* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.269-rc1 review
2026-08-31 13:35 [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.269-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2026-08-31 17:01 ` Florian Fainelli
2026-08-31 19:23 ` Brett A C Sheffield
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2026-08-31 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor,
hargar, broonie, achill, sr
On 8/31/2026 6:35 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.269 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 02 Sep 2026 13:32:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.269-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.269-rc1 review
2026-08-31 13:35 [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.269-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-08-31 17:01 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2026-08-31 19:23 ` Brett A C Sheffield
2026-08-31 20:58 ` Woody Suwalski
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Brett A C Sheffield @ 2026-08-31 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr,
Brett A C Sheffield
# Librecast Test Results
020/020 [ OK ] liblcrq
010/010 [ OK ] libmld
120/120 [ OK ] liblibrecast
CPU/kernel: Linux auntie 5.10.269-rc1-01407-ga5b83a2b4fcc #1 SMP Mon Aug 31 19:17:25 -00 2026 x86_64 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
Tested-by: Brett A C Sheffield <bacs@librecast.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.269-rc1 review
2026-08-31 13:35 [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.269-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-08-31 17:01 ` Florian Fainelli
2026-08-31 19:23 ` Brett A C Sheffield
@ 2026-08-31 20:58 ` Woody Suwalski
2026-09-01 2:00 ` Dominique Martinet
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Woody Suwalski @ 2026-08-31 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.269 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Compiled an i386 kernel, installed and booted OK on a 32-bit EeePC.
No problems noticed.
Tested-by: Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@gmail.com>
PS. Should the 5.10.269 patch include the fix from pchelkin@ispras.ru
[PATCH 5.10] Revert "USB: serial: keyspan_pda: fix information leak" ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.269-rc1 review
2026-08-31 13:35 [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.269-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-08-31 20:58 ` Woody Suwalski
@ 2026-09-01 2:00 ` Dominique Martinet
2026-09-01 8:45 ` Pavel Machek
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dominique Martinet @ 2026-09-01 2:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 03:35:08PM +0200:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.269 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 02 Sep 2026 13:32:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.269-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
Tested a5b83a2b4fcc ("Linux 5.10.269-rc1") on:
- arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640)
- arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4)
- arm64 i.MX8ULP (Armadillo IoT A9E)
No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests:
Tested-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com>
--
Dominique Martinet
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.269-rc1 review
2026-08-31 13:35 [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.269-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2026-09-01 2:00 ` Dominique Martinet
@ 2026-09-01 8:45 ` Pavel Machek
2026-09-01 16:48 ` Shuah Khan
2026-09-02 0:11 ` Barry K. Nathan
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2026-09-01 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 504 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.269 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@nabladev.com>
Best regards,
Pavel
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.269-rc1 review
2026-08-31 13:35 [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.269-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2026-09-01 8:45 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2026-09-01 16:48 ` Shuah Khan
2026-09-02 0:11 ` Barry K. Nathan
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2026-09-01 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr, Shuah Khan
On 8/31/26 07:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.269 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 02 Sep 2026 13:32:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.269-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled on my test system. No build regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.269-rc1 review
2026-08-31 13:35 [PATCH 5.10 00/43] 5.10.269-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2026-09-01 16:48 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2026-09-02 0:11 ` Barry K. Nathan
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Barry K. Nathan @ 2026-09-02 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, achill, sr
On 8/31/26 6:35 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.269 release.
> There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 02 Sep 2026 13:32:19 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.269-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Tested on an amd64 laptop (Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 1). Working well,
no regressions observed.
Tested-by: Barry K. Nathan <barryn@pobox.com>
--
-Barry K. Nathan <barryn@pobox.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread