mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: martin.nvme.dev@gmail.com,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>, Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>,
	kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
	Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 3/5] tls: update the RX key when a KeyUpdate is received
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 08:53:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8af172e4-0039-4dbb-970e-ab91b3d6e149@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261025-keyupdate-rfc-v1-3-60b7756eccbd@gmail.com>

On 10/26/26 1:36 AM, Martin Belanger via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com>
> 
> When a KeyUpdate arrives, kTLS blocks reads with -EKEYEXPIRED until
> the user installs the next key. A kernel user such as nvme-tcp or
> sunrpc never does, so the connection stalls.
> 
> For a socket with a registered RX secret, derive the next key and
> install it when the KeyUpdate is decrypted. The record is not passed to
> the user, so recvmsg(), splice() and read_sock() go on to the next
> record. Without a registered secret the behavior is unchanged.
> 
> A KeyUpdate that is not alone in its record, has a wrong length or an
> invalid request_update value ends the connection, as RFC 9846 section
> 4.7.3 requires. So does a peer that sends more than 8 KeyUpdates in one
> second, the same limit as GnuTLS.
> 
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@dell.com>
> ---
>   include/net/tls.h       |   7 +++
>   net/tls/Makefile        |   3 +-
>   net/tls/tls.h           |   2 +
>   net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   net/tls/tls_sw.c        |  35 +++++++++--
>   5 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/tls.h b/include/net/tls.h
> index aacc6d12226e..a5bc28a7d1f5 100644
> --- a/include/net/tls.h
> +++ b/include/net/tls.h
> @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ struct tls_rec;
>   
>   #define TLS_HANDSHAKE_KEYUPDATE		24	/* rfc8446 B.3: Key update */
>   
> +/* KeyUpdate: msg_type, 24-bit length, request_update (RFC 9846 4.7.3) */
> +#define TLS_KEYUPDATE_MSG_SIZE		5
> +#define TLS_KEY_UPDATE_NOT_REQUESTED	0
> +#define TLS_KEY_UPDATE_REQUESTED	1
> +
>   #define TLS_AAD_SPACE_SIZE		13
>   
>   /* SHA-384, the longest hash of a TLS 1.3 cipher suite kTLS supports */
> @@ -142,6 +147,8 @@ struct tls_sw_context_rx {
>   	u8 zc_capable:1;
>   	u8 reader_contended:1;
>   	bool key_update_pending;
> +	u8 key_update_count;		/* received in this window */
> +	unsigned long key_update_window;	/* jiffies */
>   
>   	struct tls_strparser strp;
>   
> diff --git a/net/tls/Makefile b/net/tls/Makefile
> index 6edcf1271b75..ce8ac6a59f8c 100644
> --- a/net/tls/Makefile
> +++ b/net/tls/Makefile
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ CFLAGS_trace.o := -I$(src)
>   
>   obj-$(CONFIG_TLS) += tls.o
>   
> -tls-y := tls_main.o tls_sw.o tls_proc.o trace.o tls_strp.o tls_hkdf.o
> +tls-y := tls_main.o tls_sw.o tls_proc.o trace.o tls_strp.o tls_hkdf.o \
> +	 tls_keyupdate.o
>   
>   tls-$(CONFIG_TLS_DEVICE) += tls_device.o tls_device_fallback.o
> diff --git a/net/tls/tls.h b/net/tls/tls.h
> index b2061f6bf065..63ece8074985 100644
> --- a/net/tls/tls.h
> +++ b/net/tls/tls.h
> @@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ int init_prot_info(struct tls_prot_info *prot,
>   		   const struct tls_cipher_desc *cipher_desc);
>   int tls_hkdf_expand_label(const u8 *secret, size_t secret_len,
>   			  const char *label, u8 *out, size_t out_len);
> +int tls_keyupdate_rekey(struct sock *sk, int tx);
> +int tls_keyupdate_rx(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
>   int tls_set_sw_offload(struct sock *sk, int tx,
>   		       struct tls_crypto_info *new_crypto_info);
>   void tls_update_rx_zc_capable(struct tls_context *tls_ctx);
> diff --git a/net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c b/net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..543bf57599c7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/net/tls/tls_keyupdate.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/* Copyright (c) 2026 Dell Technologies Inc. or its subsidiaries.
> + *
> + * TLS 1.3 KeyUpdate, RFC 9846 sections 4.7.3 and 7.2.
> + *
> + * A TLS 1.3 peer can change the key of the direction it sends in at any
> + * time. It sends a KeyUpdate message, then encrypts all later records
> + * with the next key. A sender must also change its key before the key
> + * has protected too many records (section 5.5).
> + *
> + * The next key is derived from the application traffic secret, not from
> + * the current key. User space gives the kernel only the key and IV, so
> + * the kernel cannot derive the next key on its own. Without the secret,
> + * a received KeyUpdate goes to the application, and the kernel stops
> + * decrypting until the application installs the next key with TLS_RX.
