From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] testing! arm64: dts: qcom: decrease WiFi antenna regulator minimum to 3.0V
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 11:51:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea4877a6-3032-4710-a563-99230b6f861d@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <851db388-61dc-4916-91fa-32b96113d4aa@ixit.cz>
On 2/5/26 10:58 AM, David Heidelberg wrote:
> On 05/02/2026 10:05, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 2/4/26 6:03 PM, David Heidelberg via B4 Relay wrote:
>>> From: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
>>>
>>> Downstream defines minimal voltage as 3.0 V, while when OnePlus 6 was
>>> introduced to Linux mainline, the value was fixed to maximum 3.3V.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
>>> ---
>>> Tested for ~ 1 month. Seems to work well, no visible issues anywhere.
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi
>>> index 5b121ea5520f5..e950db41ce25a 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi
>>> @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ vreg_l20a_2p95: ldo20 {
>>> };
>>> vreg_l23a_3p3: ldo23 {
>>> - regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3000000>;
>>> regulator-max-microvolt = <3312000>;
>>> regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>;
>>> };
>>> @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ vreg_l24a_3p075: ldo24 {
>>> };
>>> vreg_l25a_3p3: ldo25 {
>>> - regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3000000>;
>>> regulator-max-microvolt = <3312000>;
>>
>> A datasheet tells me this is out of spec for this wireless chip
>
> As I don't have the datasheet, can you clarify if the 3.3 - 3.312V is the correct range which should be kept?
These settings are OK.
Konrad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-05 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-04 17:03 David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-02-05 9:05 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-02-05 9:58 ` David Heidelberg
2026-02-05 10:51 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2026-02-05 11:46 ` David Heidelberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea4877a6-3032-4710-a563-99230b6f861d@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=david@ixit.cz \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phone-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®