mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Hongliang Yang <hongliang.yang@cixtech.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Peter Chen <peter.chen@kernel.org>,
	Pawel Laszczak <pawell@cadence.com>,
	Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cix-kernel-upstream@cixtech.com,
	Gary Yang <gary.yang@cixtech.com>,
	Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@cixtech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] dt-bindings: usb: Add CIX Sky1 USBSSP controller
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 08:39:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <91d67c5d-d125-4834-b0c4-742951c59af8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106072849.985274-1-hongliang.yang@cixtech.com>

On 06/11/2026 08:28, Hongliang Yang wrote:
> On 06/11/2026 08:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> So instead of replying under each comment, you selected a few of them
>> and expect me to map/figure out which ones you ignored?
> 
> No. Compressing eight separate comments into one mail was the wrong way
> to answer a review, and it is what made you match numbered paragraphs to
> quotes yourself. I will answer under the individual messages instead.
> 
>> OK, then find me where did you reply to this:
>>
>> "And do not combine USB patches with other subsystems."
>>
>> "I do not see how you addressed my feedback from v1. I asked, not to
>> combine USB patches with other subsystems, within one patchset. These
>> are separate patchsets."
> 
> The first one, in the v1 thread:
> 
>   https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260902032306.1182941-1-hongliang.yang@cixtech.com/
> 
> where I wrote "Done in v2: the combined bindings patch is split into
> separate patches with dt-bindings: phy: and dt-bindings: usb: subject
> prefixes, one schema per patch". That answer was only half true: v2
> split the bindings into separate patches, but the PHY and the USB series
> were still submitted together. The series were actually split in v4, and
> have been separate since:
> 
>   [PATCH v4 0/3] Add CIX Sky1 USB3 PHY support
>     <20260906032431.470744-1-hongliang.yang@cixtech.com>
>   [PATCH v4 0/4] Add CIX Sky1 USBSSP controller support
>     <20260906032440.470788-1-hongliang.yang@cixtech.com>
> 
> The second one, on the v3 cover (6ca4ba08): I did not reply to it. The
> split went into v4 with no mail saying so. There is no reply I can point
> you to for that message, and I am not going to claim there is.
> 
> What remains are the per-patch comments on the binding that my previous
> mail answered in summary form. I will reply to those under your original
> messages, one at a time, rather than restate them here.

You still combine USB with other subsystem. Identify subsystems here,
please.
1. USB
2. SoC, no?

DTS cannot be placed here.


Best regards,
Krzysztof

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-06  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-05  1:18 [PATCH v6 0/3] usb: cdns3: Add CIX Sky1 USBSSP controller support Hongliang Yang (杨宏亮)
2026-11-05  1:18 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] dt-bindings: usb: Add CIX Sky1 USBSSP controller Hongliang Yang (杨宏亮)
2026-11-05  7:49   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-06  5:50     ` Hongliang Yang
2026-11-06  7:01       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-06  7:28         ` Hongliang Yang
2026-11-06  7:39           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2026-11-06  8:17             ` Hongliang Yang
2026-11-05  1:18 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] usb: cdns3: Add CIX Sky1 glue driver Hongliang Yang (杨宏亮)
2026-11-05  1:18 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] arm64: dts: cix: Add USB4/USB5 nodes for Sky1 Hongliang Yang (杨宏亮)
2026-11-05  7:48   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-06  5:50     ` Hongliang Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=91d67c5d-d125-4834-b0c4-742951c59af8@kernel.org \
    --to=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=cix-kernel-upstream@cixtech.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=fugang.duan@cixtech.com \
    --cc=gary.yang@cixtech.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hongliang.yang@cixtech.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=pawell@cadence.com \
    --cc=peter.chen@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=rogerq@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®