From: wen.yang@linux.dev
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-rt-devel@list.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 03/15] net: napi_schedule_rps() cleanup
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 01:58:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9703e2ac1d47f48775c312a6fc54cb3f874142f6.1791912669.git.wen.yang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1791912669.git.wen.yang@linux.dev>
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
napi_schedule_rps() return value is ignored, remove it.
commit 8fcb76b934daff12cde76adeab3d502eeb0734b1 upstream.
Change the comment to clarify the intent.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>
---
net/core/dev.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index efe483d7e03f..36dbb86496ec 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4722,11 +4722,18 @@ static void trigger_rx_softirq(void *data)
}
/*
- * Check if this softnet_data structure is another cpu one
- * If yes, queue it to our IPI list and return 1
- * If no, return 0
+ * After we queued a packet into sd->input_pkt_queue,
+ * we need to make sure this queue is serviced soon.
+ *
+ * - If this is another cpu queue, link it to our rps_ipi_list,
+ * and make sure we will process rps_ipi_list from net_rx_action().
+ * As we do not know yet if we are called from net_rx_action(),
+ * we have to raise NET_RX_SOFTIRQ. This might change in the future.
+ *
+ * - If this is our own queue, NAPI schedule our backlog.
+ * Note that this also raises NET_RX_SOFTIRQ.
*/
-static int napi_schedule_rps(struct softnet_data *sd)
+static void napi_schedule_rps(struct softnet_data *sd)
{
struct softnet_data *mysd = this_cpu_ptr(&softnet_data);
@@ -4736,11 +4743,10 @@ static int napi_schedule_rps(struct softnet_data *sd)
mysd->rps_ipi_list = sd;
__raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
- return 1;
+ return;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_RPS */
__napi_schedule_irqoff(&mysd->backlog);
- return 0;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_FLOW_LIMIT
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-13 17:58 [PATCH v6.1-rt 00/15] net: Backport backlog-NAPI threads to resolve PREEMPT_RT softirq warning in SMP flush wen.yang
2026-10-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 01/15] Revert "net: Avoid the IPI to free the" wen.yang
2026-10-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 02/15] net: avoid irqsave in skb_defer_free_flush wen.yang
2026-10-13 17:58 ` wen.yang [this message]
2026-10-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 04/15] net: add softnet_data.in_net_rx_action wen.yang
2026-10-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 05/15] net: optimize napi_schedule_rps() wen.yang
2026-10-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 06/15] net: optimize ____napi_schedule() to avoid extra NET_RX_SOFTIRQ wen.yang
2026-10-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 07/15] net: add debugging checks in skb_attempt_defer_free() wen.yang
2026-10-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 08/15] net: do not provide hard irq safety for sd->defer_lock wen.yang
2026-10-13 17:58 ` [PATCH 09/15] net: move skb_defer_free_flush() up wen.yang
2026-10-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 10/15] net: make napi_threaded_poll() aware of sd->defer_list wen.yang
2026-10-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 11/15] net: optimize napi_threaded_poll() vs RPS/RFS wen.yang
2026-10-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 12/15] net: Remove conditional threaded-NAPI wakeup based on task state wen.yang
2026-10-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 13/15] net: Use backlog-NAPI to clean up the defer_list wen.yang
2026-10-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 14/15] net: Allow to use SMP threads for backlog NAPI wen.yang
2026-10-13 18:02 ` [PATCH 15/15] net: Rename rps_lock to backlog_lock wen.yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9703e2ac1d47f48775c312a6fc54cb3f874142f6.1791912669.git.wen.yang@linux.dev \
--to=wen.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@list.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®