mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>, julia.lawall@lip6.fr
Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com, Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@example.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	"open list\:LOCKING PRIMITIVES" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] locking/rtmutex: Remove Comparison to bool
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:28:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y2rkwwf5.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200327212358.5752-2-jbi.octave@gmail.com>

Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com> writes:

> From: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@example.com>
>
> Coccinelle reports a warning inside rt_mutex_slowunlock()
>
> WARNING: Comparison to bool
>
> To fix this, the comparison to bool is removed
> This not only fixes the issue but also removes the unnecessary comparison.
>
> Remove comparison to bool

So you explain 3 times in different ways that the comparison to bool is
removed. What's the point?

Thanks,

        tglx



  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-28 11:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <0/10>
     [not found] ` <20200327212358.5752-1-jbi.octave@gmail.com>
2020-03-27 21:23   ` Jules Irenge
2020-03-28 11:28     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-03-28 12:02       ` Jules Irenge
2020-03-28 12:44         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-27 21:23   ` [PATCH 02/10] sched/topology: Replace 1 and 0 by boolean value Jules Irenge
2020-03-30 11:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03 16:23       ` Jules Irenge
2020-03-27 21:23   ` [PATCH 03/10] cpu: Remove Comparison to bool Jules Irenge
2020-03-28 11:29     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-27 21:23   ` [PATCH 04/10] irq: Replace 1 by true Jules Irenge
2020-03-27 21:23   ` [PATCH 05/10] softirq: Replace BUG() after if statement with BUG_ON Jules Irenge
2020-03-28 11:22     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-27 21:23   ` [PATCH 06/10] rcu: Replace assigned pointer ret value by corresponding boolean value Jules Irenge
2020-03-30 21:12     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-03-27 21:23   ` [PATCH 07/10] sched/fair: Replace 1 and 0 by " Jules Irenge
2020-03-30 11:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-27 21:23   ` [PATCH 08/10] trace: Replace printk and WARN_ON with WARN Jules Irenge
2020-03-27 21:23   ` [PATCH 09/10] kernel/sysctl.c: Replace 1 and 0 by corresponding boolean value Jules Irenge
2020-03-28 21:24     ` Kees Cook
2020-03-27 21:23   ` [PATCH 10/10] trace: Replace printk and WARN_ON with WARN Jules Irenge
2020-03-27 22:51     ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-28 12:00       ` Jules Irenge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y2rkwwf5.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=jbi.octave@example.com \
    --cc=jbi.octave@gmail.com \
    --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome