* Re: [PATCH] mm/filemap: Fix a typo in comment "unneccssary"->"unnecessary"
[not found] <20200411065141.15936-1-ethp@qq.com>
@ 2020-04-11 19:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-04-15 18:36 ` Ralph Campbell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2020-04-11 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ethon Paul; +Cc: akpm, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 02:51:41PM +0800, Ethon Paul wrote:
> @@ -1259,7 +1259,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(add_page_wait_queue);
> * instead.
> *
> * The read of PG_waiters has to be after (or concurrently with) PG_locked
> - * being cleared, but a memory barrier should be unneccssary since it is
> + * being cleared, but a memory barrier should be unnecessary since it is
> * in the same byte as PG_locked.
> */
> static inline bool clear_bit_unlock_is_negative_byte(long nr, volatile void *mem)
This will conflict with the patch series I sent here:
<20200326122429.20710-1-willy@infradead.org>
which deletes the entire comment.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mm/filemap: Fix a typo in comment "unneccssary"->"unnecessary"
[not found] <20200411065141.15936-1-ethp@qq.com>
2020-04-11 19:32 ` [PATCH] mm/filemap: Fix a typo in comment "unneccssary"->"unnecessary" Matthew Wilcox
@ 2020-04-15 18:36 ` Ralph Campbell
2020-04-15 18:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ralph Campbell @ 2020-04-15 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ethon Paul, akpm, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On 4/10/20 11:51 PM, Ethon Paul wrote:
> There is a typo in comment, fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ethon Paul <ethp@qq.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
> ---
> mm/filemap.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index 23a051a7ef0f..de6d01a519e4 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -1259,7 +1259,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(add_page_wait_queue);
> * instead.
> *
> * The read of PG_waiters has to be after (or concurrently with) PG_locked
> - * being cleared, but a memory barrier should be unneccssary since it is
> + * being cleared, but a memory barrier should be unnecessary since it is
> * in the same byte as PG_locked.
> */
> static inline bool clear_bit_unlock_is_negative_byte(long nr, volatile void *mem)
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread