From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] perf report: Add --percentage option
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:37:14 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mwhhvwx1.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140220103950.GA11018@krava.brq.redhat.com> (Jiri Olsa's message of "Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:39:50 +0100")
Hi Jiri,
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:39:50 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:47:20AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> The --percentage option is for controlling overhead percentage
>> displayed. It can only receive either of "relative" or "absolute".
>>
>> "relative" means it's relative to filtered entries only so that the
>> sum of shown entries will be always 100%. "absolute" means it retains
>> the original value before and after the filter is applied.
>
> SNIP
>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
>> index 78f4c92e9b73..714f3f00ea55 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
>> @@ -21,10 +21,13 @@ static int __hpp__fmt(struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he,
>>
>> if (fmt_percent) {
>> double percent = 0.0;
>> + u64 total = hists->stats.total_period;
>>
>> - if (hists->stats.total_period)
>> - percent = 100.0 * get_field(he) /
>> - hists->stats.total_period;
>> + if (symbol_conf.filter_relative)
>> + total = hists->stats.total_filtered_period;
>> +
>> + if (total)
>> + percent = 100.0 * get_field(he) / total;
>>
>> ret = print_fn(hpp->buf, hpp->size, fmt, percent);
>> } else
>> @@ -41,6 +44,9 @@ static int __hpp__fmt(struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he,
>> u64 period = get_field(pair);
>> u64 total = pair->hists->stats.total_period;
>>
>> + if (symbol_conf.filter_relative)
>> + total = pair->hists->stats.total_filtered_period;
>> +
>> if (!total)
>> continue;
>
> looks like we could use something like:
>
> perf_hists__total_period(hists)
> {
> u64 total = hists->stats.total_period;
>
> if (symbol_conf.filter_relative)
> total = hists->stats.total_filtered_period;
>
> return total;
> }
>
> probably on other places as well
Right! Will change.
Thanks,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-24 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-10 2:47 [PATCHSET 0/8] perf tools: Update on filtered entries' percentage output (v4) Namhyung Kim
2014-02-10 2:47 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf tools: Count periods of filtered entries separately Namhyung Kim
2014-02-10 2:47 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf hists: Add support for showing relative percentage Namhyung Kim
2014-02-10 2:47 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf report: Add --percentage option Namhyung Kim
2014-02-20 10:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-02-24 6:37 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2014-02-10 2:47 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf top: " Namhyung Kim
2014-02-20 10:44 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-02-24 6:37 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-02-10 2:47 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf diff: " Namhyung Kim
2014-02-20 10:47 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-02-20 10:49 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-02-10 2:47 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf tools: Add hist.percentage config option Namhyung Kim
2014-02-20 11:01 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-02-24 6:41 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-02-10 2:47 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf tools: Show absolute percentage by default Namhyung Kim
2014-02-10 3:00 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-02-10 2:47 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf ui/tui: Add 'F' hotkey to toggle percentage output Namhyung Kim
2014-02-20 10:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-02-24 7:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-02-10 2:47 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf tools: Show absolute percentage by default Namhyung Kim
2014-02-20 1:00 ` [PATCHSET 0/8] perf tools: Update on filtered entries' percentage output (v4) Namhyung Kim
2014-02-24 8:09 [PATCHSET 0/8] perf tools: Update on filtered entries' percentage output (v5) Namhyung Kim
2014-02-24 8:09 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf report: Add --percentage option Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mwhhvwx1.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome