mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com>,
	 Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
	Xi Pardee <xi.pardee@linux.intel.com>,
	 platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/16] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Use fixed-size static pmc array
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 13:37:07 +0300 (EEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <96195b96-23eb-da7c-1437-39ed9ca6a151@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260522022147.4137494-11-david.e.box@linux.intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2715 bytes --]

On Thu, 21 May 2026, David E. Box wrote:

> From: Xi Pardee <xi.pardee@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Switch pmc_ssram_telems from a devm-allocated pointer to a fixed-size
> static array, eliminating per-probe allocation overhead and simplifying
> lifetime management.
> 
> Correspondingly simplify pmc_ssram_telemetry_get_pmc_info() validation to
> check devid availability and tighten input bounds checking. Drop
> null-pointer checks now that the storage is static.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xi Pardee <xi.pardee@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
> ---

Sashiko has noted some corner case issues related probe/init paths and 
missing cleanup which may have some merit, especially if this series makes 
the issue worse (for patches 10-14 but all those seem to fundamendally 
relate to same reprobe corner case and leaks of stale setups through 
static vars).

It has some false positives too, such as not realizing smp_*mb() implies 
a compiler barrier so those READ/WRITE_ONCE() requests look bogus to me.

-- 
 i.

> V5 - No changes
> 
> V4 - No changes
> 
> V3 - No changes
> 
> V2 changes:
>   - Replaced hardcoded array size [3] with MAX_NUM_PMC constant
> 
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c | 10 ++--------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c
> index 1deb4d71da3f..4bfe60ee55ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
>  
>  DEFINE_FREE(pmc_ssram_telemetry_iounmap, void __iomem *, if (_T) iounmap(_T))
>  
> -static struct pmc_ssram_telemetry *pmc_ssram_telems;
> +static struct pmc_ssram_telemetry pmc_ssram_telems[MAX_NUM_PMC];
>  static bool device_probed;
>  
>  static int
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ int pmc_ssram_telemetry_get_pmc_info(unsigned int pmc_idx,
>  	if (pmc_idx >= MAX_NUM_PMC)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (!pmc_ssram_telems || !pmc_ssram_telems[pmc_idx].devid)
> +	if (!pmc_ssram_telems[pmc_idx].devid)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	pmc_ssram_telemetry->devid = pmc_ssram_telems[pmc_idx].devid;
> @@ -153,12 +153,6 @@ static int pmc_ssram_telemetry_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const struct pci_de
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	pmc_ssram_telems = devm_kzalloc(&pcidev->dev, sizeof(*pmc_ssram_telems) * MAX_NUM_PMC,
> -					GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!pmc_ssram_telems) {
> -		ret = -ENOMEM;
> -		goto probe_finish;
> -	}
>  
>  	ret = pcim_enable_device(pcidev);
>  	if (ret) {
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-22 10:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-22  2:21 [PATCH v5 00/16] Add ACPI-based PMT discovery support for Intel PMC David E. Box
2026-05-22  2:21 ` [PATCH v5 01/16] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Add pre/post decode hooks around header parsing David E. Box
2026-05-22  2:21 ` [PATCH v5 02/16] platform/x86/intel/pmt/crashlog: Split init into pre-decode David E. Box
2026-05-22  2:21 ` [PATCH v5 03/16] platform/x86/intel/pmt/telemetry: Move overlap check to post-decode hook David E. Box
2026-05-22  2:21 ` [PATCH v5 04/16] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Pass discovery index instead of resource David E. Box
2026-05-22  2:21 ` [PATCH v5 05/16] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Cache the telemetry discovery header David E. Box
2026-05-22 10:08   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-05-22  2:21 ` [PATCH v5 06/16] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Unify header fetch and add ACPI source David E. Box
2026-05-22 10:21   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-05-28 18:37     ` David Box
2026-05-22  2:21 ` [PATCH v5 07/16] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Add PMC SSRAM Kconfig description David E. Box
2026-05-22  2:21 ` [PATCH v5 08/16] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Add ACPI PWRM telemetry driver for Nova Lake S David E. Box
2026-05-22  2:21 ` [PATCH v5 09/16] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Rename probe and PCI ID table for consistency David E. Box
2026-05-22  2:21 ` [PATCH v5 10/16] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Use fixed-size static pmc array David E. Box
2026-05-22 10:37   ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2026-05-22 19:49     ` David Box
2026-05-28 19:56       ` David Box
2026-05-22  2:21 ` [PATCH v5 11/16] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Refactor DEVID/PWRMBASE extraction into helper David E. Box
2026-05-22  2:21 ` [PATCH v5 12/16] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Add PCI platform data David E. Box
2026-05-22  2:21 ` [PATCH v5 13/16] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Refactor memory barrier for reentrant probe David E. Box
2026-05-29  2:39   ` David Box
2026-05-22  2:21 ` [PATCH v5 14/16] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Add ACPI discovery scaffolding David E. Box
2026-05-22  2:21 ` [PATCH v5 15/16] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Make PMT registration optional David E. Box
2026-05-22  2:21 ` [PATCH v5 16/16] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Add NVL PCI IDs for SSRAM telemetry discovery David E. Box
2026-05-22 10:07   ` Ilpo Järvinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=96195b96-23eb-da7c-1437-39ed9ca6a151@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hansg@kernel.org \
    --cc=irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=xi.pardee@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome