From: Bard liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tiwai@suse.de, broonie@kernel.org,
vkoul@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jank@cadence.com,
srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, slawomir.blauciak@intel.com,
Rander Wang <rander.wang@linux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
Hui Wang <hui.wang@canonical.com>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com>,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] regmap: sdw: add support for SoundWire 1.2 MBQ
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 08:59:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8bd9593d-c81d-d01b-ee93-b15de2fe7f1f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200825171656.75836-5-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
On 8/26/2020 1:16 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> The SoundWire 1.1 specification only allowed for reads and writes of
> bytes. The SoundWire 1.2 specification adds a new capability to
> transfer "Multi-Byte Quantities" (MBQ) across the bus. The transfers
> still happens one-byte-at-a-time, but the update is atomic.
>
> For example when writing a 16-bit volume, the first byte transferred
> is only taken into account when the second byte is successfully
> transferred.
>
> The mechanism is symmetrical for read and writes:
> - On a read, the address of the last byte to be read is modified by
> setting the MBQ bit
> - On a write, the address of all but the last byte to be written are
> modified by setting the MBQ bit. The address for the last byte relies
> on the MBQ bit being cleared.
>
> The current definitions for MBQ-based controls in the SDCA draft
> standard are limited to 16 bits for volumes, so for now this is the
> only supported format. An update will be provided if and when support
> for 24-bit and 32-bit values is specified by the SDCA standard.
>
> One possible objection is that this code could have been handled with
> regmap-sdw.c. However this is a new spec addition not handled by every
> SoundWire 1.1 and non-SDCA device, so there's no reason to load code
> that will never be used.
>
> Also in practice it's extremely unlikely that CONFIG_REGMAP would not
> be selected with CONFIG_REGMAP_MBQ selected. However there's no
> functional dependency between the two modules so they can be selected
> separately.
>
> Reviewed-by: Rander Wang <rander.wang@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-26 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-25 17:16 [PATCH 0/4] regmap: add SoundWire 1.2 MBQ support Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-25 17:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] regmap: sdw: move to -EOPNOTSUPP Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-25 21:48 ` Mark Brown
2020-08-25 22:08 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-26 9:56 ` Mark Brown
2020-08-26 10:09 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-08-26 10:13 ` Mark Brown
2020-08-26 10:22 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-08-26 12:03 ` Vinod Koul
2020-08-26 15:05 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-26 17:25 ` Mark Brown
2020-08-26 18:08 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-25 17:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] regmap: sdw: add required header files Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-25 17:16 ` [PATCH 3/4] soundwire: SDCA: add helper macro to access controls Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-26 1:04 ` Bard liao
2020-08-26 8:55 ` Vinod Koul
2020-08-26 15:00 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-26 16:40 ` Vinod Koul
2020-08-25 17:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] regmap: sdw: add support for SoundWire 1.2 MBQ Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-26 0:59 ` Bard liao [this message]
2020-08-26 9:05 ` Vinod Koul
2020-08-26 16:57 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-28 7:23 ` Vinod Koul
2020-08-28 14:49 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-26 10:16 ` Mark Brown
2020-08-26 14:54 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8bd9593d-c81d-d01b-ee93-b15de2fe7f1f@linux.intel.com \
--to=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hui.wang@canonical.com \
--cc=jank@cadence.com \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rander.wang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=slawomir.blauciak@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome