Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] brcmfmac: Support 89459 pcie

[Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1300 bytes --]

On 1/2/2023 10:45 AM, Aditya Garg wrote:
> Hi Hector
> 
>>
>> Is the CYW89459 just a rebrand of the BCM4355, or just a subset? If it
>> is a rebrand, it's okay if we call our Apple firmware
>> brcmfmac89459-pcie* (note that we use per-board firmware names, so it
>> wouldn't conflict with a generic one). However, if CYW89459 only refers
>> to specific variants, I think the firmware should be named after the
>> overall bcm4355 family.
>>
>> I'm guessing you intend to ship firmware for this. Would that firmware
>> work for all 4355 variants, or only the CYW one? If only the CYW one, is
>> it possible to differentiate between them based on PCI revision ID? Note
>> that our 4355 has revision ID 12, and Apple specifically calls it 4355C1
>> (different chip revisions have different firmware builds, which is why I
>> named our firmware brcmfmac4355c1-pcie). If the CYW variant uses other
>> revision IDs that do not overlap, maybe we should have different
>> firmware entries for them with different masks.
> 
> 
> Can we make a separate table for the OTP Apple chips, something like here :-
> 
> https://github.com/AdityaGarg8/linux/commit/fc41aac9283d2ba653a8b3191e8c0138c13d8ee1

I do not understand from this email thread why you would need separate 
tables. Can you explain?

Regards,
Arend

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4219 bytes --]