[PATCH v1 1/2] KVM: arm: plug guest debug exploit

[PATCH v1 1/2] KVM: arm: plug guest debug exploit

[Alex Bennée]

From: Zhichao Huang <zhichao.huang@linaro.org>

Hardware debugging in guests is not intercepted currently, it means
that a malicious guest can bring down the entire machine by writing
to the debug registers.

This patch enable trapping of all debug registers, preventing the
guests to access the debug registers. This includes access to the
debug mode(DBGDSCR) in the guest world all the time which could
otherwise mess with the host state. Reads return 0 and writes are
ignored.

The result is the guest cannot detect any working hardware based debug
support. As debug exceptions are still routed to the guest normal
debug using software based breakpoints still works.

To support debugging using hardware registers we need to implement a
debug register aware world switch as well as special trapping for
registers that may affect the host state.

Signed-off-by: Zhichao Huang <zhichao.huang@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

---
ajb:
  - convert to C world switch
  - reword commit message
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h |  3 +-
 arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c             | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c        |  4 +-
 arch/arm/kvm/hyp/switch.c         |  4 +-
 4 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h
index 4917c2f7e459..e74ab0fbab79 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h
@@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ void kvm_register_target_coproc_table(struct kvm_coproc_target_table *table);
 int kvm_handle_cp10_id(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
 int kvm_handle_cp_0_13_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
 int kvm_handle_cp14_load_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
-int kvm_handle_cp14_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
+int kvm_handle_cp14_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
+int kvm_handle_cp14_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
 int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
 int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
index 3e5e4194ef86..b2053393bb1f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
@@ -93,12 +93,6 @@ int kvm_handle_cp14_load_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 	return 1;
 }
 
-int kvm_handle_cp14_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
-{
-	kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
-	return 1;
-}
-
 static void reset_mpidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct coproc_reg *r)
 {
 	/*
@@ -514,12 +508,8 @@ static int emulate_cp15(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return 1;
 }
 
-/**
- * kvm_handle_cp15_64 -- handles a mrrc/mcrr trap on a guest CP15 access
- * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
- * @run:  The kvm_run struct
- */
-int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
+static int kvm_handle_cp_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
+			    bool cp15)
 {
 	struct coproc_params params;
 
@@ -533,7 +523,35 @@ int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 	params.Rt2 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 10) & 0xf;
 	params.CRm = 0;
 
-	return emulate_cp15(vcpu, &params);
+	if (cp15)
+		return emulate_cp15(vcpu, &params);
+
+	/* raz_wi cp14 */
+	(void)pm_fake(vcpu, &params, NULL);
+
+	/* handled */
+	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
+	return 1;
+}
+
+/**
+ * kvm_handle_cp15_64 -- handles a mrrc/mcrr trap on a guest CP15 access
+ * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
+ * @run:  The kvm_run struct
+ */
+int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
+{
+	return kvm_handle_cp_64(vcpu, run, 1);
+}
+
+/**
+ * kvm_handle_cp14_64 -- handles a mrrc/mcrr trap on a guest CP14 access
+ * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
+ * @run:  The kvm_run struct
+ */
+int kvm_handle_cp14_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
+{
+	return kvm_handle_cp_64(vcpu, run, 0);
 }
 
 static void reset_coproc_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
@@ -546,12 +564,8 @@ static void reset_coproc_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			table[i].reset(vcpu, &table[i]);
 }
 
-/**
- * kvm_handle_cp15_32 -- handles a mrc/mcr trap on a guest CP15 access
- * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
- * @run:  The kvm_run struct
- */
-int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
+static int kvm_handle_cp_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
+			      bool cp15)
 {
 	struct coproc_params params;
 
@@ -565,7 +579,35 @@ int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 	params.Op2 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 17) & 0x7;
 	params.Rt2 = 0;
 
