On Tue, 2002-08-06 at 00:00, Gregory Stark wrote:
> >
> > I received these two oopses recently running 2.4.17. Is this a known bug?
> > Is it fixed in 2.4.18?
> >
> > Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address e0f390e8
> > Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: printing eip:
> > Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: c0140cfc
> > Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: *pde = 00000000
> > Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: Oops: 0002
> > Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: CPU: 0
> > Aug 5 17:43:08 stark kernel: EIP: 0010:[get_empty_inode+44/160] Tainted: PF
>
> What binary modules are you running, and what did you use insmod -f on ?
>
These modules are loaded. I wasn't running vmware at the time though.
Module Size Used by Tainted: PF
sr_mod 12312 0 (autoclean)
vmnet 20544 4
vmmon 19860 0 (unused)
openafs 403840 2
parport_pc 25608 1 (autoclean)
lp 5984 0 (autoclean)
parport 24992 1 (autoclean) [parport_pc lp]
serial 49696 0 (autoclean)
ide-scsi 7648 0
scsi_mod 50348 2 [sr_mod ide-scsi]
pppoe 6880 8
pppox 1160 1 [pppoe]
ppp_generic 15208 3 [pppoe pppox]
slhc 4512 0 [ppp_generic]
3c59x 24872 1
ne2k-pci 4832 1
8390 5984 0 [ne2k-pci]
rtc 5624 0 (autoclean)
--
greg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Oopses
2002-08-06 0:23 ` Oopses Alan Cox
2002-08-05 23:24 ` Oopses Greg Stark
@ 2002-08-06 0:06 ` Greg Stark
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg Stark @ 2002-08-06 0:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: Gregory Stark, linux-kernel
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:
> What binary modules are you running, and what did you use insmod -f on ?
My answer was:
> These modules are loaded. I wasn't running vmware at the time though.
To clarify, and to answer the question you actually asked, None of the modules
loaded were received as binary modules. I compiled them all myself from source
with this kernel's build tree. While the init.d scripts appear to use insmod
-f in fact the modules load just fine with insmod/modprobe without the -f.
--
greg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-08-06 0:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-08-05 23:00 Oopses Gregory Stark
2002-08-06 0:23 ` Oopses Alan Cox
2002-08-05 23:24 ` Oopses Greg Stark
2002-08-06 0:06 ` Oopses Greg Stark
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®