From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86/unwind/orc: delete dead write in __orc_find()
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 19:59:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yit/1Ba5IIHl8eKt@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6257b01104da4891af46eec530df1dcb@AcuMS.aculab.com>
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 03:13:02PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Alexey Dobriyan
> > Sent: 11 March 2022 14:43
> >
> > Also move "mid" variable to the innermost scope and delete useless
> > parenthesis while I'm at it.
>
> Hiding the definition of 'mid' in the inner scope is pointless.
Not, it is not.
> I'm also not 100% sure that 'found' is always set.
"found" is left as-is by the patch.
> Consider the ip < orc_ip(first) case.
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
> > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static struct orc_entry *__orc_find(int *ip_table, struct orc_entry *u_table,
> > {
> > int *first = ip_table;
> > int *last = ip_table + num_entries - 1;
> > - int *mid = first, *found = first;
> > + int *found = first;
> >
> > if (!num_entries)
> > return NULL;
> > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static struct orc_entry *__orc_find(int *ip_table, struct orc_entry *u_table,
> > * ignored when they conflict with a real entry.
> > */
> > while (first <= last) {
> > - mid = first + ((last - first) / 2);
> > + int *mid = first + (last - first) / 2;
> >
> > if (orc_ip(mid) <= ip) {
> > found = mid;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-11 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-11 14:43 [PATCH 1/5] x86/alternative: simplify DUMP_BYTES macro Alexey Dobriyan
2022-03-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86/alternative: bump MAX_PATCH_LEN Alexey Dobriyan
2022-03-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86/alternative: record .altinstructions section entity size Alexey Dobriyan
2022-03-12 21:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-13 18:05 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2022-04-05 19:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-06 8:30 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-03-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86/alternative: make .altinstr_replacement section non-executable Alexey Dobriyan
2022-03-12 15:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86/unwind/orc: delete dead write in __orc_find() Alexey Dobriyan
2022-03-11 15:13 ` David Laight
2022-03-11 16:59 ` Alexey Dobriyan [this message]
2022-03-12 16:36 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86/alternative: simplify DUMP_BYTES macro Joe Perches
2022-03-13 0:14 ` Joe Perches
2022-03-13 18:09 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2022-03-14 3:21 ` Joe Perches
2022-04-03 22:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-05 16:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yit/1Ba5IIHl8eKt@localhost.localdomain \
--to=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®