Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] thermal: core: Reimplement locking through guards

[Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>]

On 10/22/24 10:57, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi Lukasz,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 12:02 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> On 10/21/24 12:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 8:51 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 12:22 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a continuation of
>>>>>
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/2215082.irdbgypaU6@rjwysocki.net/
>>>>>
>>>>> and (quite obviously) it is based on that series.
>>>>>
>>>>> The majority of the patches in it are new iterations of patches included in
>>>>>
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/6100907.lOV4Wx5bFT@rjwysocki.net/
>>>>>
>>>>> and there is one new patch ([02/11]).
>>>>>
>>>>> All of these patches are related to locking, but some of them are preparatory.
>>>>>
>>>>> The series as a whole introduces guards for thermal zones and cooling devices
>>>>> and uses them to re-implement locking in the thermal core.  It also uses mutex
>>>>> guards for thermal_list_lock and thermal_governor_lock locking.
>>>>>
>>>>> As usual, the details are described by the individual patch changelogs.
>>>>
>>>> This material is now present in the thermal-core-experimental branch
>>>> in linux-pm.git.
>>>
>>> I gather that it is not controversial as it was covered in the PM+TC
>>> session at the LPC and it has been around for quite a while, so I've
>>> just queued it up for 6.13.
>>
>> If it's not too late, I will do the review tomorrow.
> 
> No, it isn't, please do!

OK, I will do that today.