Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Fix typo in comment

[Zhongqiu Han <zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 5/21/2026 7:39 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Replace "diver" with "driver" in the comment describing
> CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>


Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Zhongqiu Han <zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com>


> ---
>   include/linux/cpufreq.h | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 2ab691828e48..4d4b4ed24b30 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
>   /*
>    * Set by drivers that need to update internal upper and lower boundaries along
>    * with the target frequency and so the core and governors should also invoke
> - * the diver if the target frequency does not change, but the policy min or max
> + * the driver if the target frequency does not change, but the policy min or max
>    * may have changed.
>    */
>   #define CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS		BIT(0)


-- 
Thx and BRs,
Zhongqiu Han