From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
To: Wang Liang <wangliang74@huawei.com>,
idosch@nvidia.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org
Cc: bridge@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yuehaibing@huawei.com,
zhangchangzhong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: bridge: fix soft lockup in br_multicast_query_expired()
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 13:02:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d5d95e23-8b1e-4b18-bf15-b627d4193684@blackwall.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b374635-2444-453f-a7bd-7e732184998e@huawei.com>
On 8/7/25 13:36, Wang Liang wrote:
>
> 在 2025/8/6 18:08, Nikolay Aleksandrov 写道:
>> On 8/6/25 12:49, Wang Liang wrote:
>>> When set multicast_query_interval to a large value, the local variable
>>> 'time' in br_multicast_send_query() may overflow. If the time is smaller
>>> than jiffies, the timer will expire immediately, and then call mod_timer()
>>> again, which creates a loop and may trigger the following soft lockup
>>> issue:
>>>
>>> watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 221s! [rb_consumer:66]
>>> CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 66 Comm: rb_consumer Not tainted 6.16.0+ #259 PREEMPT(none)
>>> Call Trace:
>>> <IRQ>
>>> __netdev_alloc_skb+0x2e/0x3a0
>>> br_ip6_multicast_alloc_query+0x212/0x1b70
>>> __br_multicast_send_query+0x376/0xac0
>>> br_multicast_send_query+0x299/0x510
>>> br_multicast_query_expired.constprop.0+0x16d/0x1b0
>>> call_timer_fn+0x3b/0x2a0
>>> __run_timers+0x619/0x950
>>> run_timer_softirq+0x11c/0x220
>>> handle_softirqs+0x18e/0x560
>>> __irq_exit_rcu+0x158/0x1a0
>>> sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x76/0x90
>>> </IRQ>
>>>
>>> This issue can be reproduced with:
>>> ip link add br0 type bridge
>>> echo 1 > /sys/class/net/br0/bridge/multicast_querier
>>> echo 0xffffffffffffffff >
>>> /sys/class/net/br0/bridge/multicast_query_interval
>>> ip link set dev br0 up
>>>
>>> Fix this by comparing expire time with jiffies, to avoid the timer loop.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 7e4df51eb35d ("bridge: netlink: add support for igmp's intervals")
>>> Signed-off-by: Wang Liang <wangliang74@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> net/bridge/br_multicast.c | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
>>> index 1377f31b719c..631ae3b4c45d 100644
>>> --- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
>>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
>>> @@ -1892,7 +1892,8 @@ static void br_multicast_send_query(struct net_bridge_mcast *brmctx,
>>> time += own_query->startup_sent < brmctx->multicast_startup_query_count ?
>>> brmctx->multicast_startup_query_interval :
>>> brmctx->multicast_query_interval;
>>> - mod_timer(&own_query->timer, time);
>>> + if (time_is_after_jiffies(time))
>>> + mod_timer(&own_query->timer, time);
>>> }
>>> static void
>> This is the wrong way to fix it, it is a configuration issue, so we could either
>> cap the value at something that noone uses, e.g. 24 hours, or we could make sure time
>> is at least 1s (that is BR_MULTICAST_QUERY_INTVL_MIN).
>>
>> The simple fix would be to do a min(time, BR_MULTICAST_QUERY_INTVL_MIN), but I'd go
>> for something similar to:
>> commit 99b40610956a
>> Author: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
>> Date: Mon Dec 27 19:21:15 2021 +0200
>>
>> net: bridge: mcast: add and enforce query interval minimum
>>
>> for the maximum to avoid the overflow altogether. By the way multicast_startup_query_interval
>> would also cause the same issue, so you'd have to cap it.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Nik
>
>
> Thanks very much for your suggestions!
>
> Similar to the commit 99b40610956a("net: bridge: mcast: add and enforce
> query interval minimum"), it is indeed a better choice to add query
> interval maximum:
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> index 1377f31b719c..8ce145938b02 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> @@ -4818,6 +4818,14 @@ void br_multicast_set_query_intvl(struct net_bridge_mcast *brmctx,
> intvl_jiffies = BR_MULTICAST_QUERY_INTVL_MIN;
> }
>
> + if (intvl_jiffies > BR_MULTICAST_QUERY_INTVL_MAX) {
> + br_info(brmctx->br,
> + "trying to set multicast query interval above maximum, setting to %lu (%ums)\n",
> + jiffies_to_clock_t(BR_MULTICAST_QUERY_INTVL_MAX),
> + jiffies_to_msecs(BR_MULTICAST_QUERY_INTVL_MAX));
> + intvl_jiffies = BR_MULTICAST_QUERY_INTVL_MAX;
> + }
> +
> brmctx->multicast_query_interval = intvl_jiffies;
> }
>
> @@ -4834,6 +4842,14 @@ void br_multicast_set_startup_query_intvl(struct net_bridge_mcast *brmctx,
> intvl_jiffies = BR_MULTICAST_STARTUP_QUERY_INTVL_MIN;
> }
>
> + if (intvl_jiffies > BR_MULTICAST_STARTUP_QUERY_INTVL_MAX) {
> + br_info(brmctx->br,
> + "trying to set multicast startup query interval above maximum, setting to %lu (%ums)\n",
> + jiffies_to_clock_t(BR_MULTICAST_STARTUP_QUERY_INTVL_MAX),
> + jiffies_to_msecs(BR_MULTICAST_STARTUP_QUERY_INTVL_MAX));
> + intvl_jiffies = BR_MULTICAST_STARTUP_QUERY_INTVL_MAX;
> + }
> +
> brmctx->multicast_startup_query_interval = intvl_jiffies;
> }
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> index b159aae594c0..8de0904b9627 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@
> #define BR_MULTICAST_DEFAULT_HASH_MAX 4096
> #define BR_MULTICAST_QUERY_INTVL_MIN msecs_to_jiffies(1000)
> #define BR_MULTICAST_STARTUP_QUERY_INTVL_MIN BR_MULTICAST_QUERY_INTVL_MIN
> +#define BR_MULTICAST_QUERY_INTVL_MAX msecs_to_jiffies(86400000) /* 24 hours */
> +#define BR_MULTICAST_STARTUP_QUERY_INTVL_MAX BR_MULTICAST_QUERY_INTVL_MAX
>
> #define BR_HWDOM_MAX BITS_PER_LONG
>
> Set the interval maximum to 24 hours, it is big enough.
> Please check it. If the above code is ok, I will send a v2 patch then.
>
> ------
> Best regards
> Wang Liang
>
yeah, that is what I suggested, looks good to me
Cheers,
Nik
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-10 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-06 9:49 Wang Liang
2025-08-06 10:08 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-08-07 10:36 ` Wang Liang
2025-08-10 10:02 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d5d95e23-8b1e-4b18-bf15-b627d4193684@blackwall.org \
--to=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=wangliang74@huawei.com \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangchangzhong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®