> + *
> + * With TLS_TX_TRAFFIC_SECRET or TLS_RX_TRAFFIC_SECRET, user space also
> + * gives the kernel the secret of that direction. The kernel then handles
> + * KeyUpdate itself. This file derives and installs the next key, and
> + * processes a received KeyUpdate. tls_sw.c sends KeyUpdate messages.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
> +#include <linux/skbuff.h>
> +#include <net/strparser.h>
> +#include <net/tls.h>
> +
> +#include "tls.h"
> +
> +/* A peer that sends more KeyUpdates than this in one second ends the
> + * connection. Each one costs three HMACs and a new key, and carries no
> + * data.
> + */
> +#define TLS_KEYUPDATE_RX_MAX_PER_SEC	8
> +
> +/**
> + * tls_keyupdate_rekey - install the next key of one direction
> + * @sk: socket
> + * @tx: non-zero for the transmit direction
> + *
> + * Derive the next application traffic secret from the registered one,
> + * then its key and IV, and install them. The record sequence number
> + * restarts at zero.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, or a negative errno. On error the installed key
> + * and the registered secret do not change.
> + */
> +int tls_keyupdate_rekey(struct sock *sk, int tx)
> +{
> +	struct tls_context *ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
> +	struct tls_traffic_secret *secret;
> +	const struct tls_cipher_desc *cipher_desc;
> +	u8 iv[TLS_MAX_SALT_SIZE + TLS_MAX_IV_SIZE];
> +	u8 next[TLS_MAX_TRAFFIC_SECRET_SIZE];
> +	union tls_crypto_context tmp = {};
> +	struct tls_crypto_info *info = &tmp.info;
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	secret = tx ? &ctx->tx_secret : &ctx->rx_secret;
> +	cipher_desc = get_cipher_desc(ctx->prot_info.cipher_type);
> +	if (!cipher_desc || !secret->len ||
> +	    cipher_desc->salt + cipher_desc->iv > sizeof(iv))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* version and cipher_type; the rest of tmp stays zero */
> +	*info = tx ? ctx->crypto_send.info : ctx->crypto_recv.info;
> +
> +	rc = tls_hkdf_expand_label(secret->data, secret->len, "traffic upd",
> +				   next, secret->len);
> +	if (rc)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	rc = tls_hkdf_expand_label(next, secret->len, "key",
> +				   crypto_info_key(info, cipher_desc),
> +				   cipher_desc->key);
> +	if (rc)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	rc = tls_hkdf_expand_label(next, secret->len, "iv", iv,
> +				   cipher_desc->salt + cipher_desc->iv);
> +	if (rc)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	memcpy(crypto_info_salt(info, cipher_desc), iv, cipher_desc->salt);
> +	memcpy(crypto_info_iv(info, cipher_desc), iv + cipher_desc->salt,
> +	       cipher_desc->iv);
> +
> +	rc = tls_set_sw_offload(sk, tx, info);
> +	if (rc)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	memcpy(secret->data, next, secret->len);
> +
> +out:
> +	memzero_explicit(next, sizeof(next));
> +	memzero_explicit(iv, sizeof(iv));
> +	memzero_explicit(&tmp, sizeof(tmp));
> +
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +
Hmm. So this calculates 'iv' and 'key' from the traffic secret.
But as it does, why can't we use it to calculate the _initial_ 'iv' and 
'key' from the traffic secret?
IE wouldn't it make sense to allow for _just_ the (initial) traffic
secrets to be set, and calculate 'iv' and 'key' on the fly _always?
That would remove the possible admin error where the admin sets a
set of 'IV' and 'key' values which do _not_ match the traffic secrets.

Hmm?

> +/**
> + * tls_keyupdate_rx - process a received KeyUpdate
> + * @sk: socket
> + * @skb: the decrypted record, which starts with a KeyUpdate message
> + *
> + * Called with the socket locked, for a direction with a registered
> + * secret. The caller does not pass the record to the user.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, or a negative errno if the connection must end.
> + */
> +int tls_keyupdate_rx(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	struct tls_context *ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
> +	struct tls_sw_context_rx *rx_ctx = tls_sw_ctx_rx(ctx);
> +	const struct strp_msg *rxm = strp_msg(skb);
> +	u8 msg[TLS_KEYUPDATE_MSG_SIZE];
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	/* A KeyUpdate must end its record (section 5.1). Another message
> +	 * in the same record is not supported.
