From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: martin.nvme.dev@gmail.com,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>, Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>,
kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 3/5] tls: update the RX key when a KeyUpdate is received
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 08:53:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8af172e4-0039-4dbb-970e-ab91b3d6e149@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261025-keyupdate-rfc-v1-3-60b7756eccbd@gmail.com>
On 10/26/26 1:36 AM, Martin Belanger via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com>
>
> When a KeyUpdate arrives, kTLS blocks reads with -EKEYEXPIRED until
> the user installs the next key. A kernel user such as nvme-tcp or
> sunrpc never does, so the connection stalls.
>
> For a socket with a registered RX secret, derive the next key and
> install it when the KeyUpdate is decrypted. The record is not passed to
> the user, so recvmsg(), splice() and read_sock() go on to the next
> record. Without a registered secret the behavior is unchanged.
>
> A KeyUpdate that is not alone in its record, has a wrong length or an
> invalid request_update value ends the connection, as RFC 9846 section
> 4.7.3 requires. So does a peer that sends more than 8 KeyUpdates in one
> second, the same limit as GnuTLS.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com>
> ---
> include/net/tls.h | 7 +++
> net/tls/Makefile | 3 +-
> net/tls/tls.h | 2 +
> net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> net/tls/tls_sw.c | 35 +++++++++--
> 5 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/tls.h b/include/net/tls.h
> index aacc6d12226e..a5bc28a7d1f5 100644
> --- a/include/net/tls.h
> +++ b/include/net/tls.h
> @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ struct tls_rec;
>
> #define TLS_HANDSHAKE_KEYUPDATE 24 /* rfc8446 B.3: Key update */
>
> +/* KeyUpdate: msg_type, 24-bit length, request_update (RFC 9846 4.7.3) */
> +#define TLS_KEYUPDATE_MSG_SIZE 5
> +#define TLS_KEY_UPDATE_NOT_REQUESTED 0
> +#define TLS_KEY_UPDATE_REQUESTED 1
> +
> #define TLS_AAD_SPACE_SIZE 13
>
> /* SHA-384, the longest hash of a TLS 1.3 cipher suite kTLS supports */
> @@ -142,6 +147,8 @@ struct tls_sw_context_rx {
> u8 zc_capable:1;
> u8 reader_contended:1;
> bool key_update_pending;
> + u8 key_update_count; /* received in this window */
> + unsigned long key_update_window; /* jiffies */
>
> struct tls_strparser strp;
>
> diff --git a/net/tls/Makefile b/net/tls/Makefile
> index 6edcf1271b75..ce8ac6a59f8c 100644
> --- a/net/tls/Makefile
> +++ b/net/tls/Makefile
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ CFLAGS_trace.o := -I$(src)
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_TLS) += tls.o
>
> -tls-y := tls_main.o tls_sw.o tls_proc.o trace.o tls_strp.o tls_hkdf.o
> +tls-y := tls_main.o tls_sw.o tls_proc.o trace.o tls_strp.o tls_hkdf.o \
> + tls_keyupdate.o
>
> tls-$(CONFIG_TLS_DEVICE) += tls_device.o tls_device_fallback.o
> diff --git a/net/tls/tls.h b/net/tls/tls.h
> index b2061f6bf065..63ece8074985 100644
> --- a/net/tls/tls.h
> +++ b/net/tls/tls.h
> @@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ int init_prot_info(struct tls_prot_info *prot,
> const struct tls_cipher_desc *cipher_desc);
> int tls_hkdf_expand_label(const u8 *secret, size_t secret_len,
> const char *label, u8 *out, size_t out_len);
> +int tls_keyupdate_rekey(struct sock *sk, int tx);
> +int tls_keyupdate_rx(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
> int tls_set_sw_offload(struct sock *sk, int tx,
> struct tls_crypto_info *new_crypto_info);
> void tls_update_rx_zc_capable(struct tls_context *tls_ctx);
> diff --git a/net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c b/net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..543bf57599c7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/* Copyright (c) 2026 Dell Technologies Inc. or its subsidiaries.
> + *
> + * TLS 1.3 KeyUpdate, RFC 9846 sections 4.7.3 and 7.2.
> + *
> + * A TLS 1.3 peer can change the key of the direction it sends in at any
> + * time. It sends a KeyUpdate message, then encrypts all later records
> + * with the next key. A sender must also change its key before the key
> + * has protected too many records (section 5.5).
> + *
> + * The next key is derived from the application traffic secret, not from
> + * the current key. User space gives the kernel only the key and IV, so
> + * the kernel cannot derive the next key on its own. Without the secret,
> + * a received KeyUpdate goes to the application, and the kernel stops
> + * decrypting until the application installs the next key with TLS_RX.
