* per-process flags on x86
@ 2009-09-28 6:33 Dulloor
2009-09-29 2:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dulloor @ 2009-09-28 6:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
The flags field in task_struct is exhausted (for x86). Would it be
acceptable to add another flag (in the same cache line) ?
-dulloor
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: per-process flags on x86
2009-09-28 6:33 per-process flags on x86 Dulloor
@ 2009-09-29 2:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki @ 2009-09-29 2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dulloor; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:33:49 -0400
Dulloor <dulloor@gmail.com> wrote:
> The flags field in task_struct is exhausted (for x86). Would it be
> acceptable to add another flag (in the same cache line) ?
>
I think it depends on your purpose. talk-by-patch is maybe good.
Several people will have their own suggestion.
Thanks,
-Kame
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-29 2:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-28 6:33 per-process flags on x86 Dulloor
2009-09-29 2:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®