From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] block: assign caller-specific lockdep class to disk->open_mutex
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 15:09:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y0gaekyb.fsf@t14s.mail-host-address-is-not-set> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d405942-9932-48b0-bdc0-9744d48fe699@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
"Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> writes:
> On 2026/06/19 18:49, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>>> My understanding is that we don't have infrastructure for lock class keys
>>> that can be applied to
>>>
>>> +struct gendisk_lkclass {
>>> + struct lock_class_key bio_lkclass;
>>> + struct lock_class_key open_mutex_lkclass;
>>> +};
>>>
>>> - static struct lock_class_key __key;
>>> + static struct gendisk_lkclass __key;
>>>
>>> change. Alternative approach is welcomed if you have one.
>>
>> Sorry, I did not pay enough attention. I would suggest this approach:
>
> I'm OK with your module-specific lockdep class approach
>
>> @@ -164,14 +127,21 @@ pub fn build<T: Operations>(
>> lim.features = bindings::BLK_FEAT_ROTATIONAL;
>> }
>>
>> - // SAFETY: `tagset.raw_tag_set()` points to a valid and initialized tag set
>> + let keys = KBox::pin_init(
>> + Opaque::ffi_init(|ptr: *mut bindings::gendisk_lkclass| {
>> + // SAFETY: `ptr` is valid for writes
>> + unsafe { bindings::lockdep_register_key(&raw mut (*ptr).bio_lkclass) };
>> + // SAFETY: `ptr` is valid for writes
>> + unsafe { bindings::lockdep_register_key(&raw mut (*ptr).open_mutex_lkclass) };
>> + }),
>> + GFP_KERNEL,
>> + )?;
>> +
>> + // SAFETY:
>> + // - `tagset.raw_tag_set()` points to a valid and initialized tag set.
>> + // - We keep `keys` alive for the lifetime of the returned gendisk.
>> let gendisk = from_err_ptr(unsafe {
>> - bindings::__blk_mq_alloc_disk(
>> - tagset.raw_tag_set(),
>> - &mut lim,
>> - data,
>> - lkclass.as_ptr(),
>> - )
>> + bindings::__blk_mq_alloc_disk(tagset.raw_tag_set(), &mut lim, data, keys.get())
>> })?;
>>
>> const TABLE: bindings::block_device_operations = bindings::block_device_operations {
>
> if we can assume that there is (up to) only one
>
> let mut disk = gen_disk::GenDiskBuilder::new().capacity_sectors(4096).build(fmt!("myblk"), tagset, ())?;
>
> call for each rust module.
With the approach I suggest here, we get a new set of keys for each
invocation of `GenDiskBuilder::build`. No statics involved, keys are
allocated dynamically.
The current code makes one key for to be shared by _all_ callers, which
is probably a bad idea.
>
> By the way, are you aware that rust-enabled linux-next build is recently failing
> ( https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=1f14a35d0c73d31555e4 ) ?
I was not aware, thanks for pointing that out. I actually did build
linux-next for both June 16 and June 18 and I did not see any issue. It
looks like a tooling problem to me. I'll see if I can figure out what it
is.
Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-19 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-30 13:45 [PATCH] " Tetsuo Handa
2026-05-30 21:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-06-01 7:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-03 6:25 ` [PATCH v2] " Tetsuo Handa
2026-06-03 11:54 ` [PATCH v3] " Tetsuo Handa
2026-06-04 21:07 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-06-05 7:36 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-06-05 10:08 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-06-05 11:02 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-06-05 12:04 ` Mark Brown
2026-06-05 12:40 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-06-05 13:03 ` Mark Brown
2026-06-05 15:04 ` Mark Brown
2026-06-05 7:54 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-06-05 10:14 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-06-19 9:49 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-06-19 12:19 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-06-19 13:09 ` Andreas Hindborg [this message]
2026-06-19 13:16 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-05-30 22:50 ` [PATCH] " Hillf Danton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y0gaekyb.fsf@t14s.mail-host-address-is-not-set \
--to=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®