Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/3] dt-bindings: net: dsa: yt921x: Add Motorcomm YT921x switch support

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 25/08/2025 04:39, Yangfl wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 2:09 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 24/08/2025 11:25, Yangfl wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 5:20 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 08:51:09AM +0800, David Yang wrote:
>>>>> The Motorcomm YT921x series is a family of Ethernet switches with up to
>>>>> 8 internal GbE PHYs and up to 2 GMACs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: David Yang <mmyangfl@gmail.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> <form letter>
>>>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>>>
>>>> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>>>>
>>>> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
>>>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
>>>> versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
>>>> patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
>>>> bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
>>>> on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
>>>> need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
>>>> will do that for tags received on the version they apply.
>>>>
>>>> Please read:
>>>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
>>>>
>>>> *If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why* and what changed.
>>>> </form letter>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>>  - use enum for reg in dt binding
>>>
>>> I made a change in dt binding. If you are fine with that change, I'll
>>> add the tag in the following versions (if any).
>>
>>
>> Cover letter must state the reason.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
> 
> as requested in the previous version
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/f76df98e-f743-4dc2-9f10-93b97f69addb@lunn.ch

Hm? Where is there a statement that you remove review because of this
and that?


Best regards,
Krzysztof