mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>, NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
	Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+54cdc566f64abf51b7f1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] SUNRPC: Reject a socket that already has an svc_sock attached
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 09:06:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9223c486ff90585a56556d810901c2cbcec85bae.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260815162844.8219-1-cel@kernel.org>

On Sat, 2026-08-15 at 12:28 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Writing the same socket descriptor to /proc/fs/nfsd/portlist twice
> attaches a second svc_sock to one socket. svc_setup_socket() saves
> the socket's callbacks before installing its own, so the second
> attach records svc_write_space() as the old write_space callback.
> svc_udp_init() invokes that callback by way of svc_sock_setbufsize(),
> and svc_write_space() then calls itself until the kernel stack is
> exhausted:
> 
>   BUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at ffffc900037d7ff8
>    svc_write_space+0x90/0x2b0 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:429
>    svc_write_space+0xe6/0x2b0 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:430
>    ... 700 more ...
>    svc_sock_setbufsize+0x18d/0x220 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:386
>    svc_udp_init net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:854 [inline]
>    svc_setup_socket+0xb2f/0x1090 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:1498
>    svc_addsock+0x2fd/0x760 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:1547
>    __write_ports_addfd fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c:742 [inline]
>    write_ports+0xa5b/0xcc0 fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c:861
>    nfsctl_transaction_write+0x106/0x1a0 fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c:112
> 
> svc_data_ready() and svc_tcp_state_change() chain through their saved
> callbacks the same way, so a TCP descriptor added twice recurses on
> the next incoming segment instead. Reaching any of this takes a
> writer on portlist, and the nfsd filesystem sets no FS_USERNS_MOUNT,
> so the reproducer needs CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the initial user namespace.
> 
> Reject a socket that already carries sk_user_data. svc_setup_socket()
> overwrites that field unconditionally, so a socket some other
> consumer has claimed is one NFSD would corrupt whether or not the
> callbacks recurse.
> 
> Fixes: b41b66d63c73 ("[PATCH] knfsd: allow sockets to be passed to nfsd via 'portlist'")
> Reported-by: syzbot+54cdc566f64abf51b7f1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=54cdc566f64abf51b7f1
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
> ---
>  net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> index 7a423e9ee74d..5a2d52284d75 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> @@ -1614,6 +1614,9 @@ int svc_addsock(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net, const int fd,
>  	err = -EISCONN;
>  	if (so->state > SS_UNCONNECTED)
>  		goto out;
> +	err = -EBUSY;
> +	if (so->sk->sk_user_data)
> +		goto out;
>  	err = -ENOENT;
>  	if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE))
>  		goto out;

Nice catch!

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

Claude had some pedantry about the changelog though. Regurgitated
verbatim here:

> svc_data_ready() and svc_tcp_state_change() chain through their saved
> callbacks the same way, so a TCP descriptor added twice recurses on
> the next incoming segment instead.

Are those the two callbacks that recurse for tcp?

The write_ports kerneldoc says "listen(3) must be called for a
SOCK_STREAM socket", and for a listening socket svc_tcp_init() only
replaces sk_data_ready:

net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:svc_tcp_init() {
	...
	if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
		strcpy(svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_remotebuf, "listener");
		set_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
		set_bit(XPT_RPCB_UNREG, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
		sk->sk_data_ready = svc_tcp_listen_data_ready;
		set_bit(XPT_CONN, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
	} else {
		sk->sk_state_change = svc_tcp_state_change;
		sk->sk_data_ready = svc_data_ready;
		sk->sk_write_space = svc_write_space;
	...
}

sk_state_change and sk_write_space are left alone on a listener, so the
second svc_setup_socket() saves svc_tcp_listen_data_ready() into
sk_odata and the recursion runs there instead:

net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:svc_tcp_listen_data_ready() {
	struct svc_sock	*svsk = (struct svc_sock *)sk-
>sk_user_data;
	...
	if (svsk) {
		/* Refer to svc_setup_socket() for details. */
		rmb();
		svsk->sk_odata(sk);
	...
}

The else branch does install svc_data_ready() and
svc_tcp_state_change(), but svc_addsock() only reaches it for a
descriptor that is not listening, and svc_tcp_init() then closes that
transport right away:

net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:svc_tcp_init() {
	...
		switch (sk->sk_state) {
		case TCP_SYN_RECV:
		case TCP_ESTABLISHED:
			break;
		default:
			svc_xprt_deferred_close(&svsk->sk_xprt);
		}
	...
}

Should the paragraph name svc_tcp_listen_data_ready() instead?


      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-17 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-15 16:28 Chuck Lever
2026-08-17 13:06 ` Jeff Layton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9223c486ff90585a56556d810901c2cbcec85bae.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
    --cc=syzbot+54cdc566f64abf51b7f1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®