From: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
To: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: "Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Shuah Khan" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Guopeng Zhang" <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs: cgroup-v2: Describe effective CPUs of partition roots
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 16:11:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <95a81028-7ce7-4cc1-aacb-c74f11474639@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8ecbc327-cd54-439c-8493-78ceb11645bb@linux.dev>
在 2026/9/21 14:38, Ridong Chen 写道:
>
>
> On 9/18/2026 6:23 PM, Guopeng Zhang wrote:
>> From: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
>>
>> The cpuset.cpus.effective description says that the effective CPUs are
>> granted by the parent and are normally a subset of cpuset.cpus. This
>> does not always hold for a valid non-root partition root. Its effective
>> CPUs are the active CPUs in cpuset.cpus.exclusive.effective after CPUs
>> assigned to valid child partition roots are removed.
>>
>> If cpuset.cpus.exclusive differs from cpuset.cpus, the effective CPUs
>> may therefore be outside cpuset.cpus. Remote partitions also do not
>> necessarily get their CPUs from their immediate parent.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
>> ---
>> Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 29 ++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
>> index 272e9f2432bd..49ce8deb4115 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
>> @@ -2505,16 +2505,25 @@ Cpuset Interface Files
>> A read-only multiple values file which exists on all
>> cpuset-enabled cgroups.
>> - It lists the onlined CPUs that are actually granted to this
>> - cgroup by its parent. These CPUs are allowed to be used by
>> - tasks within the current cgroup.
>> -
>> - If "cpuset.cpus" is empty, the "cpuset.cpus.effective" file shows
>> - all the CPUs from the parent cgroup that can be available to
>> - be used by this cgroup. Otherwise, it should be a subset of
>> - "cpuset.cpus" unless none of the CPUs listed in "cpuset.cpus"
>> - can be granted. In this case, it will be treated just like an
>> - empty "cpuset.cpus".
>> + It lists the active CPUs available to tasks in this cgroup.
>> +
>> + For a cgroup that is not a valid partition root, an empty
>> + "cpuset.cpus" makes "cpuset.cpus.effective" show all CPUs
>> + available from the parent cgroup. Otherwise, it is a subset
>> + of "cpuset.cpus" unless none of the requested CPUs can be
>> + granted. In that case, it is treated like an empty
>> + "cpuset.cpus".
>> +
>> + For a valid non-root partition root, "cpuset.cpus.effective" contains
>> + the active CPUs from "cpuset.cpus.exclusive.effective" except
>> + those granted to valid child partition roots. If
>> + "cpuset.cpus.exclusive" is set to a value different from
>> + "cpuset.cpus", the effective CPUs need not be a subset of
>> + "cpuset.cpus". For example, if CPUs 2-5 are active,
>> + available, and not assigned to a valid child partition root,
>> + a partition root with "cpuset.cpus" set to "0-3" and
>> + "cpuset.cpus.exclusive" set to "2-5" has "2-5" in
>> + "cpuset.cpus.effective".
>> Its value will be affected by CPU hotplug events.
>>
>
> Hi Guopeng,
>
> Thank you for your effort.
>
> May I suggest adding a simple diagram to help clarify the relationship? Similarly, could you add a simple diagram to illustrate the relationship? Something like:
>
> ```
> A(cpu,memory) - B(memory) - C()
> \ D()
> ```
>
> I mean adding one diagram for the valid root case and another for the others (member / invalid root), so it becomes easier to see how they differ. What do you think?
>
Thanks for the suggestion. I agree that a simple diagram would make this easier to understand.
I'll add the diagrams in v2.
Thanks,
Guopeng
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 10:23 [PATCH 0/2] docs: cgroup-v2: Correct cpuset CPU descriptions Guopeng Zhang
2026-09-18 10:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] docs: cgroup-v2: Describe boot-isolated CPUs in cpuset.cpus.isolated Guopeng Zhang
2026-09-21 4:29 ` Ridong Chen
2026-09-21 8:09 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-09-18 10:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] docs: cgroup-v2: Describe effective CPUs of partition roots Guopeng Zhang
2026-09-21 6:38 ` Ridong Chen
2026-09-21 8:11 ` Guopeng Zhang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=95a81028-7ce7-4cc1-aacb-c74f11474639@linux.dev \
--to=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®