From: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
To: "Hui Peng" <benquike@gmail.com>,
"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
"Guopeng Zhang" <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] cgroup/cpuset: prevent activating local partition over remote one
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 09:40:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93e48fe3-d229-4870-af8a-32431d236211@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924042729.1908863-3-benquike@gmail.com>
On 9/24/2026 12:27 PM, Hui Peng wrote:
> Commit 6da580ec656a ("cgroup/cpuset: Don't allow creation of local
> partition over a remote one") added a check in update_prstate() to reject
> creating a top-level local partition whose cs->exclusive_cpus intersects
> subpartitions_cpus.
>
> However, if a top-level cgroup A1 has a child A1/A2 enabled as a remote
> partition on a subset of its exclusive CPUs (X2-3 on A1, CX2-3:P2 on
> A1/A2), and A1 is then set to "root" (P1, becoming "root invalid" via
> update_prstate() because its exclusive CPUs intersect subpartitions_cpus)
> followed by expanding its CPUs to include additional non-remote CPUs
> (CX1-3), update_cpumask() / update_exclusive_cpumask() calls
> validate_partition() without going through update_prstate(). Because
> validate_partition() does not check trialcs->exclusive_cpus against
> subpartitions_cpus, A1 transitions from "root invalid" to a valid local
> partition over the existing remote partition A1/A2 and triggers:
>
> WARNING: kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:1943 at update_parent_effective_cpumask+0x189b/0x1fd0
>
> Check trialcs->exclusive_cpus against subpartitions_cpus in
> validate_partition() when !is_partition_valid(cs), and add a regression
> test case to tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh.
>
Was this message assisted by an LLM?
It would be helpful if you could provide the reproducer as I replied earlier, so
that it can be understood more easily and tested.
> Tested in QEMU on Linux 7.3.0-rc3 using
> tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh.
>
> Fixes: 6da580ec656a ("cgroup/cpuset: Don't allow creation of local partition over a remote one")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 4 ++++
> tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 7381fa8502e7..7c5b4a8f1f3a 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -2415,6 +2415,10 @@ static enum prs_errcode validate_partition(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *tri
> if (cpumask_empty(trialcs->effective_xcpus))
> return PERR_INVCPUS;
>
> + if ((parent == &top_cpuset) && !is_partition_valid(cs) &&
> + cpumask_intersects(trialcs->exclusive_cpus, subpartitions_cpus))
> + return PERR_REMOTE;
> +
> if (prstate_housekeeping_conflict(trialcs->partition_root_state,
> trialcs->effective_xcpus))
> return PERR_HKEEPING;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> index b732078bf319..4a451350ad84 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> @@ -321,6 +321,8 @@ TEST_MATRIX=(
> " C1-3:P2 X4:P2 . . . X3:P2 . . 0 A1:1-2|XA1:1-3|A2:3:XA2:3 A1:P2|A2:P2 1-3"
> " C0-3:P2 . . C4-6 C0-4 . . . 0 A1:0-4|B1:5-6 A1:P2|B1:P0"
> " C0-3:P2 . . C4-6 C0-4:C0-3 . . . 0 A1:0-3|B1:4-6 A1:P2|B1:P0 0-3"
> + " X2-3 CX2-3:P2 . . P1:CX1-3 . . . 0 A1:1|A2:2-3|XA2:2-3 \
> + A1:P-1|A2:P2 2-3"
>
> # Local partition invalidation tests
> " C0-3:X1-3:P2 C1-3:X2-3:P2 C2-3:X3:P2 \
--
Best regards
Ridong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 4:27 [PATCH v4 0/3] cgroup/cpuset: fix exclusive CPU conflict checks for local and remote partitions Hui Peng
2026-09-24 4:27 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] cgroup/cpuset: return PERR_NOCPUS in remote_partition_enable() on subpartitions_cpus conflict Hui Peng
2026-09-25 19:22 ` Waiman Long
2026-09-26 19:11 ` Tejun Heo
2026-09-28 1:25 ` Ridong Chen
2026-09-24 4:27 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] cgroup/cpuset: prevent activating local partition over remote one Hui Peng
2026-09-27 1:45 ` Waiman Long
2026-09-28 1:40 ` Ridong Chen [this message]
2026-09-24 4:27 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] cgroup/cpuset: check sibling effective_xcpus in cpus_excl_conflict() Hui Peng
2026-09-27 23:44 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93e48fe3-d229-4870-af8a-32431d236211@linux.dev \
--to=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=benquike@gmail.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
--cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®