mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chen, Zide" <zide.chen@intel.com>
To: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>,
	Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@google.com>,
	Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/4] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix die ID init and look up bugs
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 09:58:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f257e9d-6a39-438c-9c41-6f68e2ef6d62@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c18ccaf6-3b4d-486a-9d88-76dd715902a2@linux.intel.com>



On 3/15/2026 11:53 PM, Mi, Dapeng wrote:
> 
> On 3/14/2026 1:40 AM, Zide Chen wrote:
>> In snbep_pci2phy_map_init(), in the nr_node_ids > 8 path,
>> uncore_device_to_die() may return -1 when all CPUs associated
>> with the UBOX device are offline.
>>
>> Remove the WARN_ON_ONCE(die_id == -1) check for two reasons:
>>
>> - The current code breaks out of the loop. This is incorrect because
>>   pci_get_device() does not guarantee iteration in domain or bus order,
>>   so additional UBOX devices may be skipped during the scan.
>>
>> - Returning -EINVAL is incorrect, since marking offline buses with
>>   die_id == -1 is expected and should not be treated as an error.
>>
>> Separately, when NUMA is disabled on a NUMA-capable platform,
>> pcibus_to_node() returns NUMA_NO_NODE, causing uncore_device_to_die()
>> to return -1 for all PCI devices.  As a result,
>> spr_update_device_location(), used on Intel SPR and EMR, ignores the
>> corresponding PMON units and does not add them to the RB tree.
>>
>> Fix this by using uncore_pcibus_to_dieid(), which retrieves topology
>> from the UBOX GIDNIDMAP register and works regardless of whether NUMA
>> is enabled in Linux.  This requires snbep_pci2phy_map_init() to be
>> added in spr_uncore_pci_init().
>>
>> Keep uncore_device_to_die() only for the nr_node_ids > 8 case, where
>> NUMA is expected to be enabled.
>>
>> Fixes: 9a7832ce3d92 ("perf/x86/intel/uncore: With > 8 nodes, get pci bus die id from NUMA info")
>> Fixes: 65248a9a9ee1 ("perf/x86/uncore: Add a quirk for UPI on SPR")
>> Tested-by: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
>> ---
>> V2:
>> - Fix the commit message to note that spr_update_device_location() is
>>   used by EMR, not GNR.
>> - Rewrite the commit message for clarity.
>> - Add a Tested-by tag.
>>
>> V4: no changes.
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c       |  1 +
>>  arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c | 13 ++++++-------
>>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
>> index 786bd51a0d89..e9cc1ba921c5 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
>> @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ int uncore_die_to_segment(int die)
>>  	return bus ? pci_domain_nr(bus) : -EINVAL;
>>  }
>>  
>> +/* Note: This API can only be used when NUMA information is available. */
>>  int uncore_device_to_die(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>  {
>>  	int node = pcibus_to_node(dev->bus);
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
>> index 9b51883fd6fd..421378f681d7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
>> @@ -1459,13 +1459,7 @@ static int snbep_pci2phy_map_init(int devid, int nodeid_loc, int idmap_loc, bool
>>  			}
>>  
>>  			map->pbus_to_dieid[bus] = die_id = uncore_device_to_die(ubox_dev);
> 
> The "die_id" variable is not needed any more after removing below check,
> please remove it.

Good catch, thanks.

> Others look good to me. Thanks.
> 
> 
>> -
>>  			raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
>> -
>> -			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(die_id == -1)) {
>> -				err = -EINVAL;
>> -				break;
>> -			}
>>  		}
>>  	}
>>  
>> @@ -6420,7 +6414,7 @@ static void spr_update_device_location(int type_id)
>>  
>>  	while ((dev = pci_get_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, device, dev)) != NULL) {
>>  
>> -		die = uncore_device_to_die(dev);
>> +		die = uncore_pcibus_to_dieid(dev->bus);
>>  		if (die < 0)
>>  			continue;
>>  
>> @@ -6444,6 +6438,11 @@ static void spr_update_device_location(int type_id)
>>  
>>  int spr_uncore_pci_init(void)
>>  {
>> +	int ret = snbep_pci2phy_map_init(0x3250, SKX_CPUNODEID, SKX_GIDNIDMAP, true);
>> +
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>>  	/*
>>  	 * The discovery table of UPI on some SPR variant is broken,
>>  	 * which impacts the detection of both UPI and M3UPI uncore PMON.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-16 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-13 17:40 [PATCH V4 0/4] Miscellaneous Intel uncore patches Zide Chen
2026-03-13 17:40 ` [PATCH V4 1/4] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix iounmap() leak on global_init failure Zide Chen
2026-04-07  7:06   ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Zide Chen
2026-03-13 17:40 ` [PATCH V4 2/4] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Skip discovery table for offline dies Zide Chen
2026-04-07  7:06   ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Zide Chen
2026-03-13 17:40 ` [PATCH V4 3/4] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix die ID init and look up bugs Zide Chen
2026-03-16  6:53   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-03-16 16:58     ` Chen, Zide [this message]
2026-04-07  7:06   ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Zide Chen
2026-03-13 17:40 ` [PATCH V4 4/4] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Remove extra double quote mark Zide Chen
2026-04-07  7:06   ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Zide Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8f257e9d-6a39-438c-9c41-6f68e2ef6d62@intel.com \
    --to=zide.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ctshao@google.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=steve.wahl@hpe.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®