> + *
> + * With TLS_TX_TRAFFIC_SECRET or TLS_RX_TRAFFIC_SECRET, user space also
> + * gives the kernel the secret of that direction. The kernel then handles
> + * KeyUpdate itself. This file derives and installs the next key, and
> + * processes a received KeyUpdate. tls_sw.c sends KeyUpdate messages.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
> +#include <linux/skbuff.h>
> +#include <net/strparser.h>
> +#include <net/tls.h>
> +
> +#include "tls.h"
> +
> +/* A peer that sends more KeyUpdates than this in one second ends the
> + * connection. Each one costs three HMACs and a new key, and carries no
> + * data.
> + */
> +#define TLS_KEYUPDATE_RX_MAX_PER_SEC 8
> +
> +/**
> + * tls_keyupdate_rekey - install the next key of one direction
> + * @sk: socket
> + * @tx: non-zero for the transmit direction
> + *
> + * Derive the next application traffic secret from the registered one,
> + * then its key and IV, and install them. The record sequence number
> + * restarts at zero.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, or a negative errno. On error the installed key
> + * and the registered secret do not change.
> + */
> +int tls_keyupdate_rekey(struct sock *sk, int tx)
> +{
> + struct tls_context *ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
> + struct tls_traffic_secret *secret;
> + const struct tls_cipher_desc *cipher_desc;
> + u8 iv[TLS_MAX_SALT_SIZE + TLS_MAX_IV_SIZE];
> + u8 next[TLS_MAX_TRAFFIC_SECRET_SIZE];
> + union tls_crypto_context tmp = {};
> + struct tls_crypto_info *info = &tmp.info;
> + int rc;
> +
> + secret = tx ? &ctx->tx_secret : &ctx->rx_secret;
> + cipher_desc = get_cipher_desc(ctx->prot_info.cipher_type);
> + if (!cipher_desc || !secret->len ||
> + cipher_desc->salt + cipher_desc->iv > sizeof(iv))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* version and cipher_type; the rest of tmp stays zero */
> + *info = tx ? ctx->crypto_send.info : ctx->crypto_recv.info;
> +
> + rc = tls_hkdf_expand_label(secret->data, secret->len, "traffic upd",
> + next, secret->len);
> + if (rc)
> + goto out;
> +
> + rc = tls_hkdf_expand_label(next, secret->len, "key",
> + crypto_info_key(info, cipher_desc),
> + cipher_desc->key);
> + if (rc)
> + goto out;
> +
> + rc = tls_hkdf_expand_label(next, secret->len, "iv", iv,
> + cipher_desc->salt + cipher_desc->iv);
> + if (rc)
> + goto out;
> +
> + memcpy(crypto_info_salt(info, cipher_desc), iv, cipher_desc->salt);
> + memcpy(crypto_info_iv(info, cipher_desc), iv + cipher_desc->salt,
> + cipher_desc->iv);
> +
> + rc = tls_set_sw_offload(sk, tx, info);
> + if (rc)
> + goto out;
> +
> + memcpy(secret->data, next, secret->len);
> +
> +out:
> + memzero_explicit(next, sizeof(next));
> + memzero_explicit(iv, sizeof(iv));
> + memzero_explicit(&tmp, sizeof(tmp));
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
Hmm. So this calculates 'iv' and 'key' from the traffic secret.
But as it does, why can't we use it to calculate the _initial_ 'iv' and
'key' from the traffic secret?
IE wouldn't it make sense to allow for _just_ the (initial) traffic
secrets to be set, and calculate 'iv' and 'key' on the fly _always?
That would remove the possible admin error where the admin sets a
set of 'IV' and 'key' values which do _not_ match the traffic secrets.
Hmm?
> +/**
> + * tls_keyupdate_rx - process a received KeyUpdate
> + * @sk: socket
> + * @skb: the decrypted record, which starts with a KeyUpdate message
> + *
> + * Called with the socket locked, for a direction with a registered
> + * secret. The caller does not pass the record to the user.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, or a negative errno if the connection must end.
> + */
> +int tls_keyupdate_rx(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct tls_context *ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
> + struct tls_sw_context_rx *rx_ctx = tls_sw_ctx_rx(ctx);
> + const struct strp_msg *rxm = strp_msg(skb);
> + u8 msg[TLS_KEYUPDATE_MSG_SIZE];
> + int rc;
> +
> + /* A KeyUpdate must end its record (section 5.1). Another message
> + * in the same record is not supported.