-	return emulate_cp15(vcpu, &params);
+	if (cp15)
+		return emulate_cp15(vcpu, &params);
+
+	/* raz_wi cp14 */
+	(void)pm_fake(vcpu, &params, NULL);
+
+	/* handled */
+	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
+	return 1;
+}
+
+/**
+ * kvm_handle_cp15_32 -- handles a mrc/mcr trap on a guest CP15 access
+ * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
+ * @run:  The kvm_run struct
+ */
+int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
+{
+	return kvm_handle_cp_32(vcpu, run, 1);
+}
+
+/**
+ * kvm_handle_cp14_32 -- handles a mrc/mcr trap on a guest CP14 access
+ * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
+ * @run:  The kvm_run struct
+ */
+int kvm_handle_cp14_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
+{
+	return kvm_handle_cp_32(vcpu, run, 0);
 }
 
 /******************************************************************************
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
index 96af65a30d78..42f5daf715d0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -95,9 +95,9 @@ static exit_handle_fn arm_exit_handlers[] = {
 	[HSR_EC_WFI]		= kvm_handle_wfx,
 	[HSR_EC_CP15_32]	= kvm_handle_cp15_32,
 	[HSR_EC_CP15_64]	= kvm_handle_cp15_64,
-	[HSR_EC_CP14_MR]	= kvm_handle_cp14_access,
+	[HSR_EC_CP14_MR]	= kvm_handle_cp14_32,
 	[HSR_EC_CP14_LS]	= kvm_handle_cp14_load_store,
-	[HSR_EC_CP14_64]	= kvm_handle_cp14_access,
+	[HSR_EC_CP14_64]	= kvm_handle_cp14_64,
 	[HSR_EC_CP_0_13]	= kvm_handle_cp_0_13_access,
 	[HSR_EC_CP10_ID]	= kvm_handle_cp10_id,
 	[HSR_EC_HVC]		= handle_hvc,
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm/kvm/hyp/switch.c
index 92678b7bd046..624a510d31df 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/hyp/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/hyp/switch.c
@@ -48,7 +48,9 @@ static void __hyp_text __activate_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *fpexc_host)
 	write_sysreg(HSTR_T(15), HSTR);
 	write_sysreg(HCPTR_TTA | HCPTR_TCP(10) | HCPTR_TCP(11), HCPTR);
 	val = read_sysreg(HDCR);
-	write_sysreg(val | HDCR_TPM | HDCR_TPMCR, HDCR);
+	val |= HDCR_TPM | HDCR_TPMCR; /* trap performance monitors */
+	val |= HDCR_TDRA | HDCR_TDOSA | HDCR_TDA; /* trap debug regs */
+	write_sysreg(val, HDCR);
 }
 
 static void __hyp_text __deactivate_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-- 
2.11.0

Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] KVM: arm: plug guest debug exploit

[Marc Zyngier]

Hi Alex,

On 10/05/17 18:01, Alex Bennée wrote:
> From: Zhichao Huang <zhichao.huang@linaro.org>
> 
> Hardware debugging in guests is not intercepted currently, it means
> that a malicious guest can bring down the entire machine by writing
> to the debug registers.
> 
> This patch enable trapping of all debug registers, preventing the
> guests to access the debug registers. This includes access to the
> debug mode(DBGDSCR) in the guest world all the time which could
> otherwise mess with the host state. Reads return 0 and writes are
> ignored.
> 
> The result is the guest cannot detect any working hardware based debug
> support. As debug exceptions are still routed to the guest normal
> debug using software based breakpoints still works.
> 
> To support debugging using hardware registers we need to implement a
> debug register aware world switch as well as special trapping for
> registers that may affect the host state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhichao Huang <zhichao.huang@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> 
> ---
> ajb:
>   - convert to C world switch
>   - reword commit message
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h |  3 +-
>  arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c             | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c        |  4 +-
>  arch/arm/kvm/hyp/switch.c         |  4 +-
>  4 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h
> index 4917c2f7e459..e74ab0fbab79 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h
> @@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ void kvm_register_target_coproc_table(struct kvm_coproc_target_table *table);
>  int kvm_handle_cp10_id(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
>  int kvm_handle_cp_0_13_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
>  int kvm_handle_cp14_load_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
> -int kvm_handle_cp14_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
> +int kvm_handle_cp14_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
> +int kvm_handle_cp14_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
>  int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
>  int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
> index 3e5e4194ef86..b2053393bb1f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
> @@ -93,12 +93,6 @@ int kvm_handle_cp14_load_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> -int kvm_handle_cp14_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> -{
> -	kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
> -	return 1;
> -}
> -
>  static void reset_mpidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct coproc_reg *r)
>  {
>  	/*
> @@ -514,12 +508,8 @@ static int emulate_cp15(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> -/**
> - * kvm_handle_cp15_64 -- handles a mrrc/mcrr trap on a guest CP15 access
> - * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
> - * @run:  The kvm_run struct
> - */
> -int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> +static int kvm_handle_cp_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
> +			    bool cp15)
>  {
>  	struct coproc_params params;
>  
> @@ -533,7 +523,35 @@ int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  	params.Rt2 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 10) & 0xf;
>  	params.CRm = 0;
>  
> -	return emulate_cp15(vcpu, &params);
> +	if (cp15)
> +		return emulate_cp15(vcpu, &params);
> +
> +	/* raz_wi cp14 */
> +	(void)pm_fake(vcpu, &params, NULL);

