mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
To: Wang Liang <wangliang74@huawei.com>,
	idosch@nvidia.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org
Cc: bridge@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yuehaibing@huawei.com,
	zhangchangzhong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: bridge: fix soft lockup in br_multicast_query_expired()
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 13:08:35 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9071898b-ad70-45f1-a671-89448ea168df@blackwall.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250806094941.1285944-1-wangliang74@huawei.com>

On 8/6/25 12:49, Wang Liang wrote:
> When set multicast_query_interval to a large value, the local variable
> 'time' in br_multicast_send_query() may overflow. If the time is smaller
> than jiffies, the timer will expire immediately, and then call mod_timer()
> again, which creates a loop and may trigger the following soft lockup
> issue:
> 
>   watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 221s! [rb_consumer:66]
>   CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 66 Comm: rb_consumer Not tainted 6.16.0+ #259 PREEMPT(none)
>   Call Trace:
>    <IRQ>
>    __netdev_alloc_skb+0x2e/0x3a0
>    br_ip6_multicast_alloc_query+0x212/0x1b70
>    __br_multicast_send_query+0x376/0xac0
>    br_multicast_send_query+0x299/0x510
>    br_multicast_query_expired.constprop.0+0x16d/0x1b0
>    call_timer_fn+0x3b/0x2a0
>    __run_timers+0x619/0x950
>    run_timer_softirq+0x11c/0x220
>    handle_softirqs+0x18e/0x560
>    __irq_exit_rcu+0x158/0x1a0
>    sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x76/0x90
>    </IRQ>
> 
> This issue can be reproduced with:
>   ip link add br0 type bridge
>   echo 1 > /sys/class/net/br0/bridge/multicast_querier
>   echo 0xffffffffffffffff >
>   	/sys/class/net/br0/bridge/multicast_query_interval
>   ip link set dev br0 up
> 
> Fix this by comparing expire time with jiffies, to avoid the timer loop.
> 
> Fixes: 7e4df51eb35d ("bridge: netlink: add support for igmp's intervals")
> Signed-off-by: Wang Liang <wangliang74@huawei.com>
> ---
>  net/bridge/br_multicast.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> index 1377f31b719c..631ae3b4c45d 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> @@ -1892,7 +1892,8 @@ static void br_multicast_send_query(struct net_bridge_mcast *brmctx,
>  	time += own_query->startup_sent < brmctx->multicast_startup_query_count ?
>  		brmctx->multicast_startup_query_interval :
>  		brmctx->multicast_query_interval;
> -	mod_timer(&own_query->timer, time);
> +	if (time_is_after_jiffies(time))
> +		mod_timer(&own_query->timer, time);
>  }
>  
>  static void

This is the wrong way to fix it, it is a configuration issue, so we could either
cap the value at something that noone uses, e.g. 24 hours, or we could make sure time
is at least 1s (that is BR_MULTICAST_QUERY_INTVL_MIN).

The simple fix would be to do a min(time, BR_MULTICAST_QUERY_INTVL_MIN), but I'd go
for something similar to:
 commit 99b40610956a
 Author: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
 Date:   Mon Dec 27 19:21:15 2021 +0200

     net: bridge: mcast: add and enforce query interval minimum

for the maximum to avoid the overflow altogether. By the way multicast_startup_query_interval 
would also cause the same issue, so you'd have to cap it.

Cheers,
 Nik


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-06 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-06  9:49 Wang Liang
2025-08-06 10:08 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov [this message]
2025-08-07 10:36   ` Wang Liang
2025-08-10 10:02     ` Nikolay Aleksandrov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9071898b-ad70-45f1-a671-89448ea168df@blackwall.org \
    --to=razor@blackwall.org \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=wangliang74@huawei.com \
    --cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangchangzhong@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®