Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Fix typo in comment

["zhenglifeng (A)" <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>]

On 5/21/2026 7:39 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Replace "diver" with "driver" in the comment describing
> CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 2ab691828e48..4d4b4ed24b30 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
>  /*
>   * Set by drivers that need to update internal upper and lower boundaries along
>   * with the target frequency and so the core and governors should also invoke
> - * the diver if the target frequency does not change, but the policy min or max
> + * the driver if the target frequency does not change, but the policy min or max
>   * may have changed.
>   */
>  #define CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS		BIT(0)

For all three patches:

Reviewed-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>

Thanks for always doing things so fast.