mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
	coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, broonie@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
	acme@kernel.org
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
	Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>,
	Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>,
	Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
	Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] arm64: KVM: Write TRFCR value on guest switch with nVHE
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 09:50:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ba4d3dd-6ab2-49e3-9d25-d742e4958afc@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240104162714.1062610-7-james.clark@arm.com>

On 04/01/2024 16:27, James Clark wrote:
> The guest value for TRFCR requested by the Coresight driver is saved in
> kvm_host_global_state. On guest switch this value needs to be written to
> the register. Currently TRFCR is only modified when we want to disable
> trace completely in guests due to an issue with TRBE. Expand the
> __debug_save_trace() function to always write to the register if a
> different value for guests is required, but also keep the existing TRBE
> disable behavior if that's required.
> 
> The TRFCR restore function remains functionally the same, except a value
> of 0 doesn't mean "don't restore" anymore. Now that we save both guest
> and host values the register is restored any time the guest and host
> values differ.
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/debug-sr.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++------------
>   1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/debug-sr.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/debug-sr.c
> index 4558c02eb352..7fd876d4f034 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/debug-sr.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/debug-sr.c
> @@ -51,32 +51,45 @@ static void __debug_restore_spe(u64 pmscr_el1)
>   	write_sysreg_s(pmscr_el1, SYS_PMSCR_EL1);
>   }
>   
> -static void __debug_save_trace(u64 *trfcr_el1)
> +/*
> + * Save TRFCR and disable trace completely if TRBE is being used, otherwise
> + * apply required guest TRFCR value.
> + */
> +static void __debug_save_trace(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   {
> -	*trfcr_el1 = 0;
> +	u64 host_trfcr_el1 = read_sysreg_s(SYS_TRFCR_EL1);
> +	u64 guest_trfcr_el1;
> +
> +	vcpu->arch.host_debug_state.trfcr_el1 = host_trfcr_el1;
>   
>   	/* Check if the TRBE is enabled */
> -	if (!(read_sysreg_s(SYS_TRBLIMITR_EL1) & TRBLIMITR_EL1_E))
> -		return;
> -	/*
> -	 * Prohibit trace generation while we are in guest.
> -	 * Since access to TRFCR_EL1 is trapped, the guest can't
> -	 * modify the filtering set by the host.
> -	 */
> -	*trfcr_el1 = read_sysreg_s(SYS_TRFCR_EL1);
> -	write_sysreg_s(0, SYS_TRFCR_EL1);
> -	isb();
> -	/* Drain the trace buffer to memory */
> -	tsb_csync();
> +	if (vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE) &&
> +	    (read_sysreg_s(SYS_TRBLIMITR_EL1) & TRBLIMITR_EL1_E)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Prohibit trace generation while we are in guest. Since access
> +		 * to TRFCR_EL1 is trapped, the guest can't modify the filtering
> +		 * set by the host.
> +		 */
> +		write_sysreg_s(0, SYS_TRFCR_EL1);
> +		isb();
> +		/* Drain the trace buffer to memory */
> +		tsb_csync();
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * Not using TRBE, so guest trace works. Apply the guest filters
> +		 * provided by the Coresight driver, if different.
> +		 */
> +		guest_trfcr_el1 = kvm_host_global_state[vcpu->cpu].guest_trfcr_el1;
> +		if (host_trfcr_el1 != guest_trfcr_el1)
> +			write_sysreg_s(guest_trfcr_el1, SYS_TRFCR_EL1);
> +	}
>   }
>   
>   static void __debug_restore_trace(u64 trfcr_el1)
>   {
> -	if (!trfcr_el1)
> -		return;
> -
>   	/* Restore trace filter controls */
> -	write_sysreg_s(trfcr_el1, SYS_TRFCR_EL1);
> +	if (trfcr_el1 != read_sysreg_s(SYS_TRFCR_EL1))
> +		write_sysreg_s(trfcr_el1, SYS_TRFCR_EL1);

Could we not write it unconditionally here ? In the saving step, we have
to save the host setting. But while restoring, we could skip the check.
A read and write is probably the same cost, as the value is implicitly
synchronized by a later ISB.

Eitherways,

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>


>   }
>   
>   void __debug_save_host_buffers_nvhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -85,8 +98,8 @@ void __debug_save_host_buffers_nvhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   	if (vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_SPE))
>   		__debug_save_spe(&vcpu->arch.host_debug_state.pmscr_el1);
>   	/* Disable and flush Self-Hosted Trace generation */
> -	if (vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE))
> -		__debug_save_trace(&vcpu->arch.host_debug_state.trfcr_el1);
> +	if (vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRFCR))
> +		__debug_save_trace(vcpu);
>   }
>   
>   void __debug_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -98,7 +111,7 @@ void __debug_restore_host_buffers_nvhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   {
>   	if (vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_SPE))
>   		__debug_restore_spe(vcpu->arch.host_debug_state.pmscr_el1);
> -	if (vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE))
> +	if (vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRFCR))
>   		__debug_restore_trace(vcpu->arch.host_debug_state.trfcr_el1);
>   }
>   


  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-05  9:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-04 16:27 [PATCH v4 0/7] kvm/coresight: Support exclude guest and exclude host James Clark
2024-01-04 16:27 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] arm64: KVM: Fix renamed function in comment James Clark
2024-01-04 16:58   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-01-04 16:27 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] arm64: KVM: Use shared area to pass PMU event state to hypervisor James Clark
2024-01-05  9:40   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-02-01 16:14   ` James Clark
2024-02-02 22:00   ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-05 12:16     ` James Clark
2024-02-05 13:04       ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-05 13:15         ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-05 13:21           ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-05 14:16             ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-05 14:17             ` James Clark
2024-02-05 14:52               ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-05 15:37                 ` James Clark
2024-02-05 15:50                   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-05 16:38                     ` Oliver Upton
2024-01-04 16:27 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] arm64/sysreg/tools: Move TRFCR definitions to sysreg James Clark
2024-01-05  9:18   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-01-05  9:59     ` James Clark
2024-01-04 16:27 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] arm64: KVM: Add iflag for FEAT_TRF James Clark
2024-01-04 16:27 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] arm64: KVM: Add interface to set guest value for TRFCR register James Clark
2024-01-05  9:20   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-01-04 16:27 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] arm64: KVM: Write TRFCR value on guest switch with nVHE James Clark
2024-01-05  9:50   ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2024-01-05 10:05     ` James Clark
2024-01-04 16:27 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] coresight: Pass guest TRFCR value to KVM James Clark
2024-01-05  9:55   ` Suzuki K Poulose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8ba4d3dd-6ab2-49e3-9d25-d742e4958afc@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=akihiko.odaki@daynix.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
    --cc=jintack.lim@linaro.org \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=miguel.luis@oracle.com \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®