mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] f2fs: Prevent s_writer rw_sem count mismatch in f2fs_evict_inode
       [not found] <CGME20240322041642epcas1p45a26c5b2bde5f8b006c900c235b14e01@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
@ 2024-03-22  4:16 ` Yeongjin Gil
  2024-03-23  2:11   ` Chao Yu
  2024-04-14 15:32   ` [f2fs-dev] " patchwork-bot+f2fs
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yeongjin Gil @ 2024-03-22  4:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jaegeuk, chao
  Cc: linux-f2fs-devel, linux-kernel, Yeongjin Gil, Sungjong Seo, Sunmin Jeong

If f2fs_evict_inode is called between freeze_super and thaw_super, the
s_writer rwsem count may become negative, resulting in hang.

CPU1                       CPU2

f2fs_resize_fs()           f2fs_evict_inode()
  f2fs_freeze
    set SBI_IS_FREEZING
                             skip sb_start_intwrite
  f2fs_unfreeze
    clear SBI_IS_FREEZING
                             sb_end_intwrite

To solve this problem, the call to sb_end_write is determined by whether
sb_start_intwrite is called, rather than the current freezing status.

Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Sunmin Jeong <s_min.jeong@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Yeongjin Gil <youngjin.gil@samsung.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/inode.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
index c26effdce9aa..12b1fef31f43 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
@@ -804,6 +804,7 @@ void f2fs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
 	struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = F2FS_I(inode);
 	nid_t xnid = fi->i_xattr_nid;
 	int err = 0;
+	bool freeze_protected = false;
 
 	f2fs_abort_atomic_write(inode, true);
 
@@ -843,8 +844,10 @@ void f2fs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
 	f2fs_remove_ino_entry(sbi, inode->i_ino, UPDATE_INO);
 	f2fs_remove_ino_entry(sbi, inode->i_ino, FLUSH_INO);
 
-	if (!is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_FREEZING))
+	if (!is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_FREEZING)) {
 		sb_start_intwrite(inode->i_sb);
+		freeze_protected = true;
+	}
 	set_inode_flag(inode, FI_NO_ALLOC);
 	i_size_write(inode, 0);
 retry:
@@ -887,7 +890,7 @@ void f2fs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
 		if (dquot_initialize_needed(inode))
 			set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_QUOTA_NEED_REPAIR);
 	}
-	if (!is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_FREEZING))
+	if (freeze_protected)
 		sb_end_intwrite(inode->i_sb);
 no_delete:
 	dquot_drop(inode);
-- 
2.40.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] f2fs: Prevent s_writer rw_sem count mismatch in f2fs_evict_inode
  2024-03-22  4:16 ` [PATCH] f2fs: Prevent s_writer rw_sem count mismatch in f2fs_evict_inode Yeongjin Gil
@ 2024-03-23  2:11   ` Chao Yu
  2024-04-14 15:32   ` [f2fs-dev] " patchwork-bot+f2fs
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2024-03-23  2:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yeongjin Gil, jaegeuk
  Cc: linux-f2fs-devel, linux-kernel, Sungjong Seo, Sunmin Jeong

On 2024/3/22 12:16, Yeongjin Gil wrote:
> If f2fs_evict_inode is called between freeze_super and thaw_super, the
> s_writer rwsem count may become negative, resulting in hang.
> 
> CPU1 CPU2
> 
> f2fs_resize_fs()           f2fs_evict_inode()
>    f2fs_freeze
>      set SBI_IS_FREEZING
>                               skip sb_start_intwrite
>    f2fs_unfreeze
>      clear SBI_IS_FREEZING
>                               sb_end_intwrite
> 
> To solve this problem, the call to sb_end_write is determined by whether
> sb_start_intwrite is called, rather than the current freezing status.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sunmin Jeong <s_min.jeong@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yeongjin Gil <youngjin.gil@samsung.com>

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>

Thanks,

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: Prevent s_writer rw_sem count mismatch in f2fs_evict_inode
  2024-03-22  4:16 ` [PATCH] f2fs: Prevent s_writer rw_sem count mismatch in f2fs_evict_inode Yeongjin Gil
  2024-03-23  2:11   ` Chao Yu
@ 2024-04-14 15:32   ` patchwork-bot+f2fs
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+f2fs @ 2024-04-14 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yeongjin Gil; +Cc: jaegeuk, chao, sj1557.seo, linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel

Hello:

This patch was applied to jaegeuk/f2fs.git (dev)
by Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>:

On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 13:16:39 +0900 you wrote:
> If f2fs_evict_inode is called between freeze_super and thaw_super, the
> s_writer rwsem count may become negative, resulting in hang.
> 
> CPU1                       CPU2
> 
> f2fs_resize_fs()           f2fs_evict_inode()
>   f2fs_freeze
>     set SBI_IS_FREEZING
>                              skip sb_start_intwrite
>   f2fs_unfreeze
>     clear SBI_IS_FREEZING
>                              sb_end_intwrite
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [f2fs-dev] f2fs: Prevent s_writer rw_sem count mismatch in f2fs_evict_inode
    https://git.kernel.org/jaegeuk/f2fs/c/3127f1010c9b

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-14 15:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <CGME20240322041642epcas1p45a26c5b2bde5f8b006c900c235b14e01@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2024-03-22  4:16 ` [PATCH] f2fs: Prevent s_writer rw_sem count mismatch in f2fs_evict_inode Yeongjin Gil
2024-03-23  2:11   ` Chao Yu
2024-04-14 15:32   ` [f2fs-dev] " patchwork-bot+f2fs

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®