From: Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] tick/sched: Forward timer even in nohz mode
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 14:12:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f0763efd927f791b1c13ca65712a2380985297a.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1576538545-13274-1-git-send-email-swood@redhat.com>
On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 18:22 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> Currently when exiting nohz, the expiry will be forwarded as if we
> had just run the timer. If we re-enter nohz before this new expiry,
> and exit after, this forwarding will happen again. If this load pattern
> recurs the tick can be indefinitely postponed.
>
> To avoid this, use last_tick as-is rather than calling hrtimer_forward().
> However, in some cases the tick *will* have just run (despite being
> "stopped"), and leading to double timer execution.
>
> To avoid that, forward the timer after every tick (regardless of nohz
> status) and keep last_tick up-to-date. During nohz, last_tick will
> reflect what the expiry would have been if not in nohz mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 11 +++++------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Any comments on these patches?
Thanks,
Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-06 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-16 23:22 Scott Wood
2019-12-16 23:22 ` [PATCH 2/4] tick/sched: Set last_tick in init paths Scott Wood
2019-12-16 23:22 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched/core: Don't skip remote tick for idle cpus Scott Wood
2019-12-16 23:22 ` [PATCH 4/4] timers/nohz: Update nohz load in remote tick Scott Wood
2020-01-07 9:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-06 20:12 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2020-01-06 22:18 ` [PATCH 1/4] tick/sched: Forward timer even in nohz mode Frederic Weisbecker
2020-01-08 23:18 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8f0763efd927f791b1c13ca65712a2380985297a.camel@redhat.com \
--to=swood@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®