Why this (void) cast?

> +
> +	/* handled */
> +	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * kvm_handle_cp15_64 -- handles a mrrc/mcrr trap on a guest CP15 access
> + * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
> + * @run:  The kvm_run struct
> + */
> +int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> +{
> +	return kvm_handle_cp_64(vcpu, run, 1);

true instead of 1?

> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * kvm_handle_cp14_64 -- handles a mrrc/mcrr trap on a guest CP14 access
> + * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
> + * @run:  The kvm_run struct
> + */
> +int kvm_handle_cp14_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> +{
> +	return kvm_handle_cp_64(vcpu, run, 0);

false?

>  }
>  
>  static void reset_coproc_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> @@ -546,12 +564,8 @@ static void reset_coproc_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			table[i].reset(vcpu, &table[i]);
>  }
>  
> -/**
> - * kvm_handle_cp15_32 -- handles a mrc/mcr trap on a guest CP15 access
> - * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
> - * @run:  The kvm_run struct
> - */
> -int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> +static int kvm_handle_cp_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
> +			      bool cp15)
>  {
>  	struct coproc_params params;
>  
> @@ -565,7 +579,35 @@ int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  	params.Op2 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 17) & 0x7;
>  	params.Rt2 = 0;
>  
> -	return emulate_cp15(vcpu, &params);
> +	if (cp15)
> +		return emulate_cp15(vcpu, &params);
> +
> +	/* raz_wi cp14 */
> +	(void)pm_fake(vcpu, &params, NULL);
> +
> +	/* handled */
> +	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * kvm_handle_cp15_32 -- handles a mrc/mcr trap on a guest CP15 access
> + * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
> + * @run:  The kvm_run struct
> + */
> +int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> +{
> +	return kvm_handle_cp_32(vcpu, run, 1);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * kvm_handle_cp14_32 -- handles a mrc/mcr trap on a guest CP14 access
> + * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
> + * @run:  The kvm_run struct
> + */
> +int kvm_handle_cp14_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> +{
> +	return kvm_handle_cp_32(vcpu, run, 0);
>  }
>  
>  /******************************************************************************
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
> index 96af65a30d78..42f5daf715d0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
> @@ -95,9 +95,9 @@ static exit_handle_fn arm_exit_handlers[] = {
>  	[HSR_EC_WFI]		= kvm_handle_wfx,
>  	[HSR_EC_CP15_32]	= kvm_handle_cp15_32,
>  	[HSR_EC_CP15_64]	= kvm_handle_cp15_64,
> -	[HSR_EC_CP14_MR]	= kvm_handle_cp14_access,
> +	[HSR_EC_CP14_MR]	= kvm_handle_cp14_32,
>  	[HSR_EC_CP14_LS]	= kvm_handle_cp14_load_store,
> -	[HSR_EC_CP14_64]	= kvm_handle_cp14_access,
> +	[HSR_EC_CP14_64]	= kvm_handle_cp14_64,

It feels a bit odd to have separate methods at this level, converging
onto a single one that has to apply separate treatments in
kvm_handle_cp_{32,64} depending on the CP number. I wonder if it
wouldn't be nicer to either keep the paths separate entirely, or have a
single access method that does it all.

