* [PATCH] ALSA: seq: Wait for one RCU grace period when deleting all ports
@ 2026-10-10 22:25 Ali Ahmet Memiş
2026-10-11 8:49 ` Takashi Iwai
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ali Ahmet Memiş @ 2026-10-10 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Takashi Iwai, Jaroslav Kysela; +Cc: linux-sound, linux-kernel
Since the port list was converted to RCU, snd_seq_delete_all_ports()
calls synchronize_rcu() once per port under register_mutex. Closing a
client with 254 ports now takes about 1.6s and every other client
open or close waits for it.
Unlink all ports first, wait for a single grace period and then free
them.
Fixes: 4c252fbc06d6 ("ALSA: seq: Use RCU for the client port list")
Signed-off-by: Ali Ahmet Memiş <aliamemis@disroot.org>
---
Tested in QEMU on v7.3 with lockdep and KASAN. Closing a client
with 254 ports went from ~1.6s to ~0.02s, and a second client doing
open/close in a loop no longer stalls. Closing the client while other
clients send to and query its ports ran 100 rounds without reports.
sound/core/seq/seq_ports.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
sound/core/seq/seq_ports.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/core/seq/seq_ports.c b/sound/core/seq/seq_ports.c
index eb67eb0ee..b582d0344 100644
--- a/sound/core/seq/seq_ports.c
+++ b/sound/core/seq/seq_ports.c
@@ -248,17 +248,9 @@ static void clear_subscriber_list(struct snd_seq_client *client,
}
/* delete port data */
-static int port_delete(struct snd_seq_client *client,
- struct snd_seq_client_port *port)
+static void port_free(struct snd_seq_client *client,
+ struct snd_seq_client_port *port)
{
- /* set closing flag and wait for all port access are gone */
- port->closing = 1;
- /* the port has already been unlinked from the client's port list;
- * wait for a grace period so that RCU readers still traversing the
- * list can no longer take a new use_lock reference, then drain the
- * outstanding references before freeing
- */
- synchronize_rcu();
snd_use_lock_sync(&port->use_lock);
/* clear subscribers info */
@@ -272,6 +264,20 @@ static int port_delete(struct snd_seq_client *client,
snd_BUG_ON(port->c_dest.count != 0);
kfree(port);
+}
+
+static int port_delete(struct snd_seq_client *client,
+ struct snd_seq_client_port *port)
+{
+ /* set closing flag and wait for all port access are gone */
+ port->closing = 1;
+ /* the port has already been unlinked from the client's port list;
+ * wait for a grace period so that RCU readers still traversing the
+ * list can no longer take a new use_lock reference, then drain the
+ * outstanding references before freeing
+ */
+ synchronize_rcu();
+ port_free(client, port);
return 0;
}
@@ -302,18 +308,25 @@ int snd_seq_delete_port(struct snd_seq_client *client, int port)
int snd_seq_delete_all_ports(struct snd_seq_client *client)
{
struct snd_seq_client_port *port, *tmp;
+ LIST_HEAD(deleted);
- /* unlink and delete each port; port_delete() waits for an RCU grace
- * period before draining the port, so concurrent lockless readers can
- * no longer take a new use_lock reference on it
+ /* unlink all ports first and wait for a single RCU grace period
+ * before draining and freeing them, so concurrent lockless readers
+ * can no longer take a new use_lock reference on any of them
*/
guard(mutex)(&client->ports_mutex);
list_for_each_entry_safe(port, tmp, &client->ports_list_head, list) {
list_del_rcu(&port->list);
client->num_ports--;
+ port->closing = 1;
+ list_add_tail(&port->delete_list, &deleted);
snd_seq_system_client_ev_port_exit(port->addr.client, port->addr.port);
- port_delete(client, port);
}
+ if (list_empty(&deleted))
+ return 0;
+ synchronize_rcu();
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(port, tmp, &deleted, delete_list)
+ port_free(client, port);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/sound/core/seq/seq_ports.h b/sound/core/seq/seq_ports.h
index 12ad86bf1..ef1787d6c 100644
--- a/sound/core/seq/seq_ports.h
+++ b/sound/core/seq/seq_ports.h
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ struct snd_seq_client_port {
struct module *owner; /* owner of this port */
char name[64]; /* port name */
struct list_head list; /* port list */
+ struct list_head delete_list; /* used by snd_seq_delete_all_ports() */
snd_use_lock_t use_lock;
/* subscribers */
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ALSA: seq: Wait for one RCU grace period when deleting all ports
2026-10-10 22:25 [PATCH] ALSA: seq: Wait for one RCU grace period when deleting all ports Ali Ahmet Memiş
@ 2026-10-11 8:49 ` Takashi Iwai
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Takashi Iwai @ 2026-10-11 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ali Ahmet Memiş
Cc: Takashi Iwai, Jaroslav Kysela, linux-sound, linux-kernel
On Sun, 11 Oct 2026 00:25:40 +0200,
Ali Ahmet Memiş wrote:
>
> Since the port list was converted to RCU, snd_seq_delete_all_ports()
> calls synchronize_rcu() once per port under register_mutex. Closing a
> client with 254 ports now takes about 1.6s and every other client
> open or close waits for it.
>
> Unlink all ports first, wait for a single grace period and then free
> them.
>
> Fixes: 4c252fbc06d6 ("ALSA: seq: Use RCU for the client port list")
> Signed-off-by: Ali Ahmet Memiş <aliamemis@disroot.org>
> ---
> Tested in QEMU on v7.3 with lockdep and KASAN. Closing a client
> with 254 ports went from ~1.6s to ~0.02s, and a second client doing
> open/close in a loop no longer stalls. Closing the client while other
> clients send to and query its ports ran 100 rounds without reports.
Applied now to for-next branch.
Sounds like a good performance improvement.
thanks,
Takashi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-11 8:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-10 22:25 [PATCH] ALSA: seq: Wait for one RCU grace period when deleting all ports Ali Ahmet Memiş
2026-10-11 8:49 ` Takashi Iwai
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®