From: Mukesh R <mrathor@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>,
"linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "kys@microsoft.com" <kys@microsoft.com>,
"wei.liu@kernel.org" <wei.liu@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/3] mshv: Rename memory deposit memory functions to _old
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 13:43:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <921a1646-4257-c627-1019-8ac41ea89ed4@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR02MB4157D9294688C8E5F21BDD19D4B12@SN6PR02MB4157.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
On 9/8/26 11:01, Michael Kelley wrote:
> From: Mukesh R <mrathor@linux.microsoft.com> Sent: Monday, September 7, 2026 7:14 PM
>>
>> Rename hv_call_deposit_pages() and hv_deposit_memory_node() to _old
>> to make reviewing the new functions much easier.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mukesh R <mrathor@linux.microsoft.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hv/hv_proc.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv_proc.c b/drivers/hv/hv_proc.c
>> index 57b2c64197cb..57864bb5bcd8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hv/hv_proc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hv/hv_proc.c
>> @@ -13,10 +13,10 @@
>> * See struct hv_deposit_memory. The first u64 is partition ID, the rest
>> * are GPAs.
>> */
>> -#define HV_DEPOSIT_MAX (HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(u64) - 1)
>> +#define HV_DEPOSIT_MAX_OLD (HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(u64) - 1)
>>
>> /* Deposits exact number of pages. Must be called with interrupts enabled. */
>> -int hv_call_deposit_pages(int node, u64 partition_id, u32 num_pages)
>> +static int hv_call_deposit_pages_old(int node, u64 partition_id, u32 num_pages)
>> {
>> struct page **pages, *page;
>> int *counts;
>> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ int hv_call_deposit_pages(int node, u64 partition_id, u32 num_pages)
>> struct hv_deposit_memory *input_page;
>> unsigned long flags;
>>
>> - if (num_pages > HV_DEPOSIT_MAX)
>> + if (num_pages > HV_DEPOSIT_MAX_OLD)
>> return -E2BIG;
>> if (!num_pages)
>> return 0;
>> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ int hv_call_deposit_pages(int node, u64 partition_id, u32 num_pages)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> pages = page_address(page);
>>
>> - counts = kzalloc_objs(int, HV_DEPOSIT_MAX);
>> + counts = kzalloc_objs(int, HV_DEPOSIT_MAX_OLD);
>> if (!counts) {
>> free_page((unsigned long)pages);
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> @@ -108,10 +108,14 @@ int hv_call_deposit_pages(int node, u64 partition_id, u32 num_pages)
>> kfree(counts);
>> return ret;
>> }
>> +
>> +int hv_call_deposit_pages(int node, u64 partition_id, u32 num_pages)
>> +{
>> + return hv_call_deposit_pages_old(node, partition_id, num_pages);
>> +}
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hv_call_deposit_pages);
>>
>> -int hv_deposit_memory_node(int node, u64 partition_id,
>> - u64 hv_status)
>> +static int __maybe_unused hv_deposit_memory_node_old(int node, u64 partition_id, u64 hv_status)
>
> I'm not clear on why there is "__maybe_unused" here. If CONFIG_MSHV_ROOT
> isn't defined, this whole file isn't built.
The main 2nd patch adds newer version of the function, so this _old is
not called anymore, and will generate compiler warning.
Thanks,
-Mukesh
> But it doesn't really matter since Patch 3 of the series deletes the code anyway.
>
>> {
>> u32 num_pages = 1;
>>
>> @@ -137,7 +141,12 @@ int hv_deposit_memory_node(int node, u64 partition_id,
>> hv_status_err(hv_status, "Unexpected!\n");
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> }
>> - return hv_call_deposit_pages(node, partition_id, num_pages);
>> + return hv_call_deposit_pages_old(node, partition_id, num_pages);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int hv_deposit_memory_node(int node, u64 partition_id, u64 hv_status)
>> +{
>> + return hv_deposit_memory_node_old(node, partition_id, hv_status);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hv_deposit_memory_node);
>>
>> --
>> 2.51.2.vfs.0.1
>>
>
> The "__maybe_unused" notwithstanding,
>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 2:13 [PATCH V1 0/3] Redesign memory deposit logic Mukesh R
2026-09-08 2:13 ` [PATCH V1 1/3] mshv: Rename memory deposit memory functions to _old Mukesh R
2026-09-08 18:01 ` Michael Kelley
2026-09-08 20:43 ` Mukesh R [this message]
2026-09-08 21:31 ` Michael Kelley
2026-09-08 2:13 ` [PATCH V1 2/3] mshv: Redesign hypervisor memory deposit logic Mukesh R
2026-09-08 18:02 ` Michael Kelley
2026-09-08 22:32 ` Mukesh R
2026-09-09 17:32 ` Michael Kelley
2026-09-09 18:22 ` Mukesh R
2026-09-08 2:13 ` [PATCH V1 3/3] mshv: Remove unused *_old memory deposit functions Mukesh R
2026-09-08 18:03 ` Michael Kelley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=921a1646-4257-c627-1019-8ac41ea89ed4@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=mrathor@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®