>  	[HSR_EC_CP_0_13]	= kvm_handle_cp_0_13_access,
>  	[HSR_EC_CP10_ID]	= kvm_handle_cp10_id,
>  	[HSR_EC_HVC]		= handle_hvc,
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> index 92678b7bd046..624a510d31df 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> @@ -48,7 +48,9 @@ static void __hyp_text __activate_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *fpexc_host)
>  	write_sysreg(HSTR_T(15), HSTR);
>  	write_sysreg(HCPTR_TTA | HCPTR_TCP(10) | HCPTR_TCP(11), HCPTR);
>  	val = read_sysreg(HDCR);
> -	write_sysreg(val | HDCR_TPM | HDCR_TPMCR, HDCR);
> +	val |= HDCR_TPM | HDCR_TPMCR; /* trap performance monitors */
> +	val |= HDCR_TDRA | HDCR_TDOSA | HDCR_TDA; /* trap debug regs */
> +	write_sysreg(val, HDCR);
>  }
>  
>  static void __hyp_text __deactivate_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> 

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] KVM: arm: plug guest debug exploit

[Alex Bennée]

Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> writes:

> Hi Alex,
>
> On 10/05/17 18:01, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> From: Zhichao Huang <zhichao.huang@linaro.org>
>>
>> Hardware debugging in guests is not intercepted currently, it means
>> that a malicious guest can bring down the entire machine by writing
>> to the debug registers.
>>
>> This patch enable trapping of all debug registers, preventing the
>> guests to access the debug registers. This includes access to the
>> debug mode(DBGDSCR) in the guest world all the time which could
>> otherwise mess with the host state. Reads return 0 and writes are
>> ignored.
>>
>> The result is the guest cannot detect any working hardware based debug
>> support. As debug exceptions are still routed to the guest normal
>> debug using software based breakpoints still works.
>>
>> To support debugging using hardware registers we need to implement a
>> debug register aware world switch as well as special trapping for
>> registers that may affect the host state.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhichao Huang <zhichao.huang@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>>
>> ---
>> ajb:
>>   - convert to C world switch
>>   - reword commit message
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h |  3 +-
>>  arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c             | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>  arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c        |  4 +-
>>  arch/arm/kvm/hyp/switch.c         |  4 +-
>>  4 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h
>> index 4917c2f7e459..e74ab0fbab79 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h
>> @@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ void kvm_register_target_coproc_table(struct kvm_coproc_target_table *table);
>>  int kvm_handle_cp10_id(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
>>  int kvm_handle_cp_0_13_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
>>  int kvm_handle_cp14_load_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
>> -int kvm_handle_cp14_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
>> +int kvm_handle_cp14_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
>> +int kvm_handle_cp14_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
>>  int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
>>  int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
>> index 3e5e4194ef86..b2053393bb1f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
>> @@ -93,12 +93,6 @@ int kvm_handle_cp14_load_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>>  	return 1;
>>  }
>>
>> -int kvm_handle_cp14_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>> -{
>> -	kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
>> -	return 1;
>> -}
>> -
>>  static void reset_mpidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct coproc_reg *r)
>>  {
>>  	/*
>> @@ -514,12 +508,8 @@ static int emulate_cp15(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>  	return 1;
>>  }
>>
>> -/**
>> - * kvm_handle_cp15_64 -- handles a mrrc/mcrr trap on a guest CP15 access
>> - * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
>> - * @run:  The kvm_run struct
>> - */
>> -int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>> +static int kvm_handle_cp_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
>> +			    bool cp15)
>>  {
>>  	struct coproc_params params;
>>
>> @@ -533,7 +523,35 @@ int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>>  	params.Rt2 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 10) & 0xf;
>>  	params.CRm = 0;
>>
>> -	return emulate_cp15(vcpu, &params);
>> +	if (cp15)
>> +		return emulate_cp15(vcpu, &params);
>> +
>> +	/* raz_wi cp14 */
>> +	(void)pm_fake(vcpu, &params, NULL);
>
> Why this (void) cast?

