* 2.4.21-pre2 IDE problems
@ 2002-12-31 12:18 Marijn Ros
2002-12-31 16:59 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marijn Ros @ 2002-12-31 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi all,
My (old, but still newest) machine has a UM8886A south bridge with IDE
controller. This chip is not supported and therefor runs at PIO mode
0, yielding a whopping 2MB/s throughput with the normal (old) 2.4 IDE
code.
However, when I try the new 2.4.21-pre2 taskfile IO setting, I get a
'hda: lost interrupt' message every 30 seconds (the timeout period I
guess) during disk IO, making the machine unusable. I know this
setting is experimental, but I guess you would like to know about my
problems before the old code is phased out completely.
I understood that taskfile IO is a backport of 2.5 code, so I decided
to try 2.5.53 too. Strangely, it doesn't loose IDE interrupts, but
seems to loose clock interrupts during disk IO, as ntpd looses sync
(0.6-1.2s per 20 minutes) during a kernel compile but not during
normal usage (web-browsing and e-mail on an otherwise idle
system). Setting kernel preemtion doesn't make a difference (don't
know why I decided to test that anymore).
I am not on this list, but plan to read the archives avery day. If
more information is needed, please CC me so I can send a proper reply.
Bye,
Marijn
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: 2.4.21-pre2 IDE problems
2002-12-31 12:18 2.4.21-pre2 IDE problems Marijn Ros
@ 2002-12-31 16:59 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2002-12-31 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marijn Ros; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 12:18, Marijn Ros wrote:
> However, when I try the new 2.4.21-pre2 taskfile IO setting, I get a
> 'hda: lost interrupt' message every 30 seconds (the timeout period I
> guess) during disk IO, making the machine unusable. I know this
> setting is experimental, but I guess you would like to know about my
> problems before the old code is phased out completely.
Taskfile I/O as opposed to ioctl is broken for PIO. I know about this
and I've disabled it. I don't plan to fix that path for 2.4 but to keep
the old read/write paths to reduce risk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-12-31 16:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-12-31 12:18 2.4.21-pre2 IDE problems Marijn Ros
2002-12-31 16:59 ` Alan Cox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®