* [PATCH ath-next] wifi: ath9k: release the LED GPIO after ath9k_stop()
@ 2026-10-22 2:23 Rosen Penev
2026-10-23 15:30 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rosen Penev @ 2026-10-22 2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wireless
Cc: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen, Linus Walleij,
Bartosz Golaszewski, Giedrius Statkevičius, Kalle Valo,
open list,
open list:GPIO
SUBSYSTEM:Keyword:(devm_)?gpio_(request|free|direction|get|set)
ath9k_deinit_device() frees the LED pin in ath_deinit_leds() before it
unregisters the hw. ath9k_stop() then switches the LED pin back to an
input with ath9k_hw_gpio_request_in(). For a SoC GPIO outside of the
WMAC, ath9k_hw_gpio_request() takes a new descriptor through
gpiod_get_index() at that point, and nothing releases it again. The
next probe fails with "request GPIO12 failed:-16" and every LED update
hits the WARN_ON() in ath9k_hw_set_gpio(). That request also runs
under sc->sc_pcu_lock, while gpiod_get_index() and
gpiod_set_consumer_name() may sleep.
Free the LED pin after ieee80211_unregister_hw() instead. This also
frees the pin when the LED class device could not be registered,
which leaked it before.
Seen on a TP-Link Archer C7 v2 (QCA9558, LED on SoC GPIO 12) when
reloading ath9k.
Fixes: e34f2ff40e03 ("ath9k: bring back direction setting in ath9k_{start_stop}")
Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/gpio.c | 2 --
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/gpio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/gpio.c
index 2dbc7efdd637..d525d8ef9369 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/gpio.c
@@ -67,8 +67,6 @@ void ath_deinit_leds(struct ath_softc *sc)
ath_led_brightness(&sc->led_cdev, LED_OFF);
led_classdev_unregister(&sc->led_cdev);
-
- ath9k_hw_gpio_free(sc->sc_ah, sc->sc_ah->led_pin);
}
void ath_init_leds(struct ath_softc *sc)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c
index a7a11781d83d..f6aa2ec1683c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c
@@ -1128,6 +1128,11 @@ void ath9k_deinit_device(struct ath_softc *sc)
ath9k_deinit_debug(sc);
ath9k_deinit_wow(hw);
ieee80211_unregister_hw(hw);
+
+ /* release the LED pin only after ath9k_stop() has configured it */
+ if (sc->sc_ah->led_pin >= 0)
+ ath9k_hw_gpio_free(sc->sc_ah, sc->sc_ah->led_pin);
+
ath_rx_cleanup(sc);
ath9k_deinit_softc(sc);
}
--
2.56.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH ath-next] wifi: ath9k: release the LED GPIO after ath9k_stop()
2026-10-22 2:23 [PATCH ath-next] wifi: ath9k: release the LED GPIO after ath9k_stop() Rosen Penev
@ 2026-10-23 15:30 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2026-10-23 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rosen Penev, linux-wireless
Cc: Linus Walleij, Bartosz Golaszewski, Giedrius Statkevičius,
Kalle Valo, open list,
open list:GPIO
SUBSYSTEM:Keyword:(devm_)?gpio_(request|free|direction|get|set)
Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com> writes:
> ath9k_deinit_device() frees the LED pin in ath_deinit_leds() before it
> unregisters the hw. ath9k_stop() then switches the LED pin back to an
> input with ath9k_hw_gpio_request_in(). For a SoC GPIO outside of the
> WMAC, ath9k_hw_gpio_request() takes a new descriptor through
> gpiod_get_index() at that point, and nothing releases it again. The
> next probe fails with "request GPIO12 failed:-16" and every LED update
> hits the WARN_ON() in ath9k_hw_set_gpio(). That request also runs
> under sc->sc_pcu_lock, while gpiod_get_index() and
> gpiod_set_consumer_name() may sleep.
>
> Free the LED pin after ieee80211_unregister_hw() instead. This also
> frees the pin when the LED class device could not be registered,
> which leaked it before.
Hmm, instead of reworking the deinit code, how about we just drop the
ath9k_hw_gpio_request_in() call from ath9k_stop()? It's an LED pin, why
would it ever need to be reset? The commit that introduced that call
says it was "for consistency", which seems entirely bogus in this case?
-Toke
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-23 15:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-22 2:23 [PATCH ath-next] wifi: ath9k: release the LED GPIO after ath9k_stop() Rosen Penev
2026-10-23 15:30 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®