I guess a super picky compiler could complain about throwing away a
return value? Mine didn't do I've removed it.

>
>> +
>> +	/* handled */
>> +	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
>> +	return 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * kvm_handle_cp15_64 -- handles a mrrc/mcrr trap on a guest CP15 access
>> + * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
>> + * @run:  The kvm_run struct
>> + */
>> +int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>> +{
>> +	return kvm_handle_cp_64(vcpu, run, 1);
>
> true instead of 1?

fixed

>
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * kvm_handle_cp14_64 -- handles a mrrc/mcrr trap on a guest CP14 access
>> + * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
>> + * @run:  The kvm_run struct
>> + */
>> +int kvm_handle_cp14_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>> +{
>> +	return kvm_handle_cp_64(vcpu, run, 0);
>
> false?

fixed

>
>>  }
>>
>>  static void reset_coproc_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> @@ -546,12 +564,8 @@ static void reset_coproc_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>  			table[i].reset(vcpu, &table[i]);
>>  }
>>
>> -/**
>> - * kvm_handle_cp15_32 -- handles a mrc/mcr trap on a guest CP15 access
>> - * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
>> - * @run:  The kvm_run struct
>> - */
>> -int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>> +static int kvm_handle_cp_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
>> +			      bool cp15)
>>  {
>>  	struct coproc_params params;
>>
>> @@ -565,7 +579,35 @@ int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>>  	params.Op2 = (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) >> 17) & 0x7;
>>  	params.Rt2 = 0;
>>
>> -	return emulate_cp15(vcpu, &params);
>> +	if (cp15)
>> +		return emulate_cp15(vcpu, &params);
>> +
>> +	/* raz_wi cp14 */
>> +	(void)pm_fake(vcpu, &params, NULL);
>> +
>> +	/* handled */
>> +	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
>> +	return 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * kvm_handle_cp15_32 -- handles a mrc/mcr trap on a guest CP15 access
>> + * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
>> + * @run:  The kvm_run struct
>> + */
>> +int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>> +{
>> +	return kvm_handle_cp_32(vcpu, run, 1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * kvm_handle_cp14_32 -- handles a mrc/mcr trap on a guest CP14 access
>> + * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
>> + * @run:  The kvm_run struct
>> + */
>> +int kvm_handle_cp14_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>> +{
>> +	return kvm_handle_cp_32(vcpu, run, 0);
>>  }
>>
>>  /******************************************************************************
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
>> index 96af65a30d78..42f5daf715d0 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
>> @@ -95,9 +95,9 @@ static exit_handle_fn arm_exit_handlers[] = {
>>  	[HSR_EC_WFI]		= kvm_handle_wfx,
>>  	[HSR_EC_CP15_32]	= kvm_handle_cp15_32,
>>  	[HSR_EC_CP15_64]	= kvm_handle_cp15_64,
>> -	[HSR_EC_CP14_MR]	= kvm_handle_cp14_access,
>> +	[HSR_EC_CP14_MR]	= kvm_handle_cp14_32,
>>  	[HSR_EC_CP14_LS]	= kvm_handle_cp14_load_store,
>> -	[HSR_EC_CP14_64]	= kvm_handle_cp14_access,
>> +	[HSR_EC_CP14_64]	= kvm_handle_cp14_64,
>
> It feels a bit odd to have separate methods at this level, converging
> onto a single one that has to apply separate treatments in
> kvm_handle_cp_{32,64} depending on the CP number. I wonder if it
> wouldn't be nicer to either keep the paths separate entirely, or have a
> single access method that does it all.

I've separated the cp14 and cp15 paths with a light bit of re-factoring
to extract params.

