From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>, x86@kernel.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, adobriyan@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86/alternative: simplify DUMP_BYTES macro
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 18:36:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v8vn1o7u.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220311144312.88466-1-adobriyan@gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 11 2022 at 17:43, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> Avoid zero length check with clever whitespace placement in the format
> string.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan (CloudLinux) <adobriyan@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 21 +++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> index 5007c3ffe96f..6c9758ee6810 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> @@ -66,13 +66,10 @@ do { \
> if (unlikely(debug_alternative)) { \
> int j; \
> \
> - if (!(len)) \
> - break; \
> - \
How does that clever whitespace placement prevent this being printed in
the len == 0 case, which is a legit case?
> printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##args); \
This is debug muck. So why does it have to be "optimized"?
Thanks,
tglx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-05 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-11 14:43 Alexey Dobriyan
2022-03-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86/alternative: bump MAX_PATCH_LEN Alexey Dobriyan
2022-03-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86/alternative: record .altinstructions section entity size Alexey Dobriyan
2022-03-12 21:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-13 18:05 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2022-04-05 19:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-06 8:30 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-03-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86/alternative: make .altinstr_replacement section non-executable Alexey Dobriyan
2022-03-12 15:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86/unwind/orc: delete dead write in __orc_find() Alexey Dobriyan
2022-03-11 15:13 ` David Laight
2022-03-11 16:59 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2022-03-12 16:36 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86/alternative: simplify DUMP_BYTES macro Joe Perches
2022-03-13 0:14 ` Joe Perches
2022-03-13 18:09 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2022-03-14 3:21 ` Joe Perches
2022-04-03 22:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-05 16:36 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v8vn1o7u.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®