From: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] testing! arm64: dts: qcom: decrease WiFi antenna regulator minimum to 3.0V
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 12:46:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d54edae-23d3-43ce-8a99-7c4791a4b857@ixit.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea4877a6-3032-4710-a563-99230b6f861d@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 05/02/2026 11:51, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 2/5/26 10:58 AM, David Heidelberg wrote:
>> On 05/02/2026 10:05, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 2/4/26 6:03 PM, David Heidelberg via B4 Relay wrote:
>>>> From: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
>>>>
>>>> Downstream defines minimal voltage as 3.0 V, while when OnePlus 6 was
>>>> introduced to Linux mainline, the value was fixed to maximum 3.3V.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
>>>> ---
>>>> Tested for ~ 1 month. Seems to work well, no visible issues anywhere.
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi | 4 ++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi
>>>> index 5b121ea5520f5..e950db41ce25a 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi
>>>> @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ vreg_l20a_2p95: ldo20 {
>>>> };
>>>> vreg_l23a_3p3: ldo23 {
>>>> - regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3000000>;
>>>> regulator-max-microvolt = <3312000>;
>>>> regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>;
>>>> };
>>>> @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ vreg_l24a_3p075: ldo24 {
>>>> };
>>>> vreg_l25a_3p3: ldo25 {
>>>> - regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3000000>;
>>>> regulator-max-microvolt = <3312000>;
>>>
>>> A datasheet tells me this is out of spec for this wireless chip
>>
>> As I don't have the datasheet, can you clarify if the 3.3 - 3.312V is the correct range which should be kept?
>
> These settings are OK.
>
> Konrad
Good, I'm dropping the patch then!
Thank you
David
--
David Heidelberg
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-05 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-04 17:03 David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-02-05 9:05 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-02-05 9:58 ` David Heidelberg
2026-02-05 10:51 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-02-05 11:46 ` David Heidelberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d54edae-23d3-43ce-8a99-7c4791a4b857@ixit.cz \
--to=david@ixit.cz \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phone-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®