* [PATCH v1] SUNRPC: Reject a socket that already has an svc_sock attached
@ 2026-08-15 16:28 Chuck Lever
2026-08-17 13:06 ` Jeff Layton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Lever @ 2026-08-15 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: NeilBrown, Jeff Layton, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey
Cc: linux-nfs, linux-kernel, netdev, syzbot+54cdc566f64abf51b7f1
Writing the same socket descriptor to /proc/fs/nfsd/portlist twice
attaches a second svc_sock to one socket. svc_setup_socket() saves
the socket's callbacks before installing its own, so the second
attach records svc_write_space() as the old write_space callback.
svc_udp_init() invokes that callback by way of svc_sock_setbufsize(),
and svc_write_space() then calls itself until the kernel stack is
exhausted:
BUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at ffffc900037d7ff8
svc_write_space+0x90/0x2b0 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:429
svc_write_space+0xe6/0x2b0 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:430
... 700 more ...
svc_sock_setbufsize+0x18d/0x220 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:386
svc_udp_init net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:854 [inline]
svc_setup_socket+0xb2f/0x1090 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:1498
svc_addsock+0x2fd/0x760 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:1547
__write_ports_addfd fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c:742 [inline]
write_ports+0xa5b/0xcc0 fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c:861
nfsctl_transaction_write+0x106/0x1a0 fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c:112
svc_data_ready() and svc_tcp_state_change() chain through their saved
callbacks the same way, so a TCP descriptor added twice recurses on
the next incoming segment instead. Reaching any of this takes a
writer on portlist, and the nfsd filesystem sets no FS_USERNS_MOUNT,
so the reproducer needs CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the initial user namespace.
Reject a socket that already carries sk_user_data. svc_setup_socket()
overwrites that field unconditionally, so a socket some other
consumer has claimed is one NFSD would corrupt whether or not the
callbacks recurse.
Fixes: b41b66d63c73 ("[PATCH] knfsd: allow sockets to be passed to nfsd via 'portlist'")
Reported-by: syzbot+54cdc566f64abf51b7f1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=54cdc566f64abf51b7f1
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
---
net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
index 7a423e9ee74d..5a2d52284d75 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@ -1614,6 +1614,9 @@ int svc_addsock(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net, const int fd,
err = -EISCONN;
if (so->state > SS_UNCONNECTED)
goto out;
+ err = -EBUSY;
+ if (so->sk->sk_user_data)
+ goto out;
err = -ENOENT;
if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE))
goto out;
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] SUNRPC: Reject a socket that already has an svc_sock attached
2026-08-15 16:28 [PATCH v1] SUNRPC: Reject a socket that already has an svc_sock attached Chuck Lever
@ 2026-08-17 13:06 ` Jeff Layton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Layton @ 2026-08-17 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chuck Lever, NeilBrown, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey
Cc: linux-nfs, linux-kernel, netdev, syzbot+54cdc566f64abf51b7f1
On Sat, 2026-08-15 at 12:28 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Writing the same socket descriptor to /proc/fs/nfsd/portlist twice
> attaches a second svc_sock to one socket. svc_setup_socket() saves
> the socket's callbacks before installing its own, so the second
> attach records svc_write_space() as the old write_space callback.
> svc_udp_init() invokes that callback by way of svc_sock_setbufsize(),
> and svc_write_space() then calls itself until the kernel stack is
> exhausted:
>
> BUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at ffffc900037d7ff8
> svc_write_space+0x90/0x2b0 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:429
> svc_write_space+0xe6/0x2b0 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:430
> ... 700 more ...
> svc_sock_setbufsize+0x18d/0x220 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:386
> svc_udp_init net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:854 [inline]
> svc_setup_socket+0xb2f/0x1090 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:1498
> svc_addsock+0x2fd/0x760 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:1547
> __write_ports_addfd fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c:742 [inline]
> write_ports+0xa5b/0xcc0 fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c:861
> nfsctl_transaction_write+0x106/0x1a0 fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c:112
>
> svc_data_ready() and svc_tcp_state_change() chain through their saved
> callbacks the same way, so a TCP descriptor added twice recurses on
> the next incoming segment instead. Reaching any of this takes a
> writer on portlist, and the nfsd filesystem sets no FS_USERNS_MOUNT,
> so the reproducer needs CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the initial user namespace.
>
> Reject a socket that already carries sk_user_data. svc_setup_socket()
> overwrites that field unconditionally, so a socket some other
> consumer has claimed is one NFSD would corrupt whether or not the
> callbacks recurse.
>
> Fixes: b41b66d63c73 ("[PATCH] knfsd: allow sockets to be passed to nfsd via 'portlist'")
> Reported-by: syzbot+54cdc566f64abf51b7f1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=54cdc566f64abf51b7f1
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
> ---
> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> index 7a423e9ee74d..5a2d52284d75 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> @@ -1614,6 +1614,9 @@ int svc_addsock(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net, const int fd,
> err = -EISCONN;
> if (so->state > SS_UNCONNECTED)
> goto out;
> + err = -EBUSY;
> + if (so->sk->sk_user_data)
> + goto out;
> err = -ENOENT;
> if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE))
> goto out;
Nice catch!
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Claude had some pedantry about the changelog though. Regurgitated
verbatim here:
> svc_data_ready() and svc_tcp_state_change() chain through their saved
> callbacks the same way, so a TCP descriptor added twice recurses on
> the next incoming segment instead.
Are those the two callbacks that recurse for tcp?
The write_ports kerneldoc says "listen(3) must be called for a
SOCK_STREAM socket", and for a listening socket svc_tcp_init() only
replaces sk_data_ready:
net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:svc_tcp_init() {
...
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
strcpy(svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_remotebuf, "listener");
set_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
set_bit(XPT_RPCB_UNREG, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
sk->sk_data_ready = svc_tcp_listen_data_ready;
set_bit(XPT_CONN, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
} else {
sk->sk_state_change = svc_tcp_state_change;
sk->sk_data_ready = svc_data_ready;
sk->sk_write_space = svc_write_space;
...
}
sk_state_change and sk_write_space are left alone on a listener, so the
second svc_setup_socket() saves svc_tcp_listen_data_ready() into
sk_odata and the recursion runs there instead:
net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:svc_tcp_listen_data_ready() {
struct svc_sock *svsk = (struct svc_sock *)sk-
>sk_user_data;
...
if (svsk) {
/* Refer to svc_setup_socket() for details. */
rmb();
svsk->sk_odata(sk);
...
}
The else branch does install svc_data_ready() and
svc_tcp_state_change(), but svc_addsock() only reaches it for a
descriptor that is not listening, and svc_tcp_init() then closes that
transport right away:
net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:svc_tcp_init() {
...
switch (sk->sk_state) {
case TCP_SYN_RECV:
case TCP_ESTABLISHED:
break;
default:
svc_xprt_deferred_close(&svsk->sk_xprt);
}
...
}
Should the paragraph name svc_tcp_listen_data_ready() instead?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-17 13:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-15 16:28 [PATCH v1] SUNRPC: Reject a socket that already has an svc_sock attached Chuck Lever
2026-08-17 13:06 ` Jeff Layton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®