> +	 */
> +	if (rxm->full_len != sizeof(msg) ||
> +	    skb_copy_bits(skb, rxm->offset, msg, sizeof(msg)))
> +		return -EBADMSG;
> +
> +	/* msg_type, a 24-bit length of 1, then request_update */
> +	if (msg[1] || msg[2] || msg[3] != 1)
> +		return -EBADMSG;
> +	if (msg[4] != TLS_KEY_UPDATE_NOT_REQUESTED &&
> +	    msg[4] != TLS_KEY_UPDATE_REQUESTED)
> +		return -EBADMSG;
> +
> +	if (!rx_ctx->key_update_count ||
> +	    time_after(jiffies, rx_ctx->key_update_window + HZ)) {
> +		rx_ctx->key_update_window = jiffies;
> +		rx_ctx->key_update_count = 0;
> +	}
> +	if (++rx_ctx->key_update_count > TLS_KEYUPDATE_RX_MAX_PER_SEC)
> +		return -EBADMSG;
> +
> +	rc = tls_keyupdate_rekey(sk, 0);
> +	if (rc) {
> +		TLS_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TLSRXREKEYERROR);
> +		return rc;
> +	}
> +	TLS_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TLSRXREKEYOK);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> index 312e51270f29..a314fa638dc3 100644
> --- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> +++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> @@ -1551,15 +1551,26 @@ static int tls_check_pending_rekey(struct sock *sk, struct tls_context *ctx,
>   	if (hs_type == TLS_HANDSHAKE_KEYUPDATE) {
>   		struct tls_sw_context_rx *rx_ctx = ctx->priv_ctx_rx;
>   
> -		WRITE_ONCE(rx_ctx->key_update_pending, true);
>   		TLS_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TLSRXREKEYRECEIVED);
> +
> +		if (ctx->rx_secret.len) {
> +			err = tls_keyupdate_rx(sk, skb);
> +			if (err) {
> +				tls_err_abort(sk, err);
> +				return err;
> +			}
> +			return 1;
> +		}
> +
> +		WRITE_ONCE(rx_ctx->key_update_pending, true);
>   	}
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
>   /* On decrypt failure the connection is aborted (sk_err set) before
> - * returning a negative errno.
> + * returning a negative errno. Return 1 for a record the kernel consumed
> + * (a KeyUpdate): the caller frees it and does not pass it to the user.
>    */
>   static int tls_rx_one_record(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>   			     struct tls_decrypt_arg *darg)
> @@ -1883,6 +1894,11 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
>   		err = tls_rx_one_record(sk, msg, &darg);
>   		if (err < 0)
>   			goto recv_end;
> +		if (err > 0) {
> +			tls_rx_rec_done(ctx);
> +			consume_skb(darg.skb);
> +			continue;
> +		}
>   
>   		async |= darg.async;
>   
> @@ -2019,9 +2035,8 @@ ssize_t tls_sw_splice_read(struct socket *sock,  loff_t *ppos,
>   	if (err)
>   		goto splice_read_end;
>   
> -	if (!skb_queue_empty(&ctx->rx_list)) {
> -		skb = __skb_dequeue(&ctx->rx_list);
> -	} else {
> +	skb = __skb_dequeue(&ctx->rx_list);
> +	while (!skb) {
>   		struct tls_decrypt_arg darg;
>   
>   		err = tls_rx_rec_wait(sk, flags & SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK,
> @@ -2036,7 +2051,10 @@ ssize_t tls_sw_splice_read(struct socket *sock,  loff_t *ppos,
>   			goto splice_read_end;
>   
>   		tls_rx_rec_done(ctx);
> -		skb = darg.skb;
> +		if (err > 0)
> +			consume_skb(darg.skb);
> +		else
> +			skb = darg.skb;
>   	}
>   
>   	rxm = strp_msg(skb);
> @@ -2118,6 +2136,11 @@ int tls_sw_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
>   			err = tls_rx_one_record(sk, NULL, &darg);
>   			if (err < 0)
>   				goto read_sock_end;
> +			if (err > 0) {
> +				tls_rx_rec_done(ctx);
> +				consume_skb(darg.skb);
> +				continue;
> +			}
>   
>   			released = tls_read_flush_backlog(sk, prot, INT_MAX,
>   							  0, decrypted,
> 

The rest looks okay.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                  Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de                                +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-26  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-26  0:36 [PATCH RFC net-next 0/5] tls: perform TLS 1.3 KeyUpdate in the kernel Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-26  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 1/5] tls: add HKDF-Expand-Label for the TLS 1.3 key schedule Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-26  7:27   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-10-26 11:25     ` Martin Belanger
2026-10-26  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 2/5] tls: add socket options to register the traffic secrets Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-26  7:37   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-10-26 11:27     ` Martin Belanger
2026-10-26  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 3/5] tls: update the RX key when a KeyUpdate is received Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-26  7:53   ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2026-10-26 11:28     ` Martin Belanger
2026-10-26  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 4/5] tls: send a KeyUpdate at the record limit and on request Martin Belanger via B4 Relay
2026-10-26  0:36 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 5/5] selftests/tls: add KeyUpdate tests Martin Belanger via B4 Relay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8af172e4-0039-4dbb-970e-ab91b3d6e149@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=hare@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=martin.belanger@dell.com \
    --cc=martin.nvme.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®