From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Abinash Singh <abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com>, bvanassche@acm.org
Cc: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
martin.petersen@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/3] scsi: sd: make sd_revalidate_disk() return void
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 10:58:13 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <91f0fb20-1313-47c6-b40f-65520cd8c85b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250824180218.39498-4-abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com>
On 8/25/25 3:02 AM, Abinash Singh wrote:
> The sd_revalidate_disk() function currently returns 0 for
> both success and memory allocation failure.Since none of its
> callers use the return value, this return code is both unnecessary
> and potentially misleading.
>
> Change the return type of sd_revalidate_disk() from int to void
> and remove all return value handling. This makes the function
> semantics clearer and avoids confusion about unused return codes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abinash Singh <abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/sd.c | 11 +++++------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index 35856685d7fa..b3926c43e700 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static void sd_config_discard(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct queue_limits *lim,
> unsigned int mode);
> static void sd_config_write_same(struct scsi_disk *sdkp,
> struct queue_limits *lim);
> -static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *);
> +static void sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *);
> static void sd_unlock_native_capacity(struct gendisk *disk);
> static void sd_shutdown(struct device *);
> static void scsi_disk_release(struct device *cdev);
> @@ -3691,7 +3691,7 @@ static void sd_read_block_zero(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
> * performs disk spin up, read_capacity, etc.
> * @disk: struct gendisk we care about
> **/
> -static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
> +static void sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
> {
> struct scsi_disk *sdkp = scsi_disk(disk);
> struct scsi_device *sdp = sdkp->device;
> @@ -3699,7 +3699,7 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
> struct queue_limits *lim = NULL;
> unsigned char *buffer = NULL;
> unsigned int dev_max;
> - int err = 0;
> + int err;
>
> SCSI_LOG_HLQUEUE(3, sd_printk(KERN_INFO, sdkp,
> "sd_revalidate_disk\n"));
> @@ -3709,11 +3709,11 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
> * of the other niceties.
> */
> if (!scsi_device_online(sdp))
> - goto out;
> + return;
>
> lim = kmalloc(sizeof(*lim), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!lim)
> - goto out;
> + return;
>
> buffer = kmalloc(SD_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!buffer)
OK. So you can ignore the nit I commented on patch 1.
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> @@ -3823,7 +3823,6 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
> kfree(buffer);
> kfree(lim);
>
> - return err;
> }
>
> /**
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-25 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-24 18:02 [PATCH v9 0/3] scsi: sd: Cleanups and warning fixes in sd_revalidate_disk() Abinash Singh
2025-08-24 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 1/3] scsi: sd: Remove redundant printk after kmalloc failure Abinash Singh
2025-08-25 1:56 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-24 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] scsi: sd: Fix build warning in sd_revalidate_disk() Abinash Singh
2025-08-25 1:53 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-24 18:02 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] scsi: sd: make sd_revalidate_disk() return void Abinash Singh
2025-08-25 1:58 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=91f0fb20-1313-47c6-b40f-65520cd8c85b@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®