> + */
> + if (rxm->full_len != sizeof(msg) ||
> + skb_copy_bits(skb, rxm->offset, msg, sizeof(msg)))
> + return -EBADMSG;
> +
> + /* msg_type, a 24-bit length of 1, then request_update */
> + if (msg[1] || msg[2] || msg[3] != 1)
> + return -EBADMSG;
> + if (msg[4] != TLS_KEY_UPDATE_NOT_REQUESTED &&
> + msg[4] != TLS_KEY_UPDATE_REQUESTED)
> + return -EBADMSG;
> +
> + if (!rx_ctx->key_update_count ||
> + time_after(jiffies, rx_ctx->key_update_window + HZ)) {
> + rx_ctx->key_update_window = jiffies;
> + rx_ctx->key_update_count = 0;
> + }
> + if (++rx_ctx->key_update_count > TLS_KEYUPDATE_RX_MAX_PER_SEC)
> + return -EBADMSG;
> +
> + rc = tls_keyupdate_rekey(sk, 0);
> + if (rc) {
> + TLS_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TLSRXREKEYERROR);
> + return rc;
> + }
> + TLS_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TLSRXREKEYOK);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> index 312e51270f29..a314fa638dc3 100644
> --- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> +++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> @@ -1551,15 +1551,26 @@ static int tls_check_pending_rekey(struct sock *sk, struct tls_context *ctx,
> if (hs_type == TLS_HANDSHAKE_KEYUPDATE) {
> struct tls_sw_context_rx *rx_ctx = ctx->priv_ctx_rx;
>
> - WRITE_ONCE(rx_ctx->key_update_pending, true);
> TLS_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TLSRXREKEYRECEIVED);
> +
> + if (ctx->rx_secret.len) {
> + err = tls_keyupdate_rx(sk, skb);
> + if (err) {
> + tls_err_abort(sk, err);
> + return err;
> + }
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + WRITE_ONCE(rx_ctx->key_update_pending, true);
> }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> /* On decrypt failure the connection is aborted (sk_err set) before
> - * returning a negative errno.
> + * returning a negative errno. Return 1 for a record the kernel consumed
> + * (a KeyUpdate): the caller frees it and does not pass it to the user.
> */
> static int tls_rx_one_record(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
> struct tls_decrypt_arg *darg)
> @@ -1883,6 +1894,11 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
> err = tls_rx_one_record(sk, msg, &darg);
> if (err < 0)
> goto recv_end;
> + if (err > 0) {
> + tls_rx_rec_done(ctx);
> + consume_skb(darg.skb);
> + continue;
> + }
>
> async |= darg.async;
>
> @@ -2019,9 +2035,8 @@ ssize_t tls_sw_splice_read(struct socket *sock, loff_t *ppos,
> if (err)
> goto splice_read_end;
>
> - if (!skb_queue_empty(&ctx->rx_list)) {
> - skb = __skb_dequeue(&ctx->rx_list);
> - } else {
> + skb = __skb_dequeue(&ctx->rx_list);
> + while (!skb) {
> struct tls_decrypt_arg darg;
>
> err = tls_rx_rec_wait(sk, flags & SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK,
> @@ -2036,7 +2051,10 @@ ssize_t tls_sw_splice_read(struct socket *sock, loff_t *ppos,
> goto splice_read_end;
>
> tls_rx_rec_done(ctx);
> - skb = darg.skb;
> + if (err > 0)
> + consume_skb(darg.skb);
> + else
> + skb = darg.skb;
> }
>
> rxm = strp_msg(skb);
> @@ -2118,6 +2136,11 @@ int tls_sw_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
> err = tls_rx_one_record(sk, NULL, &darg);
> if (err < 0)
> goto read_sock_end;
> + if (err > 0) {
> + tls_rx_rec_done(ctx);
> + consume_skb(darg.skb);
> + continue;
> + }
>
> released = tls_read_flush_backlog(sk, prot, INT_MAX,
> 0, decrypted,
>
The rest looks okay.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 0:36 [PATCH RFC net-next 0/5] tls: perform TLS 1.3 KeyUpdate in the kernel Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-26 0:36 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 1/5] tls: add HKDF-Expand-Label for the TLS 1.3 key schedule Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-26 7:27 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-10-26 11:25 ` Martin Belanger
2026-10-26 0:36 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 2/5] tls: add socket options to register the traffic secrets Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-26 7:37 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-10-26 11:27 ` Martin Belanger
2026-10-26 0:36 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 3/5] tls: update the RX key when a KeyUpdate is received Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-26 7:53 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2026-10-26 11:28 ` Martin Belanger
2026-10-26 0:36 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 4/5] tls: send a KeyUpdate at the record limit and on request Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-26 0:36 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 5/5] selftests/tls: add KeyUpdate tests Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8af172e4-0039-4dbb-970e-ab91b3d6e149@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.belanger@dell.com \
--cc=martin.nvme.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®