From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] allow execve'ing "/proc/self/exe" even if /proc is not mounted
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:07:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0906241707k14d09df5t6aa3229ed115b478@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090624235856.GZ8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 19:58, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 01:00:56AM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> More elegant way is to execute /proc/self/exe.
>> This works just fine as long as /proc is mounted.
>
> So mount it.
well, in the busybox case, in order to run mount you might have to
exec yourself first ...
> No. This is just plain sick. Magical pathnames have no business being
> in the kernel. If procfs is too much for your sensitive soul, do an
> extremely trimmed-down version that would consist of *one* *file* (yes,
> as root and only node on fs). Said file being a procfs-style symlink,
> doing exactly what /proc/self/exec would do.
>
> On such system you can just mkdir /proc/self, touch /proc/self/exec,
> mount -t self_exec none /proc/self/exec and be done with that. No
> magic needed, end of the story.
if that is acceptable, how about a special binfmt that depends on
EMBEDDED and we put the magic there.
-mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-25 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-24 23:00 Denys Vlasenko
2009-06-24 23:21 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-24 23:49 ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-06-24 14:51 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-25 0:26 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-26 8:06 ` Florian Weimer
2009-06-24 23:58 ` Al Viro
2009-06-25 0:07 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2009-06-26 23:18 ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-06-25 8:10 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-26 8:00 ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-06-26 13:26 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-26 22:55 ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-06-28 19:31 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-25 18:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-25 18:16 ` Mike Frysinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8bd0f97a0906241707k14d09df5t6aa3229ed115b478@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®