mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* conformance, compliance and compatibility
@ 2004-01-30 22:49 Esben Stien
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Esben Stien @ 2004-01-30 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

I remember to have read that ISO has standardized on using
conformance for everything that is conforming to a specific
standard but I can't find it again. Anyone know where I could
look?

AFAIK, this is my understanding of these words

Conformance has a deep root different meaning than compliance,
but today that difference is not clear. However, ISO has
standardized on using the word conformance and not compliance
when saying something conforms to a standard. 

Compatibility is for hardware. You can say that a specific
piece of hardware is compatible with another piece of hardware
cause it speaks the same protocol. Compatibility is a way of
saying that two components uses the same interfaces. 

You can not call a system unix today, cause unix today is a
standard. The last unix was sysv. You can however say a system
is conforming to unix (iso posix unix)(ieee 1003.1), so it is a
unix conformant system. (to be technically correct). 

Is there any document that clarifies these words better. I'm
looking for some official documentation from a standards body
like ISO, IEC etc. 

I also see the words comformance and compliance used
interchangably in RFC's,  but to my knowledge I think I remember
that RFC's where also supposed to be using conformance 

-- 
b0ef


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-01-30 23:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-30 22:49 conformance, compliance and compatibility Esben Stien

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome