mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Don't check for highest perf matching on prefcore
@ 2024-07-02 17:15 Mario Limonciello
  2024-07-02 17:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Don't fail boost test case if CPB isn't supported Mario Limonciello
  2024-07-03  8:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Don't check for highest perf matching on prefcore Gautham R.Shenoy
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mario Limonciello @ 2024-07-02 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gautham R . Shenoy
  Cc: Meng Li, Perry Yuan, open list:AMD PSTATE DRIVER, open list,
	Dhananjay Ugwekar, Mario Limonciello

If a system is using preferred cores the highest perf will be inconsistent
as it can change from system events.

Skip the checks for it.

Fixes: e571a5e2068e ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Update amd-pstate preferred core ranking dynamically")
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
index 66b73c308ce6..b7318669485e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
@@ -160,14 +160,17 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
 			lowest_perf = AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF(cap1);
 		}
 
-		if ((highest_perf != READ_ONCE(cpudata->highest_perf)) ||
-			(nominal_perf != READ_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_perf)) ||
+		if (highest_perf != READ_ONCE(cpudata->highest_perf) && !cpudata->hw_prefcore) {
+			pr_err("%s cpu%d highest=%d %d highest perf doesn't match\n",
+				__func__, cpu, highest_perf, cpudata->highest_perf);
+			goto skip_test;
+		}
+		if ((nominal_perf != READ_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_perf)) ||
 			(lowest_nonlinear_perf != READ_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_perf)) ||
 			(lowest_perf != READ_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_perf))) {
 			amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
-			pr_err("%s cpu%d highest=%d %d nominal=%d %d lowest_nonlinear=%d %d lowest=%d %d, they should be equal!\n",
-				__func__, cpu, highest_perf, cpudata->highest_perf,
-				nominal_perf, cpudata->nominal_perf,
+			pr_err("%s cpu%d nominal=%d %d lowest_nonlinear=%d %d lowest=%d %d, they should be equal!\n",
+				__func__, cpu, nominal_perf, cpudata->nominal_perf,
 				lowest_nonlinear_perf, cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_perf,
 				lowest_perf, cpudata->lowest_perf);
 			goto skip_test;
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-07-03  9:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-07-02 17:15 [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Don't check for highest perf matching on prefcore Mario Limonciello
2024-07-02 17:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Don't fail boost test case if CPB isn't supported Mario Limonciello
2024-07-03  8:58   ` Gautham R.Shenoy
2024-07-03  8:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Don't check for highest perf matching on prefcore Gautham R.Shenoy

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®