>
>>  	[HSR_EC_CP_0_13]	= kvm_handle_cp_0_13_access,
>>  	[HSR_EC_CP10_ID]	= kvm_handle_cp10_id,
>>  	[HSR_EC_HVC]		= handle_hvc,
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm/kvm/hyp/switch.c
>> index 92678b7bd046..624a510d31df 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/hyp/switch.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/hyp/switch.c
>> @@ -48,7 +48,9 @@ static void __hyp_text __activate_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *fpexc_host)
>>  	write_sysreg(HSTR_T(15), HSTR);
>>  	write_sysreg(HCPTR_TTA | HCPTR_TCP(10) | HCPTR_TCP(11), HCPTR);
>>  	val = read_sysreg(HDCR);
>> -	write_sysreg(val | HDCR_TPM | HDCR_TPMCR, HDCR);
>> +	val |= HDCR_TPM | HDCR_TPMCR; /* trap performance monitors */
>> +	val |= HDCR_TDRA | HDCR_TDOSA | HDCR_TDA; /* trap debug regs */
>> +	write_sysreg(val, HDCR);
>>  }
>>
>>  static void __hyp_text __deactivate_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>
>
> Thanks,


Cheers, I'll send v2 soon.

--
Alex Bennée

[PATCH v1 2/2] KVM: arm: rename pm_fake handler to trap_raz_wi

[Alex Bennée]

From: Zhichao Huang <zhichao.huang@linaro.org>

pm_fake doesn't quite describe what the handler does (ignoring writes
and returning 0 for reads).

As we're about to use it (a lot) in a different context, rename it
with a (admitedly cryptic) name that make sense for all users.

Signed-off-by: Zhichao Huang <zhichao.huang@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennee <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
index b2053393bb1f..6919363ce7cc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static bool access_gic_sre(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  * must always support PMCCNTR (the cycle counter): we just RAZ/WI for
  * all PM registers, which doesn't crash the guest kernel at least.
  */
-static bool pm_fake(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+static bool trap_raz_wi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		    const struct coproc_params *p,
 		    const struct coproc_reg *r)
 {
@@ -270,19 +270,19 @@ static bool pm_fake(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		return read_zero(vcpu, p);
 }
 
-#define access_pmcr pm_fake
-#define access_pmcntenset pm_fake
-#define access_pmcntenclr pm_fake
-#define access_pmovsr pm_fake
-#define access_pmselr pm_fake
-#define access_pmceid0 pm_fake
-#define access_pmceid1 pm_fake
-#define access_pmccntr pm_fake
-#define access_pmxevtyper pm_fake
-#define access_pmxevcntr pm_fake
-#define access_pmuserenr pm_fake
-#define access_pmintenset pm_fake
-#define access_pmintenclr pm_fake
+#define access_pmcr trap_raz_wi
+#define access_pmcntenset trap_raz_wi
+#define access_pmcntenclr trap_raz_wi
+#define access_pmovsr trap_raz_wi
+#define access_pmselr trap_raz_wi
+#define access_pmceid0 trap_raz_wi
+#define access_pmceid1 trap_raz_wi
+#define access_pmccntr trap_raz_wi
+#define access_pmxevtyper trap_raz_wi
+#define access_pmxevcntr trap_raz_wi
+#define access_pmuserenr trap_raz_wi
+#define access_pmintenset trap_raz_wi
+#define access_pmintenclr trap_raz_wi
 
 /* Architected CP15 registers.
  * CRn denotes the primary register number, but is copied to the CRm in the
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ static int kvm_handle_cp_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
 		return emulate_cp15(vcpu, &params);
 
 	/* raz_wi cp14 */
-	(void)pm_fake(vcpu, &params, NULL);
+	(void)trap_raz_wi(vcpu, &params, NULL);
 
 	/* handled */
 	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
@@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ static int kvm_handle_cp_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
 		return emulate_cp15(vcpu, &params);
 
 	/* raz_wi cp14 */
-	(void)pm_fake(vcpu, &params, NULL);
+	(void)trap_raz_wi(vcpu, &params, NULL);
 
 	/* handled */
 	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
-- 
2.11.0

Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] KVM: arm: rename pm_fake handler to trap_raz_wi

[Marc Zyngier]

On 10/05/17 18:01, Alex Bennée wrote:
> From: Zhichao Huang <zhichao.huang@linaro.org>
> 
> pm_fake doesn't quite describe what the handler does (ignoring writes
> and returning 0 for reads).
> 
> As we're about to use it (a lot) in a different context, rename it
> with a (admitedly cryptic) name that make sense for all users.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhichao Huang <zhichao.huang@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Bennee <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...